| Literature DB >> 22529844 |
Irina S Kulichevskaya1, Yulia M Serkebaeva, Yongkyu Kim, W Irene C Rijpstra, Jaap S Sinninghe Damsté, Werner Liesack, Svetlana N Dedysh.
Abstract
Members of the phylum Planctomycetes are common inhabitants of northern wetlands. We used barcoded pyrosequencing to survey bacterial diversity in an acidic (pH 4.0) Sphagnum peat sampled from the peat bog Obukhovskoye, European North Russia. A total of 21189 bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained, of which 1081 reads (5.1%) belonged to the Planctomycetes. Two-thirds of these sequences affiliated with planctomycete groups for which characterized representatives have not yet been available. Here, we describe two organisms from one of these previously uncultivated planctomycete groups. One isolate, strain OB3, was obtained from the peat sample used in our molecular study, while another strain, SP2(T) (=DSM 23888(T) = VKM B-2710(T)), was isolated from the peat bog Staroselsky moss. Both isolates are represented by aerobic, budding, pink-pigmented, non-motile, spherical cells that are arranged in unusual, dendriform-like structures during growth on solid media. These bacteria are moderately acidophilic and mesophilic, capable of growth at pH 4.0-7.0 (optimum pH 5.0-5.5) and at 6-30°C (optimum 20-26°C). The preferred growth substrates are various heteropolysaccharides and sugars, the latter being utilized only if provided in low concentrations (≤0.025%). In contrast to other described planctomycetes, strains SP2(T) and OB3 possess weak cellulolytic potential. The major fatty acids are C16:1ω5c, C18:1ω5c, C16:0, and C18:0. Characteristic lipids are the n-C31 polyunsaturated alkene (9-10 double bonds) and C30:1/C32:1 (ω-1) hydroxy fatty acids. The G + C content of the DNA is 58.5-59.0 mol%. Strains SP2(T) and OB3 share identical 16S rRNA gene sequences, which exhibit only 86 and 87% similarity to those of Gemmata obscuriglobus and Zavarzinella formosa. Based on the characteristics reported here, we propose to classify these novel planctomycetes as representatives of a novel genus and species, Telmatocola sphagniphila gen. nov., sp. nov.Entities:
Keywords: Telmatocola sphagniphila gen. nov.; acidic northern wetlands; cellulolytic planctomycete; dendriform cell morphology; sp. nov.; the phylum Planctomycetes
Year: 2012 PMID: 22529844 PMCID: PMC3327967 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Phenotypic characteristics of strains SP2.
| Characteristic | Strain SP2T | Strain OB3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell shape | Spherical | Spherical | Ellipsoidal | Spherical to ovoid |
| Cell size (μm) | 1.2–2.0 | 1.4–2.2 | 2.5–3.2 × 2.0–2.5 | 1.4–3.0 × 1.4–3.0 |
| Motile swarm cells | − | − | + | + |
| Flagellation | − | − | Monotrichous | Polytrichous |
| Rosette formation | + | + | + | − |
| Stalk formation | + | + | + | − |
| Colony color | Pink | Pink | Pink | Rose |
| Salinity tolerance | <0.1% | <0.1% | <0.6% | <0.6% |
| Glucose concentration | ≤0.025% | ≤0.025% | ≤0.05% | ≤0.1% |
| pH growth range | 4.0–7.0 | 4.2–7.0 | 3.8–7.2 | 7.8–8.8 |
| pH optimum | 5.0–5.5 | 5.0–5.8 | 5.5–6.0 | ND |
| Temperature range, °C | 6–30 | 6–30 | 10–30 | 16–35 |
| Temperature optimum, °C | 20–26 | 20–26 | 20–25 | ND |
| Oxidase | − | − | − | |
| Lactose | − | − | + | + |
| Mannose | − | |||
| Sorbose | − | − | + | − |
| Raffinose | + | − | + | − |
| + (<0.01%) | + (<0.01%) | + | + | |
| Pyruvate | − | − | + | − |
| Chondroitin sulfate | − | − | + | + |
| Pectin | − | − | + | + |
| Carboxymethyl cellulose | + | + | − | − |
| Cellulose | W | W | − | − |
| α-Galactosidase | − | − | − | + |
| β-Galactosidase | + | + | − | + |
| Cystine arylamidase | + | + | + | − |
| Valine arylamidase | + | + | + | − |
| w | W | + | + | |
| α-Mannosidase | − | − | − | + |
| DNA G + C content, mol% | 58.5 | 59.0 | 62.5 | 64.4 |
All strains utilized D-glucose, D-galactose, cellobiose, maltose, melizitose, L-rhamnose, ribose, sucrose, trehalose, xylose, salicin, and .
Figure 1The community composition of the . The rarefaction curves show the relation between the retrieval of new planctomycete operational taxonomic units and the number of planctomycete sequences analyzed. Rarefaction analysis was performed at three sequence identity thresholds: 90, 95, and 97% (A). The pie chart shows the taxonomic distribution of the planctomycete sequences retrieved from a total data set of 21189 bacterial 454 sequences (B).
Figure 216S rRNA gene-based neighbor-joining tree showing the phylogenetic position of strains SP2. The root (not shown) was composed of five 16S rRNA gene sequences from anammox planctomycetes (AF375994, AF375995, AY254883, AY257181, AY254882). The scale bar represents 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Figure 3Phase-contrast micrographs of cells and rosette-like cell clusters of strain SP2.
Figure 4Influence of medium pH on the growth of strain SP2.
Figure 5Dynamics of CO. The increase in CO2 concentration in control flasks is due to the utilization of yeast extract used for medium preparation. Data are averages of three flasks ± 1 STDEV. Where error bars are not visible, they are contained within the symbol.
Figure 6Specific detection of cells of strain SP2.
PLFA and neutral lipid composition of strains SP2.
| % Of total | Strain SP2T | Strain OB3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (1) | (2) | (1) | (2) | (1) | (2) | |
| nC14:0 | 2.1 | 1.5 | ||||||
| iC15:0 | 2.9 | 2.3 | ||||||
| nC16:1ω5c | ||||||||
| nC16:0 | 8.0 | 3.7 | 12.3 | 3.7 | 8.0 | 5.4 | 4.8 | 2.7 |
| iC17:0 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | |||
| aiC17:0 | 1.0 | |||||||
| nC17:0 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 2.8 | ||||
| nC18:1ω9c | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||
| nC18:1ω5c | 1.7 | 1.3 | ||||||
| nC18:0 | ||||||||
| nC20:0 | 1.8 | 1.7 | ||||||
| ωOH-C24:0 | ||||||||
| (ω-1)OH-C26:0 | 1.0 | |||||||
| (ω-1)OH-C28:1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 9.0 | |||||
| (ω-1)OH-C28:0 | 1.6 | 8.4 | ||||||
| (ω-1)OH-C30:1 | ||||||||
| (ω-1)OH-C30:0 | 3.0 | |||||||
| (ω-1)OH-C32:1 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 1.5 | |||||
| 4.2 | 5.0 | 7.9 | 8.9 | |||||
| Parkeol | 2.8 | |||||||
(1) Base hydrolyzed extract.
(2) Base hydrolyzed residue after extraction.