INTRODUCTION: The perpetuating mechanisms for human atrial fibrillation (AF) remain undefined. Localized rotors and focal beat sources may sustain AF in elegant animal models, but there has been no direct evidence for localized sources in human AF using traditional methods. We developed a clinical computational mapping approach, guided by human atrial tissue physiology, to reveal sources of human AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 49 AF patients referred for ablation (62 ± 9 years; 30 persistent), we defined repolarization dynamics using monophasic action potentials (MAPs) and recorded AF activation from 64-pole basket catheters in left atrium and, in n = 20 patients, in both atria. Careful positioning of basket catheters was required for optimal mapping. AF electrograms at 64-128 electrodes were combined with repolarization and conduction dynamics to construct spatiotemporal AF maps. We observed sustained sources in 47/49 patients, in the form of electrical rotors (n = 57) and focal beats (n = 11) that controlled local atrial activation with peripheral wavebreak (fibrillatory conduction). Patients with persistent AF had more sources than those with paroxysmal AF (2.1 ± 1.0 vs 1.5 ± 0.8, P = 0.02), related to shorter cycle length (163 ± 19 milliseconds vs 187 ± 25 milliseconds, P < 0.001). Approximately one-quarter of sources lay in the right atrium. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologically guided computational mapping revealed sustained electrical rotors and repetitive focal beats during human AF for the first time. These localized sources were present in 96% of AF patients, and controlled AF activity. These results provide novel mechanistic insights into human AF and lay the foundation for mechanistically tailored approaches to AF ablation.
INTRODUCTION: The perpetuating mechanisms for humanatrial fibrillation (AF) remain undefined. Localized rotors and focal beat sources may sustain AF in elegant animal models, but there has been no direct evidence for localized sources in humanAF using traditional methods. We developed a clinical computational mapping approach, guided by human atrial tissue physiology, to reveal sources of humanAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 49 AFpatients referred for ablation (62 ± 9 years; 30 persistent), we defined repolarization dynamics using monophasic action potentials (MAPs) and recorded AF activation from 64-pole basket catheters in left atrium and, in n = 20 patients, in both atria. Careful positioning of basket catheters was required for optimal mapping. AF electrograms at 64-128 electrodes were combined with repolarization and conduction dynamics to construct spatiotemporal AF maps. We observed sustained sources in 47/49 patients, in the form of electrical rotors (n = 57) and focal beats (n = 11) that controlled local atrial activation with peripheral wavebreak (fibrillatory conduction). Patients with persistent AF had more sources than those with paroxysmal AF (2.1 ± 1.0 vs 1.5 ± 0.8, P = 0.02), related to shorter cycle length (163 ± 19 milliseconds vs 187 ± 25 milliseconds, P < 0.001). Approximately one-quarter of sources lay in the right atrium. CONCLUSIONS: Physiologically guided computational mapping revealed sustained electrical rotors and repetitive focal beats during humanAF for the first time. These localized sources were present in 96% of AFpatients, and controlled AF activity. These results provide novel mechanistic insights into humanAF and lay the foundation for mechanistically tailored approaches to AF ablation.
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Timo Weimar; Marci S Bailey; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Donna Marin; Hersh S Maniar; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; Michael R Franz; Paul Clopton; Etienne J Pruvot; David E Krummen Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-06-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew J Gonzales; Kevin P Vincent; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Andrew D McCulloch Journal: Europace Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Tina Baykaner; Paul Clopton; Gautam G Lalani; Amir A Schricker; David E Krummen; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Anthony J Salmin; Prasanth Ganesan; Kristina E Shillieto; Elizabeth M Cherry; David T Huang; Arkady M Pertsov; Behnaz Ghoraani Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2016-08
Authors: Sohail Zahid; Hubert Cochet; Patrick M Boyle; Erica L Schwarz; Kaitlyn N Whyte; Edward J Vigmond; Rémi Dubois; Mélèze Hocini; Michel Haïssaguerre; Pierre Jaïs; Natalia A Trayanova Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 10.787