Literature DB >> 22531878

Using mixed methods to assess how cancer patients' needs in relation to their relatives are met in the Danish health care system: a report from the population-based study "The Cancer Patient's World".

Lone Ross1, Morten Aagaard Petersen, Anna Thit Johnsen, Louise Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Line Lund, Mogens Groenvold.   

Abstract

AIM: The aims of this paper were to validate four items assessing how patients' needs regarding support to and from their relatives are met and to investigate patients' evaluation of this support.
METHOD: Items were validated by patient-observer agreement and cognitive interviews. Adequacy of support was assessed in a cross-sectional study of 1,490 Danish cancer patients; 147 of these also answered an open-ended question.
RESULTS: All items performed well in the validation. Only 4 % reported lack of support from their relatives, whereas 9 and 11 % had lacked support from the health care professionals regarding how to tell the relatives about the disease and regarding the relatives in general, respectively. Although the patients' expectations are not unequivocal, a large proportion (35 %) reported that the health care professionals had shown little interest in how the relatives were doing. This was most pronounced for female patients and patients sampled in urban areas. Compared to older patients, younger patients lacked more support with respect to the relatives in general and regarding how to tell them about the disease. Divorced patients were less satisfied than married patients on all measures.
CONCLUSION: While most patients felt well-supported by their relatives, the oldest, the divorced, and those without children may be a vulnerable group. Many patients reported that the health care staff showed insufficient interest in the well-being of the relatives. Thus, it may be beneficial for both the patient and the relatives if health care professionals acknowledge and support the relatives in fulfilling their important role as caregiver and companion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22531878     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1466-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  30 in total

1.  Which carers of family members at the end of life need more support from health services and why?

Authors:  Beverley McNamara; Lorna Rosenwax
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Using method triangulation to validate a new instrument (CPWQ-com) assessing cancer patients' satisfaction with communication.

Authors:  Lone Ross; Louise Hyldborg Lundstrøm; Morten Aagaard Petersen; Anna Thit Johnsen; Torquil Watt; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Increased risk of severe depression in male partners of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Nakaya; Kumi Saito-Nakaya; Pernille Envold Bidstrup; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Kirsten Frederiksen; Marianne Steding-Jessen; Yosuke Uchitomi; Christoffer Johansen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  A narrative review of interventions to support family carers who provide physical care to family members with cancer.

Authors:  Ann-Louise Caress; Karen Chalmers; Karen Luker
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.837

5.  Spouse adjustment to cancer surgery: distress and coping responses.

Authors:  M A Keitel; M A Zevon; J B Rounds; N J Petrelli; C Karakousis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Couples' patterns of adjustment to colon cancer.

Authors:  L L Northouse; D Mood; T Templin; S Mellon; T George
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group.

Authors:  R Sanson-Fisher; A Girgis; A Boyes; B Bonevski; L Burton; P Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement.

Authors:  M Groenvold; M C Klee; M A Sprangers; N K Aaronson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Palliative care: views of patients and their families.

Authors:  I Higginson; A Wade; M McCarthy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-08-04

10.  Psychological distress in spouses of men treated for early-stage prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  David T Eton; Stephen J Lepore; Vicki S Helgeson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcome of supportive talks in a hospital setting: insights from cancer patients and their relatives.

Authors:  Loni Ledderer; Karen la Cour; Helle Ploug Hansen
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.