Literature DB >> 22528026

Inadequate treatment for elderly patients: professional norms and tight budgets could cause "ageism" in hospitals.

Helge Skirbekk1, Per Nortvedt.   

Abstract

We have studied ethical considerations of care among health professionals when treating and setting priorities for elderly patients in Norway. The views of medical doctors and nurses were analysed using qualitative methods. We conducted 21 in depth interviews and 3 focus group interviews in hospitals and general practices. Both doctors and nurses said they treated elderly patients different from younger patients, and often they were given lower priorities. Too little or too much treatment, in the sense of too many interventions and too much drugs, combined with too little care and comfort, was admitted as a relatively frequent yet unwanted consequence of the way clinical priorities were set for elderly patients. This was explained in terms of elderly patients not tolerating the same treatment as younger patients, and questions were raised about the quality of life of many elderly patients after treatment. These explanations were frequently referred to as medically sound decision making. Other explanations had little to do with medically sound decisions. These often included deep frustration with executive guidelines and budget constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 22528026     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-012-0207-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  10 in total

1.  [The physician as advocate--an attempt at an analysis of the Perruche case].

Authors:  Helge Skirbekk
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2003-04-03

2.  Mandates of trust in the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  Helge Skirbekk; Anne-Lise Middelthon; Per Hjortdahl; Arnstein Finset
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-04-15

3.  Moral distress among Norwegian doctors.

Authors:  R Førde; O G Aasland
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  Negotiated or taken-for-granted trust? Explicit and implicit interpretations of trust in a medical setting.

Authors:  Helge Skirbekk
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-05-30

5.  Achieving moral health care: the challenge of patient partiality.

Authors:  V Woodward
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.874

6.  Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students.

Authors:  Dag Album; Steinar Westin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Clinical prioritisations of healthcare for the aged--professional roles.

Authors:  P Nortvedt; R Pedersen; K H Grøthe; M Nordhaug; M Kirkevold; A Slettebø; B S Brinchmann; B Andersen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  In quest of justice? Clinical prioritisation in healthcare for the aged.

Authors:  R Pedersen; P Nortvedt; M Nordhaug; A Slettebø; K H Grøthe; M Kirkevold; B S Brinchmann; B Andersen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Making a difference: a qualitative study on care and priority setting in health care.

Authors:  Helge Skirbekk; Per Nortvedt
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-03

10.  Physicians' views on resource availability and equity in four European health care systems.

Authors:  Samia A Hurst; Reidun Forde; Stella Reiter-Theil; Anne-Marie Slowther; Arnaud Perrier; Renzo Pegoraro; Marion Danis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Ageism and Autonomy in Health Care: Explorations Through a Relational Lens.

Authors:  Laura Pritchard-Jones
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2017-03

2.  Elderly patients with complex health problems in the care trajectory: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  Marianne Kumlin; Geir Vegar Berg; Kari Kvigne; Ragnhild Hellesø
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Evaluating the Impact of the Dementia Care in Hospitals Program (DCHP) on Hospital-Acquired Complications: Study Protocol.

Authors:  Mark Yates; Jennifer J Watts; Kasia Bail; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Sean MacDermott; Jessica C Jebramek; Henry Brodaty
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The decision-making process for unplanned admission to hospital unveiled in hospitalised older adults: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maria Johanna van der Kluit; Geke J Dijkstra; Sophia E de Rooij
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  The influence of ageism on stereotypical attitudes among allied health students in Japan: a group comparison design.

Authors:  Yuko Fukase; Naoto Kamide; Norio Murayama; Akie Kawamura; Kanako Ichikura; Yoshitaka Shiba; Hirokuni Tagaya
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Possible age-related differences in healthcare professionals' perspectives on younger and older patients' autonomy and decision-making in the context of sedation in specialised palliative care: exploratory secondary qualitative content and linguistic conversation analysis of interviews with healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Sandra Kurkowski; Maria Heckel; Larissa Pfaller; Joachim Peters; Jeremias Bazata; Eva Schildmann; Christoph Ostgathe
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.113

7.  Attitudes of health professionals toward elderly patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Zeynep Altın; Ferat Buran
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Factors affecting care of elderly patients among nursing staff at the Ho teaching hospital in Ghana: Implications for geriatric care policy in Ghana.

Authors:  Solomon Mohammed Salia; Peter Adatara; Agani Afaya; Waliu Salisu Jawula; Milipaak Japiong; Abubakari Wuni; Martin Amogre Ayanore; Jacob Erwontaa Bangnidong; Felix Hagan; Dorcas Sam-Mensah; Robert Kaba Alhassan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.