Literature DB >> 22533454

Corn ethanol production, food exports, and indirect land use change.

T J Wallington1, J E Anderson, S A Mueller, E Kolinski Morris, S L Winkler, J M Ginder, O J Nielsen.   

Abstract

The approximately 100 million tonne per year increase in the use of corn to produce ethanol in the U.S. over the past 10 years, and projections of greater future use, have raised concerns that reduced exports of corn (and other agricultural products) and higher commodity prices would lead to land-use changes and, consequently, negative environmental impacts in other countries. The concerns have been driven by agricultural and trade models, which project that large-scale corn ethanol production leads to substantial decreases in food exports, increases in food prices, and greater deforestation globally. Over the past decade, the increased use of corn for ethanol has been largely matched by the increased corn harvest attributable mainly to increased yields. U.S. exports of corn, wheat, soybeans, pork, chicken, and beef either increased or remained unchanged. Exports of distillers' dry grains (DDG, a coproduct of ethanol production and a valuable animal feed) increased by more than an order of magnitude to 9 million tonnes in 2010. Increased biofuel production may lead to intensification (higher yields) and extensification (more land) of agricultural activities. Intensification and extensification have opposite impacts on land use change. We highlight the lack of information concerning the magnitude of intensification effects and the associated large uncertainties in assessments of the indirect land use change associated with corn ethanol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22533454     DOI: 10.1021/es300233m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production.

Authors:  Esther S Parish; Keith L Kline; Virginia H Dale; Rebecca A Efroymson; Allen C McBride; Timothy L Johnson; Michael R Hilliard; Jeffrey M Bielicki
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Engineering cyanobacteria as photosynthetic feedstock factories.

Authors:  Stephanie G Hays; Daniel C Ducat
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom - A Review.

Authors:  Crystal Turnbull; Morten Lillemo; Trine A K Hvoslef-Eide
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Land usage attributed to corn ethanol production in the United States: sensitivity to technological advances in corn grain yield, ethanol conversion, and co-product utilization.

Authors:  Rita H Mumm; Peter D Goldsmith; Kent D Rausch; Hans H Stein
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 5.  Processing maize flour and corn meal food products.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Gwirtz; Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  High-yield production of extracellular type-I cellulose by the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002.

Authors:  Chi Zhao; Zhongkui Li; Tao Li; Yingjiao Zhang; Donald A Bryant; Jindong Zhao
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 10.849

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.