Literature DB >> 22538345

[Distal femoral fractures].

T Neubauer1.   

Abstract

Fractures of the distal femur still represent injuries that are difficult to treat as they either affect younger patients after a high-energy trauma with soft tissue damage and osseous comminution or elderly people with impaired local vascularity and a poor bone stock. However, exactly these fractures profit from new, biological principles of treatment, which help to diminish additional surgical trauma by indirect fracture reduction and insertion of stabilizing implants via mini-incisions. Basically, these techniques are represented by retrograde intramedullary nails and submuscularilly inserted plates/internal fixateurs. While intramedullary nails are well suited to fix extramedullary and simple articular fractures (C1), plates can also be used to treat complex articular fractures. Nevertheless, any displaced articular fracture component must still be anatomically reduced by an open approach and fixed with absolute stability. Technical advances as well as demographic changes will continue to represent challenges in the treatment of these fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538345     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-012-2218-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  39 in total

1.  [Distal fractures of the femur].

Authors:  P Schandelmaier; C Stephan; C Krettek; H Tscherne
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [LISS versus condylar plate].

Authors:  U Hahn; A Prokop; A Jubel; J Isenberg; K E Rehm
Journal:  Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr       Date:  2002

Review 3.  Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology.

Authors:  Stephan M Perren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

4.  Supracondylar femoral fractures in elderly patients treated with the dynamic condylar screw and the retrograde intramedullary nail: a comparative study of the two methods.

Authors:  A Christodoulou; I Terzidis; A Ploumis; S Metsovitis; A Koukoulidis; C Toptsis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Compartment syndrome of the thigh: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nwakile I Ojike; Craig S Roberts; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  The role and efficacy of retrograding nailing for the treatment of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  G Papadokostakis; C Papakostidis; R Dimitriou; P V Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures--results in a series of 46 consecutive operations.

Authors:  Lauri Handolin; Jarkko Pajarinen; Jan Lindahl; Eero Hirvensalo
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications?

Authors:  Max Markmiller; Gerhard Konrad; Norbert Südkamp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Minimal-invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures with the LISS (Less Invasive Stabilization System): a prospective study of 30 fractures with a follow up of 20 months.

Authors:  Florian Fankhauser; Gerald Gruber; Gert Schippinger; Christian Boldin; Herwig P Hofer; Wolfgang Grechenig; Rudolf Szyszkowitz
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02

10.  [Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: LISS or retrograde intramedullary nailing? Problems with the use of minimally invasive technique].

Authors:  M Wick; E J Müller; F Kutscha-Lissberg; F Hopf; G Muhr
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.