Literature DB >> 2253006

Gallstone clearance: a randomized study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and chemical dissolution.

A Darzi1, A Leahy, C O'Morain, W A Tanner, F B Keane.   

Abstract

Following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy it is not known whether gallstone fragments are cleared from the gallbladder without the use of oral dissolution therapy. To assess the efficacy of lithotripsy and dissolution therapy, alone or in combination, 35 patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups: lithotripsy alone, dissolution therapy alone or combined lithotripsy and dissolution therapy. All patients had symptomatic gallstones, functioning gallbladders and comparable stone profiles. Lithotripsy was administered using a piezoelectric lithotripter. Dissolution therapy consisted of combined bile acid and terpene. Clearance was assessed at 6 months using ultrasound and oral cholecystography. Patients with less than 50 per cent stone clearance at the end of 6 months were considered failures. The number of patients with total or partial clearance in the combined group (7/10) was significantly greater than those in the lithotripsy alone group (0/10, P less than 0.002). Gallstone clearance following lithotripsy appears to be dependent upon dissolution therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2253006     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800771121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

1.  Repeated piezoelectric lithotripsy for gallstones with and without ursodeoxycholic acid dissolution: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Y Tsuchiya; F Ishihara; G Kajiyama; S Nakazawa; M Otho; H Tanimura; Y Akura; M Harada; M Hihara; Y Kawai
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Current alternatives to open cholecystectomy in the management of gallstones.

Authors:  A L Leahy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  ESWL and oral dissolution therapy. What factors influence results?

Authors:  A Buttmann; H E Adamek; J Weber; J F Riemann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The pros and cons of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of gallstone disease.

Authors:  A Darzi; J G Geraghty; N N Williams; S S Sheehan; A N Tanner; F B Keane
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Immediate cystic duct occlusion using an endoluminal absorbable polyglycolic acid screw.

Authors:  R C Bell; G V Stiegmann; J Sun; J Kim; J Durham; M S Lucia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Cost effectiveness of adjuvant bile salt treatment in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of gall bladder stones.

Authors:  J P Nicholl; B Ross; P C Milner; J E Brazier; L Westlake; B Kohler; E Frost; B T Williams; A G Johnson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 23.059

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.