INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to determine what effect access to robotic technology had on our approach to managing apical pelvic support defects. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 187 pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries performed for the 18 months prior to (time period 1: January 2007 to July 2008) and following (time period 2: July 2009 to December 2009) the introduction of the robot. Chi-square was used to compare percentages, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare demographic data among groups. RESULTS: Overall, 187 procedures were performed for apical prolapse during the study period: 61 in time period 1 and 126 in time period 2. Following the introduction of robotic technology, a significant change from vaginal to abdominal reconstruction occurred. Uterosacral ligament suspension declined from 67 % to 22 % (p < 0.0001), whereas sacrocolpopexy increased from 25 % (15/61) to 66 % (83/126) (p < 0.0001). The rate of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, however, declined from 25 % (15/61) to 2 % (2/126) over the two time periods (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The introduction of robotic technology significantly affected the surgical procedure and mode of surgical access for repair of apical pelvic support defects.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to determine what effect access to robotic technology had on our approach to managing apical pelvic support defects. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 187 pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries performed for the 18 months prior to (time period 1: January 2007 to July 2008) and following (time period 2: July 2009 to December 2009) the introduction of the robot. Chi-square was used to compare percentages, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare demographic data among groups. RESULTS: Overall, 187 procedures were performed for apical prolapse during the study period: 61 in time period 1 and 126 in time period 2. Following the introduction of robotic technology, a significant change from vaginal to abdominal reconstruction occurred. Uterosacral ligament suspension declined from 67 % to 22 % (p < 0.0001), whereas sacrocolpopexy increased from 25 % (15/61) to 66 % (83/126) (p < 0.0001). The rate of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, however, declined from 25 % (15/61) to 2 % (2/126) over the two time periods (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The introduction of robotic technology significantly affected the surgical procedure and mode of surgical access for repair of apical pelvic support defects.
Authors: R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Christopher F Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Eva M DeCuyper; Cathy J Nichlos; Kacey V Hickey; Peter O'Rourke Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Femke van Zanten; Cherèl Brem; Egbert Lenters; Ivo A M J Broeders; Steven E Schraffordt Koops Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 2.894