| Literature DB >> 22536110 |
Giuseppina Messina1, Elisa Pezzino, Giuseppe Montesanto, Domenico Caruso, Bianca Maria Lombardo.
Abstract
Ecosystems comprising coastal lakes and ponds are important areas for preserving biodiversity. The natural reserve "Saline di Trapani e Paceco" is an interesting natural area in Sicily, formed by the remaining strips of land among salt pans near the coastline. From January 2008 to January 2010, pitfall trapping was conducted in five sampling sites inside the study area. The community of terrestrial isopods was assessed using the main diversity indices. Twenty-four species were collected, only one of them endemic to western Sicily: Porcellio siculoccidentalis Viglianisi, Lombardo & Caruso, 1992. Two species are new to Sicily: Armadilloniscus candidus Budde-Lund, 1885 and Armadilloniscus ellipticus (Harger, 1878). This is high species richness for a single reserve in Sicily. The extended sampling period also allowed us to study species phenology. Most of the species exhibited higher activity in spring than in autumn while some species also exhibited lower activity in the summer. The species richness revealed that the study area is in an acceptable conservation status; Shannon and Pielou indices also confirmed a more or less even distribution of individuals belonging to different species.Entities:
Keywords: Isopoda; Oniscidea; Sicily; biodiversity; frequency; phenology
Year: 2012 PMID: 22536110 PMCID: PMC3335416 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.176.2367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Figure 1.Map of the study area. Sampling sites are indicated. Salt pans are represented by polygons.
Species and number of catches for each sampling site; diversity indices values for each sampling site are also reported.
| 2 | 3 | 5 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | |||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
| 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| 330 | 1 | 520 | 2 | 853 | ||
| 20 | 1 | 21 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |||
| 218 | 368 | 1664 | 1043 | 195 | 3488 | |
| 8 | 8 | |||||
| 1 | 1 | |||||
| 28 | 6 | 16 | 12 | 62 | ||
| 11 | 13 | 21 | 18 | 10 | 73 | |
| 4 | 4 | |||||
| 85 | 727 | 357 | 4 | 267 | 1440 | |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |||
| 4 | 4 | 8 | ||||
| 4 | 6 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 33 | |
| 66 | 47 | 486 | 178 | 27 | 804 | |
| 45 | 45 | |||||
| 5 | 5 | |||||
| 887 | 23 | 174 | 510 | 2 | 1596 | |
| 1 | 424 | 1 | 426 | |||
| 14 | 540 | 1525 | 3 | 11847 | 13929 | |
| 7 | 380 | 895 | 9 | 1291 | ||
| 17 | 11 | 15 | 14 | 16 | 24 | |
| 2.1510 | 1.3400 | 1.6370 | 1.6160 | 1.5920 | 2.2790 | |
| 1.4980 | 1.3180 | 1.7500 | 1.5750 | 0.2301 | 1.4810 | |
| 0.5286 | 0.5495 | 0.6460 | 0.5969 | 0.0830 | 0.4661 | |
| 0.5215 | 0.4181 | 0.3214 | 0.3350 | 0.9571 | 0.5778 |
Figure 2.Total frequency (%) of catches for the observed families.
Similarity analysis based on the Jaccard index (below the diagonal) and Sörensen index (above the diagonal).
| 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.52 | 0.05 | ||
| 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.20 | 0.15 | ||
| 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.44 | 0.23 | ||
| 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.03 | ||
| 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.72 | 0.43 |
Temporal frequency (%) analysis for each sampling site.
| 95.65 | ||
| 86.96 | ||
| 69.57 | ||
| 65.22 | ||
| 65.22 | ||
| 52.17 | ||
| 39.13 | ||
| 26.09 | ||
| 26.09 | ||
| 17.39 | ||
| 8.70 | ||
| 8.70 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 91.67 | ||
| 79.17 | ||
| 70.83 | ||
| 54.17 | ||
| 41.67 | ||
| 37.50 | ||
| 20.83 | ||
| 20.83 | ||
| 16.67 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 95.83 | ||
| 95.83 | ||
| 95.83 | ||
| 83.33 | ||
| 70.83 | ||
| 66.67 | ||
| 58.33 | ||
| 54.17 | ||
| 45.83 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 8.33 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 95.83 | ||
| 95.83 | ||
| 87.50 | ||
| 83.33 | ||
| 83.33 | ||
| 37.50 | ||
| 20.83 | ||
| 16.67 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 100.00 | ||
| 78.26 | ||
| 56.52 | ||
| 47.83 | ||
| 34.78 | ||
| 26.09 | ||
| 17.39 | ||
| 8.70 | ||
| 8.70 | ||
| 8.70 | ||
| 8.70 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 4.35 | ||
| 100.00 | ||
| 100.00 | ||
| 100.00 | ||
| 95.83 | ||
| 95.83 | ||
| 87.50 | ||
| 87.50 | ||
| 79.17 | ||
| 75.00 | ||
| 75.00 | ||
| 62.50 | ||
| 41.67 | ||
| 16.67 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 12.50 | ||
| 8.33 | ||
| 8.33 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
| 4.17 | ||
Figure 3.Frequency of catches (%) for each sampling month. a (N= 853) b (N= 21) c (N= 3488) d (N= 62) e (N= 73) f (N= 1440) g (N= 33) h (N= 804) i (N= 45) j (N= 1596) k (N= 426) l (N= 13929) m (N= 1291).