| Literature DB >> 22537052 |
J Limpens1, G Granath2, R Aerts3, M M P D Heijmans1, L J Sheppard4, L Bragazza5,6,7, B L Williams8, H Rydin2, J Bubier9, T Moore10, L Rochefort11, E A D Mitchell12, A Buttler6,7,13, L J L van den Berg14, U Gunnarsson2, A-J Francez15, R Gerdol5, M Thormann16, P Grosvernier17, M M Wiedermann18, M B Nilsson18, M R Hoosbeek19, S Bayley20, J-F Nordbakken21, M P C P Paulissen22, S Hotes23, A Breeuwer1, M Ilomets24, H B M Tomassen25, I Leith4, B Xu26.
Abstract
• Peat bogs have accumulated more atmospheric carbon (C) than any other terrestrial ecosystem today. Most of this C is associated with peat moss (Sphagnum) litter. Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition can decrease Sphagnum production, compromising the C sequestration capacity of peat bogs. The mechanisms underlying the reduced production are uncertain, necessitating multifactorial experiments. • We investigated whether glasshouse experiments are reliable proxies for field experiments for assessing interactions between N deposition and environment as controls on Sphagnum N concentration and production. We performed a meta-analysis over 115 glasshouse experiments and 107 field experiments. • We found that glasshouse and field experiments gave similar qualitative and quantitative estimates of changes in Sphagnum N concentration in response to N application. However, glasshouse-based estimates of changes in production--even qualitative assessments-- diverged from field experiments owing to a stronger N effect on production response in absence of vascular plants in the glasshouse, and a weaker N effect on production response in presence of vascular plants compared to field experiments. • Thus, although we need glasshouse experiments to study how interacting environmental factors affect the response of Sphagnum to increased N deposition, we need field experiments to properly quantify these effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22537052 DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04157.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Phytol ISSN: 0028-646X Impact factor: 10.151