OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess retrospectively the imaging features of diaphyseal osteosarcoma and compare its characteristics with that of metaphyseal osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen pathologically confirmed diaphyseal osteosarcomas were reviewed. Images of X-ray (n=18), CT (n=12) and MRI (n=15) were evaluated by two radiologists. Differences among common radiologic findings of X-ray, CT and MRI, and between diaphyseal osteosarcomas and metaphyseal osteosarcomas in terms of tumor characteristics were compared. RESULTS: The common imaging features of diaphyseal osteosarcoma were bone destruction, lamellar periosteal reaction with/without Codman triangle, massive soft tissue mass/swelling, neoplastic bone and/or calcification. CT and MRI had a higher detection rate in detecting bone destruction (P=0.001) as compared with that of X-ray. X-ray and CT resulted in a higher percentage in detecting periosteal reaction (P=0.018) and neoplastic bone and/or calcification (P=0.043) as compared with that of MRI. There was no difference (P=0.179) in detecting soft tissue mass among three imaging modalities. When comparing metaphyseal osteosarcoma to diaphyseal osteosarcoma, the latter had the following characteristics: a higher age of onset (P=0.022), a larger extent of tumor (P=0.018), a more osteolytic radiographic pattern (P=0.043). CONCLUSION: As compared with metaphyseal osteosarcoma, diaphysial osteosarcoma is a special location of osteosarcoma with a lower incidence, a higher age of onset, a larger extent of tumor, a more osteolytic radiographic pattern. The osteoblastic and mixed types are diagnosed easily, but the osteolytic lesion should be differentiated from Ewing sarcoma. X-ray, CT and MRI can show imaging features from different aspects with different detection rates.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess retrospectively the imaging features of diaphyseal osteosarcoma and compare its characteristics with that of metaphyseal osteosarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen pathologically confirmed diaphyseal osteosarcomas were reviewed. Images of X-ray (n=18), CT (n=12) and MRI (n=15) were evaluated by two radiologists. Differences among common radiologic findings of X-ray, CT and MRI, and between diaphyseal osteosarcomas and metaphyseal osteosarcomas in terms of tumor characteristics were compared. RESULTS: The common imaging features of diaphyseal osteosarcoma were bone destruction, lamellar periosteal reaction with/without Codman triangle, massive soft tissue mass/swelling, neoplastic bone and/or calcification. CT and MRI had a higher detection rate in detecting bone destruction (P=0.001) as compared with that of X-ray. X-ray and CT resulted in a higher percentage in detecting periosteal reaction (P=0.018) and neoplastic bone and/or calcification (P=0.043) as compared with that of MRI. There was no difference (P=0.179) in detecting soft tissue mass among three imaging modalities. When comparing metaphyseal osteosarcoma to diaphyseal osteosarcoma, the latter had the following characteristics: a higher age of onset (P=0.022), a larger extent of tumor (P=0.018), a more osteolytic radiographic pattern (P=0.043). CONCLUSION: As compared with metaphyseal osteosarcoma, diaphysial osteosarcoma is a special location of osteosarcoma with a lower incidence, a higher age of onset, a larger extent of tumor, a more osteolytic radiographic pattern. The osteoblastic and mixed types are diagnosed easily, but the osteolytic lesion should be differentiated from Ewing sarcoma. X-ray, CT and MRI can show imaging features from different aspects with different detection rates.
Authors: José Luiz de Sá Neto; Marcelo Novelino Simão; Michel Daoud Crema; Edgard Eduard Engel; Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa Journal: Radiol Bras Date: 2017 May-Jun