Literature DB >> 22535855

Effect of a text messaging intervention on influenza vaccination in an urban, low-income pediatric and adolescent population: a randomized controlled trial.

Melissa S Stockwell1, Elyse Olshen Kharbanda, Raquel Andres Martinez, Celibell Y Vargas, David K Vawdrey, Stewin Camargo.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Influenza infection results in substantial costs, morbidity, and mortality. Vaccination against influenza is particularly important in children and adolescents who are a significant source of transmission to other high-risk populations, yet pediatric and adolescent vaccine coverage remains low. Traditional vaccine reminders have had a limited effect on low-income populations; however, text messaging is a novel, scalable approach to promote influenza vaccination.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate targeted text message reminders for low-income, urban parents to promote receipt of influenza vaccination among children and adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial of 9213 children and adolescents aged 6 months to 18 years receiving care at 4 community-based clinics in the United States during the 2010-2011 influenza season. Of the 9213 children and adolescents, 7574 had not received influenza vaccine prior to the intervention start date and were included in the primary analysis. INTERVENTION: Parents of children assigned to the intervention received up to 5 weekly immunization registry-linked text messages providing educational information and instructions regarding Saturday clinics. Both the intervention and usual care groups received the usual care, an automated telephone reminder, and access to informational flyers posted at the study sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Receipt of an influenza vaccine dose recorded in the immunization registry via an electronic health record by March 31, 2011. Receipt was secondarily assessed at an earlier fall review date prior to typical widespread influenza activity.
RESULTS: Study children and adolescents were primarily minority, 88% were publicly insured, and 58% were from Spanish-speaking families. As of March 31, 2011, a higher proportion of children and adolescents in the intervention group (43.6%; n = 1653) compared with the usual care group (39.9%; n = 1509) had received influenza vaccine (difference, 3.7% [95% CI, 1.5%-5.9%]; relative rate ratio [RRR], 1.09 [95% CI, 1.04-1.15]; P = .001). At the fall review date, 27.1% (n = 1026) of the intervention group compared with 22.8% (n = 864) of the usual care group had received influenza vaccine (difference, 4.3% [95% CI, 2.3%-6.3%]; RRR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.10-1.28]; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Among children and adolescents in a low-income, urban population, a text messaging intervention compared with usual care was associated with an increased rate of influenza vaccination. However, the overall influenza vaccination rate remained low. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01146912.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22535855     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  125 in total

Review 1.  Nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients: can technology help?

Authors:  Erika Nerini; Fulvio Bruno; Franco Citterio; Francesco P Schena
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Cell Phone and Computer Use Among Parents Visiting an Urban Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Wendy C Shields; Elise Omaki; Eileen M McDonald; Ruth Rosenberg; Mary Aitken; Martha Wood Stevens; Andrea C Gielen
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.454

3.  Statewide pandemic influenza vaccination reminders for children with chronic conditions.

Authors:  Kevin J Dombkowski; Anne E Cowan; Rachel C Potter; Shiming Dong; Maureen Kolasa; Sarah J Clark
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Low-Cost Intervention to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rate at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Petros D Grivas; Sumana Devata; Rami Khoriaty; Philip S Boonstra; Joshua Ruch; Kevin McDonnell; Leonel Hernandez-Aya; Joshua Wilfong; Jeffrey Smerage; Michael G Ison; Joseph N S Eisenberg; Maria Silveira; Kathleen A Cooney; Francis P Worden
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Novel immunization reminder/recall approaches: rural and urban differences in parent perceptions.

Authors:  Alison W Saville; Brenda Beaty; L Miriam Dickinson; Steven Lockhart; Allison Kempe
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.107

6.  Mobile Health Interventions for Improving Health Outcomes in Youth: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Fedele; Christopher C Cushing; Alyssa Fritz; Christina M Amaro; Adrian Ortega
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Using Digital Technology to Engage and Communicate with Patients: A Survey of Patient Attitudes.

Authors:  Brian P Jenssen; Nandita Mitra; Anand Shah; Fei Wan; David Grande
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Systematic review of the incremental costs of interventions that increase immunization coverage.

Authors:  Sachiko Ozawa; Tatenda T Yemeke; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  The feasibility of using mobile-phone based SMS reminders and conditional cash transfers to improve timely immunization in rural Kenya.

Authors:  Hotenzia Wakadha; Subhash Chandir; Elijah Victor Were; Alan Rubin; David Obor; Orin S Levine; Dustin G Gibson; Frank Odhiambo; Kayla F Laserson; Daniel R Feikin
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Cost effectiveness analysis of Year 2 of an elementary school-located influenza vaccination program-Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Byung-Kwang Yoo; Sharon G Humiston; Peter G Szilagyi; Stanley J Schaffer; Christine Long; Maureen Kolasa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.