Literature DB >> 22529024

Acceptance and safety of the intradermal influenza vaccine among the elderly in Italy: an on-field national study.

Paolo Durando1, Cristiano Alicino, Marisa Alberti, Laura Sticchi, Valter Turello, Lorenzo Marensi, Anna Luisa Caiazzo, Maria Grazia Panico, Francesco Giugliano, Antonino Parlato, Filomena Peluso, Stefano Sgricia, Giancarlo Icardi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An observational multicenter study was carried out in Italy, to evaluate the acceptability and safety of the new intradermal (ID) influenza vaccine (Intanza Sanofi Pasteur SA, Lyon, France) among subjects aged≥60 years, compared with that of other intramuscular (IM) influenza vaccines. Compliance with the use of the ID vaccine by healthcare professionals was also assessed.
METHODS: A previously validated and self-administered questionnaire, Vaccinees' Perception of Injection (VAPI®), consisting of 21 questions, mainly focused on four dimensions (bother, arm movements, sleep, and acceptability), was administered to >1,600 individuals with spontaneous access to outpatient clinics, located in Northern, Central, and Southern Italy, to evaluate the acceptance of the vaccines. Occurrence of solicited and unsolicited side effects and of serious adverse events was assessed in a subset of subjects (n=500), using a clinical diary filled in by vaccinees following immunization. Compliance with the new ID vaccine by healthcare professionals was investigated using an ad-hoc questionnaire.
RESULTS: A very favorable opinion concerning the acceptability of both the vaccines under survey, with the most positive answers ranging between 75.5% and 94.9%, was registered within the study population. Also the compliance by healthcare professionals (n=130) with the novel ID vaccine was favorable. No serious adverse event occurred during the 6-month follow-up period. The frequency of solicited systemic reactions was comparable between the two study groups, while solicited local reactions were significantly higher in the ID-vaccine group than in the IM-vaccine group, even if at values lower than those reported in phase 3 clinical trials (ranges=18.5-32.6% vs. 29.5-70.9%). These local events were mild and transient, thus without any clinical relevance.
CONCLUSION: The novel ID influenza vaccine can be widely recommended in clinical practice, representing a useful tool to improve immunization coverage rates, and thus the control of influenza.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22529024     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-012-0012-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  9 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and Safety of Intradermal Influenza Vaccine in the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Claudia Pileggi; Valentina Mascaro; Aida Bianco; Carmelo G A Nobile; Maria Pavia
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Cross-protection against drifted influenza viruses: options offered by adjuvanted and intradermal vaccines.

Authors:  Andrea Orsi; Filippo Ansaldi; Daniela de Florentiis; Antonella Ceravolo; Valentina Parodi; Paola Canepa; Martina Coppelli; Giancarlo Icardi; Paolo Durando
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Fluzone® intra-dermal (Intanza®/Istivac® Intra-dermal): An updated overview.

Authors:  Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Andrea Orsi; Filippo Ansaldi; Roberto Gasparini; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Head-to-head comparison of an intradermal and a virosome influenza vaccine in patients over the age of 60: evaluation of immunogenicity, cross-protection, safety and tolerability.

Authors:  Filippo Ansaldi; Andrea Orsi; Daniela de Florentiis; Valentina Parodi; Emanuela Rappazzo; Martina Coppelli; Paolo Durando; Giancarlo Icardi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Safety and tolerability of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in the elderly.

Authors:  Paolo Durando; Roberto Rosselli; Ilaria Cremonesi; Andrea Orsi; Erika Albanese; Ilaria Barberis; Chiara Paganino; Cecilia Trucchi; Mariano Martini; Lorenzo Marensi; Valter Turello; The Ligurian Pneumococcal Study Group; Alessandro Bregante; Roberto Cacciani; Rocco Iudici; Diego La Marca; Leonardo Pedano; Amadio Franco Petrucci; Maria Santolini; Valentina Sbisà; Monica Zacconi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Intradermal vaccination for infants and children.

Authors:  Akihiko Saitoh; Yuta Aizawa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Immunogenicity and safety of intradermal influenza vaccine in immunocompromized patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Claudia Pileggi; Francesca Lotito; Aida Bianco; Carmelo G A Nobile; Maria Pavia
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Enhanced passive safety surveillance of three marketed influenza vaccines in the UK and the Republic of Ireland during the 2017/18 season.

Authors:  Sonja Gandhi-Banga; Anne-Laure Chabanon; Cecile Eymin; Timothy Caroe; Karina Butler; Annick Moureau
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Influenza vaccines: unmet needs and recent developments.

Authors:  Ji Yun Noh; Woo Joo Kim
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2013-12-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.