Literature DB >> 22529445

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in obese patients.

Gokul Toshniwal1, Vitaly Soskin.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22529445      PMCID: PMC3327059          DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.93368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Anaesth        ISSN: 0019-5049


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Ultrasound-guided (USG) transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is routinely performed in adults for abdominal surgeries like caesarean section and open appendectomy.[12] This block is usually performed in the supine position under ultrasound guidance (in-plane approach). The ideal position of the needle during TAP block is along the anterior axillary line, as the lateral cutaneous branch of the intercostal nerves, which supply the antero-lateral aspect of the abdominal wall, leave the neurovascular plane (TAP) along the mid-or anterior axillary line.[3] In obese patients, the performance of this block can be challenging due to excessive subcutaneous fat and increased depth of TAP. It is recommended that USG-TAP block is performed under real-time ultrasound guidance in obese patients. In the supine position, the subcutaneous fat hangs over the flank and leads to difficulty in probe handling and poor visualization of the needle during the procedure [Figure 1]. Hence, we perform USG-TAP block with the patient in a semilateral position by placing a wedge under their flank on the ipsilateral side of the block, which pushes the subcutaneous fat medially and flattens the procedure field. This makes handling of the ultrasound probe easier and visualization of the needle is also improved because the depth of the TAP is decreased and we are able to introduce the needle at a more obtuse angle in relation to the ultrasound probe [Figure 2].
Figure 1

Line diagram depicting the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in the supine position in obese patients and α=needle-beam angle. The needle-beam angle in the supine position is acute and, therefore, needle visualization is difficult. Also, the handling of the probe is difficult in view of the overhanging subcutaneous fat tissue in the flank region

Figure 2

Line diagram depicting the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in the semilateral position in obese patients and α=needle-beam angle. The subcutaneous fat is pushed medially and, hence, probe handling is easier. In the semilateral position, weare able to achieve better alignment between needle and ultrasound probe and the needle-beam angle is obtuse. Hence, we have better needle visualization in the semilateral position

Line diagram depicting the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in the supine position in obese patients and α=needle-beam angle. The needle-beam angle in the supine position is acute and, therefore, needle visualization is difficult. Also, the handling of the probe is difficult in view of the overhanging subcutaneous fat tissue in the flank region Line diagram depicting the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in the semilateral position in obese patients and α=needle-beam angle. The subcutaneous fat is pushed medially and, hence, probe handling is easier. In the semilateral position, weare able to achieve better alignment between needle and ultrasound probe and the needle-beam angle is obtuse. Hence, we have better needle visualization in the semilateral position Needle-beam angle is one of the most important factors influencing the visualization of the needle during the in-plane approach of an USG procedure.[4] It is difficult to attain a desired (>55 degrees) needle-beam angle with the increasing depth of the target during USG procedures. Hence, we suggest performing USG-TAP block in a semilateral position rather than in a supine position in obese patients, as the handling of the ultrasound probe is easier and needle visualization improves due to better needle-to-probe alignment.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Needle visualization in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Ki Jinn Chin; Anahi Perlas; Vincent W S Chan; Richard Brull
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy.

Authors:  G Niraj; A Searle; M Mathews; V Misra; M Baban; S Kiani; M Wong
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review.

Authors:  P L Petersen; O Mathiesen; H Torup; J B Dahl
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.105

Review 4.  A meta-analysis on the clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane block.

Authors:  Muhammed Rafay Sameem Siddiqui; Muhammed S Sajid; David R Uncles; Liz Cheek; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 9.452

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Efficacy of Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine Versus Bupivacaine Alone for Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Caesarean Section.

Authors:  A Ramya Parameswari; Prabha Udayakumar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-04-26

2.  Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane block through surgical wound.

Authors:  Sunil Rajan; Jerry Paul; Lakshmi Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Ultrasound-guided truncal blocks: A new frontier in regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  Arunangshu Chakraborty; Rakhi Khemka; Taniya Datta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-10

4.  Systemic lidocaine versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia: A comparative randomised study in bariatric surgical patients.

Authors:  Chandan Gupta; Umesh Kumar Valecha; Shri Prakash Singh; Manu Varshney
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-01-07

Review 5.  Ultrasound-guided peripheral abdominal wall blocks.

Authors:  Hermann Dos Santos Fernandes; Artur Salgado de Azevedo; Thiago Camargo Ferreira; Shirley Andrade Santos; Joel Avancini Rocha-Filho; Joaquim Edson Vieira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Managing anesthesia for cesarean section in obese patients: current perspectives.

Authors:  Agnes M Lamon; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2016-08-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.