Literature DB >> 22537747

Diagnostic accuracy of solid phase HLA antibody assays for prediction of crossmatch strength.

Thomas M Ellis1, Jennifer J Schiller, Allan M Roza, David C Cronin, Brian D Shames, Christopher P Johnson.   

Abstract

Solid phase antibody assays are increasingly used to provide quantitative measures of donor-specific HLA antibodies for assessment of pretransplant risk, although cell-based crossmatches continue to serve as gold standards for determination of donor HLA antibody strength. This study determined the ability of HLA antibody solid phase assays to predict the strength of cell-based flow cytometric (FC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatches. Eighty-two recipient/donors pairs were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to determine the accuracy of donor-specific median fluorescence intensity values (Σ MFI) from single antigen bead assays for predicting strong FC and CDC crossmatches. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of optimal Σ MFI values were highest for predicting strong T cell FCs. Σ MFI values showed good sensitivity for predicting positive direct and AHG-augmented CDC crossmatches (91% and 94%, respectively), but with lower specificity (67% each). Specificity and sensitivity for predicting positive B cell CDC crossmatches were 73% and 84%. Σ MFI values derived from single antigen bead assays can predict strong flow and positive CDC crossmatches, but with tradeoffs between sensitivity and specificity. The results support the use of solid phase assays for quantitative virtual crossmatching and as a replacement for cell-based crossmatching.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22537747     DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2012.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Immunol        ISSN: 0198-8859            Impact factor:   2.850


  9 in total

1.  Salvage haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation for graft rejection following a prior haploidentical allograft.

Authors:  N Epperla; M Pasquini; K Pierce; W R Drobyski; J D Rizzo; M M Horowitz; W Saber; K Zellner; S Ramirez; K Bartz; R V Raj; P N Hari; M Hamadani
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Clinical Outcomes of Lung Transplantation in the Presence of Donor-Specific Antibodies.

Authors:  Andrew M Courtwright; Severine Cao; Isabelle Wood; Hari R Mallidi; Jared Kawasawa; Anna Moniodis; Julie Ng; Souheil El-Chemaly; Hilary J Goldberg
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-09

3.  Virtual HLA Crossmatching as a Means to Safely Expedite Transplantation of Imported Pancreata.

Authors:  Brian C Eby; Robert R Redfield; Thomas M Ellis; Glen E Leverson; Abby R Schenian; Jon S Odorico
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Unilateral humoral rejection after reoperative single-lung transplant.

Authors:  Claude A Beaty; Alexander Yang; Timothy J George; Peter B Illei; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Clinical outcomes among renal transplant recipients with pre-transplant weakly reactive donor-specific antibodies.

Authors:  Peter S Yoo; Alexander Bonnel; Malek Kamoun; Matthew H Levine
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 6.  Human leukocyte antigens and alloimmunization in heart transplantation: an open debate.

Authors:  Antonietta Picascia; Vincenzo Grimaldi; Amelia Casamassimi; Maria Rosaria De Pascale; Concetta Schiano; Claudio Napoli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Historical Matching Strategies in Kidney Paired Donation: The 7-Year Evolution of a Web-Based Virtual Matching System.

Authors:  D E Fumo; V Kapoor; L J Reece; S M Stepkowski; J E Kopke; S E Rees; C Smith; A E Roth; A B Leichtman; M A Rees
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 9.369

8.  Comparative analysis of Luminex-based donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity values with complement-dependent cytotoxicity & flow crossmatch results in live donor renal transplantation.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar Baranwal; Deepali Krishan Bhat; Sanjeev Goswami; Sanjay Kumar Agarwal; Gurvinder Kaur; Jasmeet Kaur; Narinder Mehra
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Assessment of Spanish Panel Reactive Antibody Calculator and Potential Usefulness.

Authors:  Esther Asensio; Marcos López-Hoyos; Íñigo Romón; Jesús Ontañón; David San Segundo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 7.561

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.