BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Differential Normalized Fluorescence (DNF) technique has been used to distinguish high-grade dysplasia from non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. This technology may assist gastroenterologists in targeting biopsies, reducing the number of biopsies using the standard protocol. In the presence of reactive atypia/inflammation, it becomes difficult for the pathologist to differentiate non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus from Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia. Before DNF technique may be used to guide target biopsies, it is critical to know whether reactive atypia/inflammation in non-dysplastic Barrett's may result in false positives. This study was conducted to determine whether DNF technique is adversely affected by the presence of reactive atypia/inflammation in non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus resulting in false positives. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred ten-nanometer laser light was used to induce autofluorescence of Barrett's mucosa in 49 patients. The clinical study included 37 males and 12 females. This was a blinded retrospective data analysis study. A total of 303 spectra were collected and matched to non-dysplastic Barrett's biopsy results. One hundred seventy-five spectra were collected from areas with a pathology of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with reactive atypia/inflammation. One hundred twenty-eight spectra were collected from areas with non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus without reactive changes/inflammation. The spectra were analyzed using the DNF Index at 480 nm and classified as positive or negative using the threshold of -0.75 × 10(-3). RESULTS: Using DNF technique, 92.6% of non-dysplastic samples with reactive atypia/inflammation were classified correctly (162/175). 92.2% of non-dysplastic samples without reactive atypia/inflammation were classified correctly (118/128). Comparing the ratios of false positives among the two sample groups, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Using DNF technique for classification of non-dysplastic Barrett's mucosa does not result in false-positive readings due to reactive atypia/inflammation. Target biopsies guided by DNF technique may drastically reduce the number of pinch biopsies using the standard biopsy protocol.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Differential Normalized Fluorescence (DNF) technique has been used to distinguish high-grade dysplasia from non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. This technology may assist gastroenterologists in targeting biopsies, reducing the number of biopsies using the standard protocol. In the presence of reactive atypia/inflammation, it becomes difficult for the pathologist to differentiate non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus from Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia. Before DNF technique may be used to guide target biopsies, it is critical to know whether reactive atypia/inflammation in non-dysplastic Barrett's may result in false positives. This study was conducted to determine whether DNF technique is adversely affected by the presence of reactive atypia/inflammation in non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus resulting in false positives. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred ten-nanometer laser light was used to induce autofluorescence of Barrett's mucosa in 49 patients. The clinical study included 37 males and 12 females. This was a blinded retrospective data analysis study. A total of 303 spectra were collected and matched to non-dysplastic Barrett's biopsy results. One hundred seventy-five spectra were collected from areas with a pathology of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with reactive atypia/inflammation. One hundred twenty-eight spectra were collected from areas with non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus without reactive changes/inflammation. The spectra were analyzed using the DNF Index at 480 nm and classified as positive or negative using the threshold of -0.75 × 10(-3). RESULTS: Using DNF technique, 92.6% of non-dysplastic samples with reactive atypia/inflammation were classified correctly (162/175). 92.2% of non-dysplastic samples without reactive atypia/inflammation were classified correctly (118/128). Comparing the ratios of false positives among the two sample groups, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Using DNF technique for classification of non-dysplastic Barrett's mucosa does not result in false-positive readings due to reactive atypia/inflammation. Target biopsies guided by DNF technique may drastically reduce the number of pinch biopsies using the standard biopsy protocol.
Authors: I A Harle; R J Finley; M Belsheim; D C Bondy; M Booth; D Lloyd; J W McDonald; S Sullivan; L S Valberg; W C Watson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1985-10 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: B J Reid; R C Haggitt; C E Rubin; G Roth; C M Surawicz; G Van Belle; K Lewin; W M Weinstein; D A Antonioli; H Goldman Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 1988-02 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: S J Spechler; A H Robbins; H B Rubins; M E Vincent; T Heeren; W G Doos; T Colton; E M Schimmel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1984-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: C Winters; T J Spurling; S J Chobanian; D J Curtis; R L Esposito; J F Hacker; D A Johnson; D F Cruess; J D Cotelingam; M S Gurney Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1987-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: R M Cothren; R Richards-Kortum; M V Sivak; M Fitzmaurice; R P Rava; G A Boyce; M Doxtader; R Blackman; T B Ivanc; G B Hayes Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1990 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 9.427