INTRODUCTION: The number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with preformed antibodies waiting for a kidney transplant has been increasing lately. We conducted a nationwide study on the outcomes of kidney transplantation after desensitization in Korea. METHODS: Six transplant centers have run desensitization programs. The patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation after desensitization from 2002 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 86 cases were enrolled. Thirty-five of these were cases of re-transplantation (40.7 %). Indications of desensitization were positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) cross-match responses (CDC(+), 36.0 %), positive flow-cytometric cross-match responses (FCX(+), 54.7 %), and positive donor-specific antibodies (DSA(+), 8.1 %). The desensitization protocols used pre-transplant plasmapheresis (95.3 %), intravenous immunoglobulin (62.8 %), and rituximab (67.4 %). Acute rejection occurred in 18 patients (20.9 %), graft failure occurred in 4 patients, and the 3-year graft survival rate was 93.8 %. The presence of DSA increased the acute rejection rate (P = 0.015) and decreased the 1-year post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.006). Although rejection-free survival rates did not differ significantly between the CDC(+) and FCX(+) groups, the 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in the CDC(+) group (P = 0.010). Infectious and significant bleeding complications occurred in 15.5 % and 4.7 % of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Kidney transplantation after desensitization had good graft outcomes and tolerable complications in Korea, and therefore, this therapy can be recommended for sensitized ESRD patients.
INTRODUCTION: The number of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with preformed antibodies waiting for a kidney transplant has been increasing lately. We conducted a nationwide study on the outcomes of kidney transplantation after desensitization in Korea. METHODS: Six transplant centers have run desensitization programs. The patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation after desensitization from 2002 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 86 cases were enrolled. Thirty-five of these were cases of re-transplantation (40.7 %). Indications of desensitization were positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) cross-match responses (CDC(+), 36.0 %), positive flow-cytometric cross-match responses (FCX(+), 54.7 %), and positive donor-specific antibodies (DSA(+), 8.1 %). The desensitization protocols used pre-transplant plasmapheresis (95.3 %), intravenous immunoglobulin (62.8 %), and rituximab (67.4 %). Acute rejection occurred in 18 patients (20.9 %), graft failure occurred in 4 patients, and the 3-year graft survival rate was 93.8 %. The presence of DSA increased the acute rejection rate (P = 0.015) and decreased the 1-year post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.006). Although rejection-free survival rates did not differ significantly between the CDC(+) and FCX(+) groups, the 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in the CDC(+) group (P = 0.010). Infectious and significant bleeding complications occurred in 15.5 % and 4.7 % of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Kidney transplantation after desensitization had good graft outcomes and tolerable complications in Korea, and therefore, this therapy can be recommended for sensitized ESRDpatients.
Authors: P West-Thielke; H Herren; J Thielke; J Oberholzer; H Sankary; V Raofi; E Benedetti; B Kaplan Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Ashley A Vo; Alice Peng; Mieko Toyoda; Joseph Kahwaji; Kai Cao; Chih-Hung Lai; Nancy L Reinsmoen; Rafael Villicana; Stanley C Jordan Journal: Transplantation Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang; Robert A Montgomery; Lauren M Kucirka; Jonathan C Berger; Daniel S Warren; Dorry L Segev Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Kyu Ha Huh; Soon Il Kim; Dong Jin Joo; Man Ki Ju; Hye Kyung Chang; Hae Jin Kim; Yu Seun Kim; Myoung Soo Kim Journal: Nephron Clin Pract Date: 2008-12-03
Authors: Lorraine C Racusen; Robert B Colvin; Kim Solez; Michael J Mihatsch; Philip F Halloran; Patricia M Campbell; Michael J Cecka; Jean-Pierre Cosyns; Anthony J Demetris; Michael C Fishbein; Agnes Fogo; Peter Furness; Ian W Gibson; Denis Glotz; Pekka Hayry; Lawrence Hunsickern; Michael Kashgarian; Ronald Kerman; Alex J Magil; Robert Montgomery; Kunio Morozumi; Volker Nickeleit; Parmjeet Randhawa; Heinz Regele; Daniel Seron; Surya Seshan; Stale Sund; Kiril Trpkov Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Ashley A Vo; Marina Lukovsky; Mieko Toyoda; Jennifer Wang; Nancy L Reinsmoen; Chih-Hung Lai; Alice Peng; Rafael Villicana; Stanley C Jordan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sun Moon Kim; Chungsik Lee; Jung Pyo Lee; Eun Man Kim; Jongwon Ha; Sang Joon Kim; Myoung Hee Park; Curie Ahn; Yon Su Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Hye Eun Yoon; Bok Jin Hyoung; Hyeon Seok Hwang; So Young Lee; Youn Joo Jeon; Joon Chang Song; Eun-Jee Oh; Sun Cheol Park; Bum Soon Choi; In Sung Moon; Yong Soo Kim; Chul Woo Yang Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 2.153