| Literature DB >> 22536490 |
Kevin J P Ryan1, Matthew J Elmes, Simon C Langley-Evans.
Abstract
A maternal low-protein diet (MLP) fed during pregnancy leads to hypertension in adult rat offspring. Hypertension is a major risk factor for ischaemic heart disease. This study examined the capacity of hearts from MLP-exposed offspring to recover from myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) and related this to cardiac expression of β-adrenergic receptors (β-AR) and their associated G proteins. Pregnant rats were fed control (CON) or MLP diets (n = 12 each group) throughout pregnancy. When aged 6 months, hearts from offspring underwent Langendorff cannulation to assess contractile function during baseline perfusion, 30 min ischemia and 60 min reperfusion. CON male hearts demonstrated impaired recovery in left ventricular pressure (LVP) and dP/dt(max) (P < 0.01) during reperfusion when compared to MLP male hearts. Maternal diet had no effect on female hearts to recover from IR. MLP males exhibited greater membrane expression of β(2)-AR following reperfusion and urinary excretion of noradrenaline and dopamine was lower in MLP and CON female rats versus CON males. In conclusion, the improved cardiac recovery in MLP male offspring following IR was attributed to greater membrane expression of β(2)-AR and reduced noradrenaline and dopamine levels. In contrast, females exhibiting both decreased membrane expression of β(2)-AR and catecholamine levels were protected from IR injury.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22536490 PMCID: PMC3321448 DOI: 10.1155/2012/397389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Metab ISSN: 2090-0724
Effect of maternal protein restriction on the cardiac recovery of male and female rat hearts during ischemia reperfusion. Measures of cardiac function include left ventricular pressure (LVP), the left ventricular first derivative (dP/dt max), and heart rate (HR). These parameters were determined at baseline and during 60 min reperfusion following 30 min ischemia. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM values. Recovery 1 and 2 denote 0–30 and 31–60 min reperfusion periods, respectively.
| Males | Females | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | MLP |
| CON | MLP |
| |||||
| Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |||
| LVP (mmHg) | ||||||||||
| Baseline | 44.67 | 3.0 | 50.18 | 5.3 | 0.38 | 43.74 | 4.1 | 50.57 | 5.1 | 0.31 |
| Recovery 1 | 5.81 | 1.0 | 11.71 | 1.6 |
| 10.83 | 2.0 | 10.83 | 2.3 | 1.00 |
| Recovery 2 | 7.25 | 1.7 | 15.33 | 3.3 |
| 11.31 | 2.3 | 13.24 | 2.6 | 0.58 |
| Recovery 1 (% baseline) | 13.8 | 3.3 | 23.31 | 4.0 | 0.09 | 28.41 | 6.3 | 25.16 | 6.6 | 0.88 |
| Recovery 2 (% baseline) | 18.3 | 5.3 | 33.24 | 8.0 | 0.16 | 29.33 | 6.6 | 31.11 | 7.2 | 0.87 |
| HR (beats per min) | ||||||||||
| Baseline | 302.42 | 21.3 | 290.9 | 7.0 | 0.61 | 331.76 | 18.8 | 298.23 | 19.7 | 0.23 |
| Recovery 1 | 112.16 | 26.5 | 105 | 24.4 | 0.85 | 129.53 | 25.1 | 183.46 | 26.9 | 0.16 |
| Recovery 2 | 195.42 | 19.3 | 169.54 | 28.2 | 0.47 | 179.41 | 31.5 | 255.36 | 38.0 | 0.14 |
| Recovery 1 (% baseline) | 30.6 | 7.1 | 43.26 | 6.9 | 0.50 | 37.89 | 7.9 | 60.22 | 8.8 | 0.08 |
| Recovery 2 (% baseline) | 65.1 | 7.1 | 59.45 | 9.8 | 0.66 | 53.65 | 10.9 | 85.03 | 12.2 | 0.07 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Baseline | 1186.01 | 101.9 | 1398.09 | 135.5 | 0.23 | 1252.42 | 106.5 | 1402.94 | 133.8 | 0.39 |
| Recovery 1 | 381.59 | 32.9 | 625.55 | 78.1 |
| 515.82 | 66.5 | 530.37 | 53.4 | 0.87 |
| Recovery 2 | 409.39 | 52.1 | 599.45 | 79.1 | 0.06 | 570.02 | 84.2 | 544.59 | 51.1 | 0.81 |
| Recovery 1 (% baseline) | 31.52 | 4.1 | 47.34 | 7.2 | 0.08 | 42.29 | 5.4 | 40.35 | 5.2 | 0.54 |
| Recovery 2 (% baseline) | 35.43 | 4.7 | 43.76 | 6.8 | 0.33 | 45.51 | 5.4 | 42.78 | 5.0 | 0.33 |
Figure 1β-adrenergic receptor (AR) isoforms, Gs, and Gi protein expression in cardiac membranes from CON and MLP Langendorff perfused rat hearts at baseline and following ischemia and ischemia reperfusion. Cardiac membrane expression of β 1-AR (a), β 2-AR, (b) Gs (c), and Gi (d) was determined by western blot analysis. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM values for isolated hearts exposed to either baseline (B) perfusion, 30 min ischemia (I), or 30 min ischemia followed by 60 min reperfusion (IR) from Con Female, Con Male, or protein-restricted (MLP) MLP Female or MLP Male rats. Data were analysed by three-way ANOVA. β 1-AR showed an interaction effect between maternal diet and sex (P < 0.05) and an effect of ischemia reperfusion treatment (P < 0.01). β 2-AR expression showed an interaction effect of maternal diet, sex, and ischemia reperfusion treatment (P < 0.05).
Figure 2β-adrenergic receptor (AR) isoforms, Gs, and Gi protein expression in cardiac cytosolic fractions from CON and MLP Langendorff perfused rat hearts at baseline and following ischemia and ischemia reperfusion. Cardiac cytosolic expression of β 1-AR (a), β 2-AR (b), Gs (c), and Gi (d) was determined by western blot analysis. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM values for isolated hearts exposed to either baseline (B) perfusion, 30 min ischemia (I) or 30 min ischemia followed by 60 min reperfusion (IR) from Con Female, Con Male, or protein-restricted (MLP) MLP Female or MLP Male rats. Data were analysed by three-way ANOVA. β 1-AR and β 2-AR showed effects of ischemia reperfusion treatment (P < 0.001).
Catecholamine concentration levels in the urine of rats at 5 weeks, 10 weeks and 6 months of age. Urine was collected over a 24 h period and the concentration (ng/mL) of adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine were measured by ELISA. Adrenaline and dopamine were log transformed and Noradrenaline underwent square root transformation to produce homogeneous data. The transformed data was then analysed by three-way ANOVA and expressed as mean and SEM with corresponding P values for each analysis.
| Adrenaline (ng/mL) | Noradrenaline (ng/mL) | Dopamine (ng/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | Mean | SEM | ||
| CON Female | 5 weeks | 7.72 | 3.23 | 249.19 | 57.05 | 316.14 | 69.9 |
| 10 weeks | 23.01 | 4.27 | 128.28 | 75.48 | 294.8 | 83.17 | |
| 6 months | 18.96 | 4.27 | 151.38 | 61.63 | 113.37 | 43.2 | |
|
| |||||||
| MLP Female | 5 weeks | 6.88 | 3.82 | 240.61 | 53.37 | 158.64 | 55.66 |
| 10 weeks | 14.40 | 3.49 | 51.71 | 75.48 | 107.61 | 29.13 | |
| 6 months | 14.57 | 3.02 | 40.62 | 67.51 | 103.9 | 24.4 | |
|
| |||||||
| CON Male | 5 weeks | 6.94 | 3.02 | 177.08 | 57.05 | 116.99 | 14.35 |
| 10 weeks | 11.17 | 4.93 | 374.06 | 61.63 | 284.9 | 56.35 | |
| 6 months | 12.63 | 3.49 | 59.58 | 75.48 | 276.2 | 72.5 | |
|
| |||||||
| MLP Male | 5 weeks | 8.59 | 4.27 | 82.80 | 61.63 | 163.98 | 61.4 |
| 10 weeks | 8.31 | 3.49 | 147.51 | 67.51 | 133.11 | 35.5 | |
| 6 months | 8.22 | 3.23 | 98.86 | 61.63 | 148.1 | 56.5 | |
|
| |||||||
| ANOVA |
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||||
| Diet | 0.117 |
|
| ||||
| Sex | 0.115 | 0.906 | 0.559 | ||||
| Age | 0.072 |
| 0.400 | ||||
| Diet × Sex | 0.662 | 0.842 | 0.880 | ||||
| Diet × Age | 0.171 | 0.623 | 0.353 | ||||
| Sex × Age | 0.438 |
|
| ||||
| Diet × Sex × Age | 0.768 | 0.105 | 0.222 | ||||