G W Omlor1, A G Nerlich, H Lorenz, T Bruckner, W Richter, M Pfeiffer, T Gühring. 1. Division of Experimental Orthopaedics, Department of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany. Georg.Omlor@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Disc degeneration and re-herniation after nucleotomy procedures are common problems. Simultaneous application of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based matrix has been proposed to limit disc degeneration. This, however, is hampered by loss of the substituted matrix out of the disc. Hence, in situ polymerization of the injected matrix with ultraviolet light (UVL) directly used after injection may be useful. Therefore, this study evaluates a new HA/collagen hydrogel matrix with in situ polymerization after implantation in an established porcine nucleotomy model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 mature minipigs were used. A total of 60 lumbar discs were analyzed. 36 discs underwent partial nucleotomy with a 16G biopsy needle. Of those, 24 discs received matrix (porcine nucleus pulposus collagenous scaffold component and chemically modified HA) which was in situ polymerized using UVL immediately after transplantation. 12 nucleotomized discs and 24 non-nucleotomized discs served as controls. After 24 weeks, animals were killed. X-rays, MRIs, histology, and gene expression analysis were done. RESULTS: Disc height was reduced equally after sole nucleotomy and nucleotomy with HA treatment and in MRIs signal intensity decreased. For both nucleotomy groups, the nucleus histo-degeneration score showed a significant increase compared to controls. In histology, HA treatment resulted in more scarring and inflammation in the annulus. Gene expression of catabolic MMPs was up-regulated, whereas IFN-gamma, IL-6, and IL-1b were unchanged. CONCLUSION: Although nucleotomy and administration of the implant material did not cause generalized inflammation of the disc, localized annular damage with annulus inflammation and scarring resulted in detrimental degenerative disc changes. As a result, therapeutic strategies should strongly focus on the prevention of annular damage or techniques for annular repair to remain disc integrity.
INTRODUCTION:Disc degeneration and re-herniation after nucleotomy procedures are common problems. Simultaneous application of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based matrix has been proposed to limit disc degeneration. This, however, is hampered by loss of the substituted matrix out of the disc. Hence, in situ polymerization of the injected matrix with ultraviolet light (UVL) directly used after injection may be useful. Therefore, this study evaluates a new HA/collagen hydrogel matrix with in situ polymerization after implantation in an established porcine nucleotomy model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 mature minipigs were used. A total of 60 lumbar discs were analyzed. 36 discs underwent partial nucleotomy with a 16G biopsy needle. Of those, 24 discs received matrix (porcine nucleus pulposus collagenous scaffold component and chemically modified HA) which was in situ polymerized using UVL immediately after transplantation. 12 nucleotomized discs and 24 non-nucleotomized discs served as controls. After 24 weeks, animals were killed. X-rays, MRIs, histology, and gene expression analysis were done. RESULTS: Disc height was reduced equally after sole nucleotomy and nucleotomy with HA treatment and in MRIs signal intensity decreased. For both nucleotomy groups, the nucleus histo-degeneration score showed a significant increase compared to controls. In histology, HA treatment resulted in more scarring and inflammation in the annulus. Gene expression of catabolic MMPs was up-regulated, whereas IFN-gamma, IL-6, and IL-1b were unchanged. CONCLUSION: Although nucleotomy and administration of the implant material did not cause generalized inflammation of the disc, localized annular damage with annulus inflammation and scarring resulted in detrimental degenerative disc changes. As a result, therapeutic strategies should strongly focus on the prevention of annular damage or techniques for annular repair to remain disc integrity.
Authors: Norbert Boos; Sabine Weissbach; Helmut Rohrbach; Christoph Weiler; Kevin F Spratt; Andreas G Nerlich Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Steven J Atlas; Robert B Keller; Yen A Wu; Richard A Deyo; Daniel E Singer Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-04-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Leon J Nesti; Wan-Ju Li; Rabie M Shanti; Yi Jen Jiang; Wesley Jackson; Brett A Freedman; Timothy R Kuklo; Jeffrey R Giuliani; Rocky S Tuan Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Alexander Abbushi; Michaela Endres; Mario Cabraja; Stefan Nicolas Kroppenstedt; Ulrich Wilhelm Thomale; Michael Sittinger; Aldemar Andres Hegewald; Lars Morawietz; Arne-Jörn Lemke; Victor-Götz Bansemer; Christian Kaps; Christian Woiciechowsky Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Johannes Leendert Bron; Marco N Helder; Hans-Jorg Meisel; Barend J Van Royen; Theodoor H Smit Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Sarah E Gullbrand; Thomas P Schaer; Prateek Agarwal; Justin R Bendigo; George R Dodge; Weiliam Chen; Dawn M Elliott; Robert L Mauck; Neil R Malhotra; Lachlan J Smith Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: G W Omlor; J Fischer; K Kleinschmitt; K Benz; J Holschbach; K Brohm; M Anton; T Guehring; W Richter Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Amy A Claeson; Edward J Vresilovic; Brent L Showalter; Alexander C Wright; James C Gee; Neil R Malhotra; Dawn M Elliott Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Sarit Sara Sivan; Yulia Merkher; Ellen Wachtel; Jill P G Urban; Aron Lazary; Alice Maroudas Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2013-02-18 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Benjamin Gantenbein; Svenja Illien-Jünger; Samantha C W Chan; Jochen Walser; Lisbet Haglund; Stephen J Ferguson; James C Iatridis; Sibylle Grad Journal: Curr Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.828