BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: GM volume, WMH volume, and FA are each associated with cognition; however, few studies have detected whether these 3 different types of MR imaging measurements exert independent or additive effects on cognitive performance. To detect their extent of contribution to cognitive performance, we explored the independent and additive contributions of GM atrophy, white matter injury, and white matter integrity to cognition in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and 9 elderly patients participated in the study: 97 were CN adults, 65 had MCI, and 47 had dementia. We measured GM on T1-weighted MR imaging, WMH on FLAIR, and FA on DTI, along with psychometrically matched measures of 4 domains of cognitive performance, including semantic memory, episodic memory, executive function, and spatial abilities. RESULTS: As expected, patients with dementia performed significantly more poorly in all 4 cognitive domains, whereas patients with MCI performed generally less poorly than dementia patients, though considerable overlap in performance was present across groups. GM, FA, and WMH each differed significantly between diagnostic groups and were associated with cognitive measures. In multivariate models that included all 3 MR imaging measures (GM, WMH, and FA), GM volume was the strongest determinant of cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly suggest that MR imaging measures of GM are more closely associated with cognitive function than WM measures across a broad range of cognitive and functional impairment.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:GM volume, WMH volume, and FA are each associated with cognition; however, few studies have detected whether these 3 different types of MR imaging measurements exert independent or additive effects on cognitive performance. To detect their extent of contribution to cognitive performance, we explored the independent and additive contributions of GM atrophy, white matter injury, and white matter integrity to cognition in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and 9 elderly patients participated in the study: 97 were CN adults, 65 had MCI, and 47 had dementia. We measured GM on T1-weighted MR imaging, WMH on FLAIR, and FA on DTI, along with psychometrically matched measures of 4 domains of cognitive performance, including semantic memory, episodic memory, executive function, and spatial abilities. RESULTS: As expected, patients with dementia performed significantly more poorly in all 4 cognitive domains, whereas patients with MCI performed generally less poorly than dementiapatients, though considerable overlap in performance was present across groups. GM, FA, and WMH each differed significantly between diagnostic groups and were associated with cognitive measures. In multivariate models that included all 3 MR imaging measures (GM, WMH, and FA), GM volume was the strongest determinant of cognitive performance. CONCLUSIONS: These results strongly suggest that MR imaging measures of GM are more closely associated with cognitive function than WM measures across a broad range of cognitive and functional impairment.
Authors: M D Kopelman; D Lasserson; D Kingsley; F Bello; C Rush; N Stanhope; T Stevens; G Goodman; G Heilpern; B Kendall; A Colchester Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: J C Rajapakse; C DeCarli; A McLaughlin; J N Giedd; A L Krain; S D Hamburger; J L Rapoport Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1996 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Christopher I Petkov; Christine C Wu; Jamie L Eberling; Dan Mungas; Patricia A Zrelak; Andrew P Yonelinas; Mary N Haan; William J Jagust Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Costantino Iadecola; Kristine Yaffe; José Biller; Lisa C Bratzke; Frank M Faraci; Philip B Gorelick; Martha Gulati; Hooman Kamel; David S Knopman; Lenore J Launer; Jane S Saczynski; Sudha Seshadri; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Trey Hedden; Elizabeth C Mormino; Rebecca E Amariglio; Alayna P Younger; Aaron P Schultz; J Alex Becker; Randy L Buckner; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Dorene M Rentz Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Zoe Arvanitakis; Debra A Fleischman; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Sue E Leurgans; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 3.270
Authors: Julia A Scott; Duygu Tosun; Meredith N Braskie; Pauline Maillard; Paul M Thompson; Michael Weiner; Charles DeCarli; Owen T Carmichael Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Sarah Hirsiger; Vincent Koppelmans; Susan Mérillat; Cornelia Erdin; Atul Narkhede; Adam M Brickman; Lutz Jäncke Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Raul Vintimilla; James Hall; Kevin King; Meredith N Braskie; Leigh Johnson; Kristine Yaffe; Arthur W Toga; Sid O'Bryant Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2021-10-14