Literature DB >> 2253528

Edrophonium provocative test in noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation of testing techniques.

C B Dalton1, E G Hewson, D O Castell, J E Richter.   

Abstract

Edrophonium chloride is used frequently as a provocative agent in the assessment of noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). However, the optimum dose and most appropriate method of interpreting test results is controversial. We studied 150 consecutive NCCP patients and 50 age-matched controls who alternately received either 80 micrograms/kg or 10 mg intravenous bolus doses of edrophonium preceded by saline placebo injections. Distal esophageal pressures were measured before and after drug injection in response to ten 5-cc wet swallows. Following 10 mg of edrophonium, 33% of patients and 4% of controls reported chest pain, while 29% of patients and no controls receiving the 80 micrograms/kg dose complained of chest pain. Amplitude changes after either dose were not significantly different for all comparisons, but the duration of response did distinguish the two doses in patients with chest pain. A significantly greater (P = 0.01) increase in distal contraction duration occurred after 10 mg (74 +/- 12%; +/- SE) compared to 80 micrograms/kg dose (43 +/- 6%). However, individual responses to the two doses overlapped considerably. If a positive test is redefined to include both chest pain and manometric changes that are significantly different from controls, the positivity rate changes drastically; 33% to 9% in the 10-mg group and 30% to 3% in the 80-micrograms/kg group. Side effects were similar between doses, but there was a significant (P = 0.02) linear relationship between intensity of side effects and the edrophonium dose per kilogram of body weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2253528     DOI: 10.1007/bf01540560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  15 in total

1.  Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  J B Hollis; D O Castell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Effects of cholinergic stimulation on human esophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  J B Hollis; D O Castell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 3.  Esophageal disease as a cause of noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Adv Intern Med       Date:  1988

4.  Edrophonium testing for esophageal pain. Concurrence and discord.

Authors:  D O Castell; J E Richter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Spontaneous noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory esophageal motility and pH monitoring.

Authors:  L Peters; L Maas; D Petty; C Dalton; D Penner; W Wu; D Castell; J Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Esophageal chest pain. Value of high-dose provocative testing with edrophonium chloride in patients with normal esophageal manometries.

Authors:  C A Lee; J C Reynolds; A Ouyang; L Baker; S Cohen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The irritable oesophagus--a frequent cause of angina-like pain.

Authors:  G Vantrappen; J Janssens; G Ghillebert
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Long-term follow-up of symptomatic status of patients with noncardiac chest pain: is diagnosis of esophageal etiology helpful?

Authors:  B W Ward; W C Wu; J E Richter; B T Hackshaw; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Prospective manometric evaluation with pharmacologic provocation of patients with suspected esophageal motility dysfunction.

Authors:  S B Benjamin; J E Richter; C M Cordova; T E Knuff; D O Castell
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Comparison of hypertonic glucose to other provocative tests in patients with noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  S M Nasrallah; E A Hendrix
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  4 in total

1.  A prospective study of oesophageal function in patients with normal coronary angiograms and controls with angina.

Authors:  R A Cooke; A Anggiansah; J B Chambers; W J Owen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Edrophonium provocative testing for the evaluation of upper gastrointestinal hypersensitivity in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia.

Authors:  Shinichi Tsutsui; Kazunori Mine; Masanori Handa; Haruo Hayashi; Masako Hosoi; Naoko Kinukawa; Chiharu Kubo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Role of upper esophageal reflex and belch reflex dysfunctions in noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  C Gignoux; R Bost; J Hostein; Y Turberg; P Denis; M Cohard; J E Wolf; J Fournet
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Edrophonium provocative testing during electrogastrography (EGG): effects on dyspeptic symptoms and the EGG.

Authors:  E S Bonapace; H P Parkman; R S Fisher
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.