Literature DB >> 22538450

Randomized trial comparing late concentration-controlled calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal.

Jacqueline S Mourer1, Jan den Hartigh, Erik W van Zwet, Marko J K Mallat, Jeroen Dubbeld, Johan W de Fijter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has not become routine practice, due to concerns about excess acute rejection. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be advantageous when the CNI or MMF is withdrawn.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized, concentration-controlled withdrawal study enrolled 177 stable renal transplant recipients on maintenance CNI-based immunosuppression, combined with steroids and MMF. After the feasibility phase of the study, patients were randomized to MMF-withdrawal (target area under the time-concentration curve-cyclosporine: 3250 ng·hr/mL or tacrolimus: 120 ng·hr/mL) or CNI-withdrawal (target area under the time-concentration curve-mycophenolic acid: 75 μg·hr/mL).
RESULTS: The estimated glomerular filtration rate (modification of diet in renal disease) remained significantly better after CNI elimination (59.5±2.1 mL/min vs. 51.1±2.1 mL/min, P = 0.006) up to 3 years and resulted in less functional decline, including the subgroup with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 50 mL/min at baseline (P = 0.03). At 6 months, one patient in the MMF-withdrawal group (1.3%) and three in the CNI-withdrawal group (3.8%) experienced acute rejection (P = 0.62). The defined higher mycophenolic acid exposure was well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: These data indicate that with time the large majority of stable renal transplant recipients can be safely reduced to dual therapy with MMF or CNIs, applying concentration-controlled dosing. CNI-free patients, including those with moderate renal allograft dysfunction, have the benefit of improved renal function, whereas the risk of acute rejection after late withdrawal is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538450     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31824ad60a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal or tapering for kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Krishna M Karpe; Girish S Talaulikar; Giles D Walters
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-21

Review 2.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

3.  Managing transplant rejection in the elderly: the benefits of less aggressive immunosuppressive regimens.

Authors:  Kristian Heldal; Karsten Midtvedt
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Late kidney dysfunction in a kidney transplant recipient.

Authors:  Michelle A Josephson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors:  Jin Deng; Yi Lu; Lihong He; Jihong Ou; Hongping Xie
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

Review 6.  A Systematic Literature Review Approach to Estimate the Therapeutic Index of Selected Immunosuppressant Drugs After Renal Transplantation.

Authors:  Jessica E Ericson; Kanecia O Zimmerman; Daniel Gonzalez; Chiara Melloni; Jeffrey T Guptill; Kevin D Hill; Huali Wu; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 7.  Long-term outcomes of children after solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Jon Jin Kim; Stephen D Marks
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Occurrence of De novo Donor-Specific Antibodies After COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients Is Low Despite Immunosuppression Modulation.

Authors:  Christophe Masset; Gabriela Gautier-Vargas; Diego Cantarovich; Simon Ville; Jacques Dantal; Florent Delbos; Alexandre Walencik; Clarisse Kerleau; Maryvonne Hourmant; Claire Garandeau; Aurélie Meurette; Magali Giral; Ilies Benotmane; Sophie Caillard; Gilles Blancho
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-02-07

9.  Temporary antimetabolite treatment hold boosts SARS-CoV-2 vaccination-specific humoral and cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Eva Schrezenmeier; Hector Rincon-Arevalo; Annika Jens; Ana-Luisa Stefanski; Charlotte Hammett; Bilgin Osmanodja; Nadine Koch; Bianca Zukunft; Julia Beck; Michael Oellerich; Vanessa Proß; Carolin Stahl; Mira Choi; Friederike Bachmann; Lutz Liefeldt; Petra Glander; Ekkehard Schütz; Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki; Covadonga López Del Moral; Hubert Schrezenmeier; Carolin Ludwig; Bernd Jahrsdörfer; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Nils Lachmann; Katja Kotsch; Thomas Dörner; Fabian Halleck; Arne Sattler; Klemens Budde
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-05-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.