BACKGROUND: Complex anal fistulas remain a challenge for the colorectal surgeon. The anal fistula plug has been developed as a simple treatment for fistula-in-ano. We present and evaluate our experience with the Surgisis anal fistula plug from two centres. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and analysed from consecutive patients undergoing insertion of a fistula plug between January 2007 and October 2009. Fistula plugs were inserted according to a standard protocol. Data collected included patient demographics, fistula characteristics and postoperative outcome. RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent insertion of 62 plugs (27 males, mean age 45.6 years), 25 of whom had prior fistula surgery. Mean follow-up was 10.5 months Twenty-two patients (50%) had successful healing following the insertion of plug with an overall success rate of 23 out of 62 plugs inserted (35%). Nineteen out of 29 patients healed following first-time plug placement, whereas repeated plug placement was successful in 3 out of 15 patients (20%; p = 0.0097). There was a statistically significant difference in the healing rate between patients who had one or less operations prior to plug insertion (i.e. simple fistulas) compared with patients who needed multiple operations (18 out of 24 patients vs. 4 out of 20 patients; p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Success of treatment with the Surgisis anal fistula plug relies on the eradication of sepsis prior to plug placement. Plugs inserted into simple tracts have a higher success rate, and recurrent insertion of plugs following previous plug failure is less likely to be successful. We suggest the fistula plug should remain a first-line treatment for primary surgery and simple tracts.
BACKGROUND: Complex anal fistulas remain a challenge for the colorectal surgeon. The anal fistula plug has been developed as a simple treatment for fistula-in-ano. We present and evaluate our experience with the Surgisis anal fistula plug from two centres. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and analysed from consecutive patients undergoing insertion of a fistula plug between January 2007 and October 2009. Fistula plugs were inserted according to a standard protocol. Data collected included patient demographics, fistula characteristics and postoperative outcome. RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent insertion of 62 plugs (27 males, mean age 45.6 years), 25 of whom had prior fistula surgery. Mean follow-up was 10.5 months Twenty-two patients (50%) had successful healing following the insertion of plug with an overall success rate of 23 out of 62 plugs inserted (35%). Nineteen out of 29 patients healed following first-time plug placement, whereas repeated plug placement was successful in 3 out of 15 patients (20%; p = 0.0097). There was a statistically significant difference in the healing rate between patients who had one or less operations prior to plug insertion (i.e. simple fistulas) compared with patients who needed multiple operations (18 out of 24 patients vs. 4 out of 20 patients; p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Success of treatment with the Surgisis anal fistula plug relies on the eradication of sepsis prior to plug placement. Plugs inserted into simple tracts have a higher success rate, and recurrent insertion of plugs following previous plug failure is less likely to be successful. We suggest the fistula plug should remain a first-line treatment for primary surgery and simple tracts.
Authors: Rasmy Loungnarath; David W Dietz; Matthew G Mutch; Elisa H Birnbaum; Ira J Kodner; James W Fleshman Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2004-02-25 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Mark H Whiteford; John Kilkenny; Neil Hyman; W Donald Buie; Jeffrey Cohen; Charles Orsay; Gary Dunn; W Brian Perry; C Neal Ellis; Jan Rakinic; Sharon Gregorcyk; Paul Shellito; Richard Nelson; Joe J Tjandra; Graham Newstead Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: J R Cintron; J J Park; C P Orsay; R K Pearl; R L Nelson; J H Sone; R Song; H Abcarian Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Jennifer Y Wang; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Jeffrey A Sternberg; Michael E Abel; Madhulika G Varma Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: D K Thekkinkattil; I Botterill; N S Ambrose; L Lundby; P M Sagar; S Buntzen; P J Finan Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: A Herold; A Ommer; A Fürst; F Pakravan; D Hahnloser; B Strittmatter; T Schiedeck; F Hetzer; F Aigner; E Berg; M Roblick; D Bussen; A Joos; S Vershenya Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: J R Cintron; H Abcarian; V Chaudhry; M Singer; S Hunt; E Birnbaum; M G Mutch; J Fleshman Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 3.781