Literature DB >> 22528918

High-spatial-resolution 3-T breast MRI of nonmasslike enhancement lesions: an analysis of their features as significant predictors of malignancy.

Takayoshi Uematsu1, Masako Kasami.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the features of nonmasslike enhancement detected on 3-T MRI and to determine which of these features are significant predictors of malignancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 124 consecutive patients with nonmasslike enhancement detected on 3-T MRI after biopsy or surgery. We described nonmasslike enhancement using the descriptors in the BI-RADS MRI lexicon. In addition to the BI-RADS descriptors, whether clustered ring enhancement was present and whether surrounding high signal intensity (SI) was present on T2-weighted imaging were assessed.
RESULTS: Cancer was identified in 85 lesions (69%). Of these lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) was found in 41 (48%) and invasive cancer in 44 (52%). The features found to be significant predictors of malignancy were segmental (p = 0.001), focal (p = 0.006), dendritic (p = 0.017), and clustered ring enhancement (p = 0.026) and surrounding high SI on T2-weighted imaging (p < 0.0001). The features found to be significant predictors of invasive cancer were dendritic enhancement (p < 0.0001) and surrounding high SI on T2-weighted imaging (p < 0.0001). There were no significant predictive features for DCIS. Homogeneous enhancement was found to be a significant predictor of benignancy (p = 0.001). Kinetic patterns were not significant predictors of malignancy. Nonmasslike enhancement of 1 cm or larger was more often malignant than lesions smaller than 1 cm (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, a lesion size of 1 cm or larger was found to be the only significant predictor of malignancy for nonmasslike enhancement.
CONCLUSION: Segmental, focal, dendritic, and clustered ring enhancement; surrounding high SI on T2-weighted imaging; and a lesion size of 1 cm or larger can act as predictors of malignancy for nonmasslike enhancement detected on 3-T MRI, but kinetic characteristics cannot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22528918     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

1.  The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy.

Authors:  Hale Aydin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy.

Authors:  Tatsunori Asada; Takayuki Yamada; Yoshihide Kanemaki; Keishi Fujiwara; Satoko Okamoto; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  3T-MRI, elastography, digital mammography, and FDG-PET CT findings of subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) of the breast.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Real-time virtual sonography examination and biopsy for suspicious breast lesions identified on MRI alone.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Kaoru Takahashi; Seiichiro Nishimura; Junichiro Watanabe; Seiji Yamasaki; Takashi Sugino; Takuma Oishi; Yuko Kakuda; Mutsu Sato; Tomomi Hayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Real-time virtual sonography (RVS)-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for lesions initially detected with breast MRI.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis and its Mimics on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Pictorial Review of Cases from India.

Authors:  Alison Matich; Seema Sud; T B S Buxi; Vikram Dogra
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2020-08-27

7.  Diagnostic performance of initial enhancement analysis using ultra-fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast lesions.

Authors:  Mariko Goto; Koji Sakai; Hajime Yokota; Maki Kiba; Mariko Yoshida; Hiroshi Imai; Elisabeth Weiland; Isao Yokota; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Differentiation between Clinically Noninflammatory Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis and Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma in situ Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ning Qu; Yahong Luo; Tao Yu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Clumped vs non-clumped internal enhancement patterns in linear non-mass enhancement on breast MRI.

Authors:  Shu Tian Chen; James Covelli; Satoko Okamoto; Bruce L Daniel; Wendy B DeMartini; Debra M Ikeda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Significance of Additional Non-Mass Enhancement in Patients with Breast Cancer on Preoperative 3T Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of the Breast.

Authors:  Yun Hee Cho; Kyu Ran Cho; Eun Kyung Park; Bo Kyoung Seo; Ok Hee Woo; Sung Bum Cho; Jeoung Won Bae
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 0.212

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.