Literature DB >> 22534283

Referral of elderly cancer patients to specialists: action proposals for general practitioners.

Fleur Delva1, Pierre Soubeyran, Muriel Rainfray, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies have identified advanced age as a barrier to accessing specialized oncological care.
OBJECTIVES: To identify elements from the literature influencing general practitioners (GPs) in their decisions to refer elderly patients with cancer to oncology teams, and propose focused actions to improve referral processes.
METHODS: Eligible articles published up to July 2010 identifying factors associated with referral decisions for elderly cancer patients were selected. A quality assessment of each article was performed. All factors identified were considered for possible interventions classified by the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) taxonomy and development of recommendations for referral of elderly patients.
RESULTS: Thirty eligible articles were found with only 18 articles specifically exploring factors influencing physicians in the referral of their patients with cancer. Twelve focused on delay to treatment and only two uniquely on elderly patients. Patient age was the main factor associated with referral decisions, but this factor can influence GP's differently depending on the type of cancer. The small size of these studies, heterogeneity of study populations, and diversity of outcome measures used meant that compilation of guidelines based on high-quality evidence was not possible. However, organizational factors hindering decisions to refer are identified and highlighted as crucial for inclusion in intervention programs, specifically to reach GPs in smaller locations or with less experience in collaborating with specialists. For patient-related factors, professional and organizational interventions are necessary, aimed at both GPs and patients to update knowledge of the non-linear relationship between chronological age and a patient's ability to tolerate treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: First and foremost, this article highlights the scarcity of literature specific to elderly patients with cancer. It also identifies the public health need for better knowledge of the factors for referral of elderly patients. Focussed action proposals are presented to improve knowledge and consequently, optimize the referral process.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22534283     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  6 in total

1.  Mixed method exploration of the medical, service-related, and emotional reasons for emergency room visits of older cancer patients.

Authors:  Bich-Lien Nguyen; Dominique Tremblay; Luc Mathieu; Danielle Groleau
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Disparities in ovarian cancer survival in the United States (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Authors:  Sherri L Stewart; Rhea Harewood; Melissa Matz; Sun Hee Rim; Susan A Sabatino; Kevin C Ward; Hannah K Weir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Adherence of Primary Care Physicians to Evidence-Based Recommendations to Reduce Ovarian Cancer Mortality.

Authors:  Sherri L Stewart; Julie S Townsend; Mary C Puckett; Sun Hee Rim
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Improvement of decision-making criteria for the care of elderly cancer patients by general practitioners (Lorraine, France).

Authors:  Jean-Yves Niemier; Frédérique Claudot; Phi Linh Nguyen-Thi; Jean-Marie Hubert; Hubert Rousselot; Athanase Benetos; Christine Perret-Guillaume
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Impact of Surgeon Type and Rurality on Treatment and Survival of Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Kristin S Weeks; Charles F Lynch; Michele M West; Ryan M Carnahan; Michael A O'Rorke; Jacob J Oleson; Megan E McDonald; Mary E Charlton
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.787

6.  Patient assessment and feasibility of treatment in older patients with cancer: results from the IN-GHO® Registry.

Authors:  Friedemann Honecker; Susanne Huschens; Ralf Angermund; Gerd Kallischnigg; Werner Freier; Christoph Friedrich; Gerold Hartung; Arnulf Lutz; Burkhard Otremba; Ludger Pientka; Ernst Späth-Schwalbe; Gerald Kolb; Carsten Bokemeyer; Ulrich Wedding
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.553

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.