Literature DB >> 22530580

Guide for calculating and interpreting effect sizes and confidence intervals in intellectual and developmental disability research studies.

Carl J Dunst1, Deborah W Hamby.   

Abstract

This paper includes a nontechnical description of methods for calculating effect sizes in intellectual and developmental disability studies. Different hypothetical studies are used to illustrate how null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) and effect size findings can result in quite different outcomes and therefore conflicting results. Whereas NHST uses probability levels (e.g., p < .05) to evaluate the results of studies, effect size analyses focus on the magnitude of differences between groups or contrasting conditions and the strength of the relationship among variables of interest to report and interpret study results. Two families of effect sizes are described (mean difference, correlation coefficients) that are likely to be applicable to most intellectual and developmental disability studies. Sources of information on effect size calculators are included to provide researchers ready-available data analysis procedures for computing effect sizes and confidence intervals for different types of research designs and studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22530580     DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2012.673575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intellect Dev Disabil        ISSN: 1366-8250


  13 in total

1.  Benchmarks for Expected Annual Academic Growth for Students in the Bottom Quartile of the Normative Distribution.

Authors:  Nancy K Scammacca; Anna-Mária Fall; Greg Roberts
Journal:  J Res Educ Eff       Date:  2014-10-09

2.  Reading and Listening Comprehension in Individuals With Down Syndrome and Word Reading-Matched Typically Developing Children.

Authors:  Alison Prahl; C Melanie Schuele
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Influences of hand dominance on the maintenance of benefits after home-based modified constraint-induced movement therapy in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Renata C M Lima; Lucas R Nascimento; Stella M Michaelsen; Janaine C Polese; Natália D Pereira; Luci F Teixeira-Salmela
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Diet and ADHD, Reviewing the Evidence: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses of Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trials Evaluating the Efficacy of Diet Interventions on the Behavior of Children with ADHD.

Authors:  Lidy M Pelsser; Klaas Frankena; Jan Toorman; Rob Rodrigues Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Audio-Visual Perception of Gender by Infants Emerges Earlier for Adult-Directed Speech.

Authors:  Anne-Raphaëlle Richoz; Paul C Quinn; Anne Hillairet de Boisferon; Carole Berger; Hélène Loevenbruck; David J Lewkowicz; Kang Lee; Marjorie Dole; Roberto Caldara; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Specificity: A Phenotypic Comparison of Communication-Relevant Domains Between Youth With Down Syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Laura Del Hoyo Soriano; Angela John Thurman; Leonard Abbeduto
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Development and validation of the Patient's Health Belief Questionnaire on Psychiatric Treatment.

Authors:  Carlos De Las Cuevas; Jose de Leon
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Denouncing the use of field-specific effect size distributions to inform magnitude.

Authors:  Emily Panzarella; Nataly Beribisky; Robert A Cribbie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  QT Interval Prolongation Associated with Intramuscular Ziprasidone in Chinese Patients: A Case Report and a Comprehensive Literature Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xian-Bin Li; Yi-Lang Tang; Wei Zheng; Chuan-Yue Wang; Jose de Leon
Journal:  Case Rep Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-04

Review 10.  Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Importance of Observed Effect Sizes: What Do P Values and Confidence Intervals Really Represent?

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Sebastiaan M Bossers; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.