Literature DB >> 22534140

Can dead bacterial cells be defined and are genes expressed after cell death?

J T Trevors1.   

Abstract

There is a paucity of knowledge on gene expression in dead bacterial cells. Why would this knowledge be useful? The cells are dead. However, the time duration of gene expression following cell death is often unknown, and possibly in the order of minutes. In addition, it is a challenge to determine if bacterial cells are dead, or viable but non-culturable (VBNC), and what is an agreed upon correct definition of dead bacteria. Cells in the bacterial population or community may die at different rates or times and this complicates both the viability and gene expression analysis. In this article, the definition of dead bacterial cells is discussed and its significance in continued gene expression in cells following death. The definition of living and dead has implications for possible, completely, synthetic bacterial cells that may be capable of growth and division.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22534140     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  8 in total

1.  Changes in physiological states of Salmonella Typhimurium measured by qPCR with PMA and DyeTox13 Green Azide after pasteurization and UV treatment.

Authors:  Liyan Li; Jing Fu; Sungwoo Bae
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii Inhibit Osseointegration of Orthopedic Implants.

Authors:  Hyonmin Choe; Joscelyn M Tatro; Bryan S Hausman; Kristine M Hujer; Steve H Marshall; Ozan Akkus; Phillip N Rather; Zhenghong Lee; Robert A Bonomo; Edward M Greenfield
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide.

Authors:  Philipp Stiefel; Sabrina Schmidt-Emrich; Katharina Maniura-Weber; Qun Ren
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 4.  Sublethal Injury and Viable but Non-culturable (VBNC) State in Microorganisms During Preservation of Food and Biological Materials by Non-thermal Processes.

Authors:  Felix Schottroff; Antje Fröhling; Marija Zunabovic-Pichler; Anna Krottenthaler; Oliver Schlüter; Henry Jäger
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  New insights into the kinetics of bacterial growth and decay in pig manure-wheat straw aerobic composting based on an optimized PMA-qPCR method.

Authors:  Jinyi Ge; Guangqun Huang; Xiaoxi Sun; Hongjie Yin; Lujia Han
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Spiking a Silty-Sand Reference Soil with Bacterial DNA: Limits and Pitfalls in the Discrimination of Live and Dead Cells When Applying Ethidium Monoazide (EMA) Treatment.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Nadine Praeg; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 7.  Methods for detection of viable foodborne pathogens: current state-of-art and future prospects.

Authors:  Antonio C G Foddai; Irene R Grant
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Effect of DNA extraction procedure, repeated extraction and ethidium monoazide (EMA)/propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment on overall DNA yield and impact on microbial fingerprints for bacteria, fungi and archaea in a reference soil.

Authors:  Andreas O Wagner; Nadine Praeg; Christoph Reitschuler; Paul Illmer
Journal:  Appl Soil Ecol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.046

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.