PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial tested the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) with gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) compared with GC in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (ROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive ROC (recurrence ≥ 6 months after front-line platinum-based therapy) and measurable disease were randomly assigned to GC plus either BV or placebo (PL) for six to 10 cycles. BV or PL, respectively, was then continued until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST; secondary end points were objective response rate, duration of response (DOR), overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 484 patients were randomly assigned. PFS for the BV arm was superior to that for the PL arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.484; 95% CI, 0.388 to 0.605; log-rank P < .0001); median PFS was 12.4 v 8.4 months, respectively. The objective response rate (78.5% v 57.4%; P < .0001) and DOR (10.4 v 7.4 months; HR, 0.534; 95% CI, 0.408 to 0.698) were significantly improved with the addition of BV. No new safety concerns were noted. Grade 3 or higher hypertension (17.4% v < 1%) and proteinuria (8.5% v < 1%) occurred more frequently in the BV arm. The rates of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were similar in both arms. Two patients in the BV arm experienced GI perforation after study treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: GC plus BV followed by BV until progression resulted in a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with GC plus PL in platinum-sensitive ROC.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial tested the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) with gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) compared with GC in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (ROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive ROC (recurrence ≥ 6 months after front-line platinum-based therapy) and measurable disease were randomly assigned to GC plus either BV or placebo (PL) for six to 10 cycles. BV or PL, respectively, was then continued until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST; secondary end points were objective response rate, duration of response (DOR), overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 484 patients were randomly assigned. PFS for the BV arm was superior to that for the PL arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.484; 95% CI, 0.388 to 0.605; log-rank P < .0001); median PFS was 12.4 v 8.4 months, respectively. The objective response rate (78.5% v 57.4%; P < .0001) and DOR (10.4 v 7.4 months; HR, 0.534; 95% CI, 0.408 to 0.698) were significantly improved with the addition of BV. No new safety concerns were noted. Grade 3 or higher hypertension (17.4% v < 1%) and proteinuria (8.5% v < 1%) occurred more frequently in the BV arm. The rates of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were similar in both arms. Two patients in the BV arm experienced GI perforation after study treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: GC plus BV followed by BV until progression resulted in a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with GC plus PL in platinum-sensitive ROC.
Authors: J E Dancey; L E Dodd; R Ford; R Kaplan; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L H Schwartz; L Shankar; P Therasse Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Gavin C E Stuart; Henry Kitchener; Monica Bacon; Andreas duBois; Michael Friedlander; Jonathan Ledermann; Christian Marth; Tate Thigpen; Edward Trimble Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Timothy J Perren; Ann Marie Swart; Jacobus Pfisterer; Jonathan A Ledermann; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Gunnar Kristensen; Mark S Carey; Philip Beale; Andrés Cervantes; Christian Kurzeder; Andreas du Bois; Jalid Sehouli; Rainer Kimmig; Anne Stähle; Fiona Collinson; Sharadah Essapen; Charlie Gourley; Alain Lortholary; Frédéric Selle; Mansoor R Mirza; Arto Leminen; Marie Plante; Dan Stark; Wendi Qian; Mahesh K B Parmar; Amit M Oza Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert A Burger; Mark F Brady; Michael A Bookman; Gini F Fleming; Bradley J Monk; Helen Huang; Robert S Mannel; Howard D Homesley; Jeffrey Fowler; Benjamin E Greer; Matthew Boente; Michael J Birrer; Sharon X Liang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eric Pujade-Lauraine; Uwe Wagner; Elisabeth Aavall-Lundqvist; Val Gebski; Mark Heywood; Paul A Vasey; Birgit Volgger; Ignace Vergote; Sandro Pignata; Annamaria Ferrero; Jalid Sehouli; Alain Lortholary; Gunnar Kristensen; Christian Jackisch; Florence Joly; Chris Brown; Nathalie Le Fur; Andreas du Bois Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Agustin A Garcia; Hal Hirte; Gini Fleming; Dongyun Yang; Denice D Tsao-Wei; Lynda Roman; Susan Groshen; Steve Swenson; Frank Markland; David Gandara; Sidney Scudder; Robert Morgan; Helen Chen; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Amit M Oza Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen A Cannistra; Ursula A Matulonis; Richard T Penson; Julie Hambleton; Jakob Dupont; Howard Mackey; Jeffrey Douglas; Robert A Burger; Deborah Armstrong; Robert Wenham; William McGuire Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert A Burger; Michael W Sill; Bradley J Monk; Benjamin E Greer; Joel I Sorosky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-11-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carol Aghajanian; Barbara Goff; Lawrence R Nycum; Yan V Wang; Amreen Husain; Stephanie V Blank Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Andrea R Hagemann; Akiva P Novetsky; Israel Zighelboim; Feng Gao; L Stewart Massad; Premal H Thaker; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Jason D Wright Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 5.482