Literature DB >> 22532466

Efficacy of linezolid versus a pharmacodynamically optimized vancomycin therapy in an experimental pneumonia model caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Fernando Docobo-Pérez1, Rafael López-Rojas, Juan Domínguez-Herrera, Manuel E Jiménez-Mejias, Cristina Pichardo, José Ibáñez-Martínez, Jerónimo Pachón.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The British Thoracic Society, American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines recommend vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia, based on evidence suggesting that a vancomycin AUC₀₋₂₄/MIC ratio of 400 predicts clinical success against MRSA pneumonia. The aim of this study was the evaluation of an optimized dose of vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA experimental pneumonia versus linezolid.
METHODS: In vitro activities of vancomycin and linezolid were tested using time-kill curves. Experimental pneumonia in neutropenic C57BL/6 mice was achieved using two clinical MRSA strains, MR30 and MR33 (vancomycin and linezolid MICs of 1 and 4 mg/L, respectively). In vivo dosages were 30 and 110 mg/kg vancomycin (obtaining an AUC₀₋₂₄/MIC ratio lower and higher than 400, respectively), and 30 mg/kg linezolid.
RESULTS: Survival rates in controls, and in the groups treated with 120 mg/kg/day vancomycin, 440 mg/kg/day vancomycin and 120 mg/kg/day linezolid were 85.7%, 92.9%, 76.9% and 100%, and 66.7%, 100%, 75% and 100% for MR30 and MR33, respectively. Sterile blood cultures occurred at rates of 21.4%, 64.3%, 100% and 93.8%, and 40%, 66.7%, 100% and 93.3% for MR30 and MR33 strains, respectively. Finally, the respective bacterial lung concentrations (log₁₀ cfu/g) were 8.93 ± 0.78, 6.67 ± 3.01, 3.25 ± 1.59 and 2.87 ± 1.86 for MR30, and 8.62 ± 0.72, 5.76 ± 2.43, 3.97 ± 1.52 and 1.59 ± 1.40 for MR33.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support that a vancomycin AUC₀₋₂₄/MIC ratio >400 is necessary to obtain a high bacterial lung reduction in MRSA pneumonia, comparable to that achieved with linezolid and better than that with the low dose of vancomycin tested. Linezolid was more efficacious than the pharmacodynamically optimized vancomycin dose in the pneumonia caused by the most virulent strain (MR33).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22532466     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dks142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  11 in total

Review 1.  Linezolid versus vancomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  H Jiang; R-N Tang; J Wang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  In vivo efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil in a methicillin-resistant panton-valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus rabbit pneumonia model.

Authors:  Delphine Croisier-Bertin; Davy Hayez; Sonia Da Silva; Delphine Labrousse; Donald Biek; Cedric Badiou; Oana Dumitrescu; Pascal Guerard; Pierre-Emmanuel Charles; Lionel Piroth; Gerard Lina; Francois Vandenesch; Pascal Chavanet
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Optimizing the Clinical Use of Vancomycin.

Authors:  Rocío Álvarez; Luis E López Cortés; José Molina; José M Cisneros; Jerónimo Pachón
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Assessment of an anti-alpha-toxin monoclonal antibody for prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia.

Authors:  L Hua; J J Hilliard; Y Shi; C Tkaczyk; L I Cheng; X Yu; V Datta; S Ren; H Feng; R Zinsou; A Keller; T O'Day; Q Du; L Cheng; M Damschroder; G Robbie; J Suzich; C K Stover; B R Sellman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  [Multiresistant gram-negative bacteria. A bacterial challenge of the twenty-first century].

Authors:  K Schröppel; R Riessen
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  An evidence-based review of linezolid for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): place in therapy.

Authors:  Richard R Watkins; Tracy L Lemonovich; Thomas M File
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2012-12-11

Review 7.  The multifaceted resources and microevolution of the successful human and animal pathogen methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Agnes Marie Sá Figueiredo; Fabienne Antunes Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.743

8.  Clinical outcomes of linezolid and vancomycin in patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus stratified by baseline renal function: a retrospective, cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ping Liu; Blair Capitano; Amy Stein; Ali A El-Solh
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility, MRSA and Treatment Failure in Pediatric Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Ethan Canty; Benjamin Carnahan; Tara Curley; Emily Anususinha; Rana F Hamdy; Jessica E Ericson
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Assessments of Thioridazine as a Helper Compound to Dicloxacillin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: In Vivo Trials in a Mouse Peritonitis Model.

Authors:  Michael Stenger; Kristoffer Hendel; Peter Bollen; Peter B Licht; Hans Jørn Kolmos; Janne K Klitgaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.