Literature DB >> 22535562

Malignant pleural disease: diagnosis by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--initial experience.

Johan Coolen1, Frederik De Keyzer, Philippe Nafteux, Walter De Wever, Christophe Dooms, Johan Vansteenkiste, Ilse Roebben, Eric Verbeken, Paul De Leyn, Dirk Van Raemdonck, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Steven Dymarkowski, Johny Verschakelen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging for differentiating benign lesions from malignant pleural disease (MPD) and to retrospectively assess dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging acquisitions to find out whether combining these measurements with DW imaging could improve the diagnostic value of DW imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all patients provided written informed consent. Thirty-one consecutive patients with pleural abnormalities suspicious for MPD underwent whole-body positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and thorax MR examinations. Diagnostic thoracoscopy with histopathologic analysis of pleural biopsies served as the reference standard. First-line evaluation of each suspicious lesion was performed by using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated from the DW image, and the optimal cutoff value was found by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Afterward, DCE MR imaging data were used to improve the diagnosis in the range of ADCs where DW imaging results were equivocal.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT for diagnosis of MPD were 100%, 35.3%, and 64.5%. The optimal ADC threshold to differentiate benign lesions from MPD with DW MR imaging was 1.52 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 71.4%, 100%, and 87.1%, respectively. This result could be improved to 92.8%, 94.1%, and 93.5%, respectively, when DCE MR imaging data were included in those cases where ADC was between 1.52 and 2.00 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec. A total of 20 patients had disease diagnosed correctly, nine had disease diagnosed incorrectly, and two cases were undetermined with PET/CT. DW imaging helped stage disease correctly in 27 patients and incorrectly in four. The undetermined cases at PET/CT were correctly diagnosed at MR imaging.
CONCLUSION: DW imaging is a promising tool for differentiating MPD from benign lesions, with high accuracy, and supplementation with DCE MR imaging seems to further improve sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22535562     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12110872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

1.  Characterisation of solitary pulmonary lesions combining visual perfusion and quantitative diffusion MR imaging.

Authors:  Johan Coolen; Johan Vansteenkiste; Frederik De Keyzer; Herbert Decaluwé; Walter De Wever; Christophe Deroose; Christophe Dooms; Eric Verbeken; Paul De Leyn; Vincent Vandecaveye; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Steven Dymarkowski; Johny Verschakelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Volumetric assessment in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  David J Murphy; Ritu R Gill
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

3.  Clinical Implementation of a Free-Breathing, Motion-Robust Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Protocol to Evaluate Pleural Tumors.

Authors:  Thomas S C Ng; Ravi T Seethamraju; Raphael Bueno; Ritu R Gill
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Mesothelioma: Scientific clues for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  Michele Carbone; Prasad S Adusumilli; H Richard Alexander; Paul Baas; Fabrizio Bardelli; Angela Bononi; Raphael Bueno; Emanuela Felley-Bosco; Francoise Galateau-Salle; David Jablons; Aaron S Mansfield; Michael Minaai; Marc de Perrot; Patricia Pesavento; Valerie Rusch; David T Severson; Emanuela Taioli; Anne Tsao; Gavitt Woodard; Haining Yang; Marjorie G Zauderer; Harvey I Pass
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Current best practice in the evaluation and management of malignant pleural effusions.

Authors:  Steven Walker; Anna C Bibby; Nick A Maskell
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.031

Review 6.  Applications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Thorax in Pleural Diseases: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Fernanda Miraldi Clemente Pessôa; Alessandro Severo Alves de Melo; Arthur Soares Souza; Luciana Soares de Souza; Bruno Hochhegger; Gláucia Zanetti; Edson Marchiori
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.584

7.  Role of respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of pleural disease.

Authors:  Matteo Revelli; Fabio Chiesa; Alberto Del Prato; Alberto Tagliafico; Ilan Rosenberg; Pier Aldo Canessa; Valentina Pinelli; Alessandro Villa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  European Guidelines on Pericardial Diseases: a Focused Review of Novel Aspects.

Authors:  Alexander Fardman; Philippe Charron; Massimo Imazio; Yehuda Adler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Predicting pathological subtypes and stages of thymic epithelial tumors using DWI: value of combining ADC and texture parameters.

Authors:  Bo Li; Yong-Kang Xin; Gang Xiao; Gang-Feng Li; Shi-Jun Duan; Yu Han; Xiu-Long Feng; Wei-Qiang Yan; Wei-Cheng Rong; Shu-Mei Wang; Yu-Chuan Hu; Guang-Bin Cui
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in pulmonary malignant lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ning Chang; Xiao-Hui Wang; Long-Biao Cui; Hong Yin; Tao Jiang; Fu-Lin Chen; Li-Peng Liu; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.