Literature DB >> 22527224

Clinical assessment of deficits after SAH: hasty neurosurgeons and accurate neurologists.

Christian Fung1, Jürgen Beck, Lara Lauber, René Müri, Andreas Raabe, Thomas Nyffeler.   

Abstract

For survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), somatic and cognitive deficits can affect long-term outcomes. We were interested in comparing the deficits identified in SAH patients, including cognitive deficits, at discharge by neurosurgeons and deficits identified by neurologists upon admission to the rehabilitation unit on the same day. The assessment of deficits might have an impact on referring patients to rehabilitation. This retrospective study included 494 SAH patients treated between 2005 and 2010. Of these, 50 patients were discharged to an affiliated rehabilitation unit. Deficits were grouped into 18 categories and summarized into three groups: major somatic, minor somatic, and cognitive deficits. Major somatic deficits were identified in 16 and 20 patients (p = 0.53), minor somatic deficits in 16 and 44 (p < 0.0001) patients, and cognitive deficits in 36 and 45 (p < 0.04) patients by neurosurgeons and neurologists, respectively. The absolute number of deficits in daily activities identified by the neurosurgeon and neurologist were 21 and 31 major somatic deficits (p = 0.2), 18 and 97 minor somatic deficits (p < 0.0001), and 61 and 147 cognitive deficits (p < 0.0001), respectively. Significant differences in assessment of cognitive and minor somatic deficits between neurosurgeons and neurologists exist. Based on these findings, it is evident that for the neurosurgeon, there needs to be an increased awareness of the assessment of cognitive deficits and a more routine interdisciplinary approach, including the use of neuropsychological evaluations, to ensure a better triage of patients to rehabilitation or for discharge home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527224     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-012-6483-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  9 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  Bernhard Meyer; Florian Ringel; Yaroslav Winter; Annika Spottke; Nadir Gharevi; Judith Dams; Monika Balzer-Geldsetzer; Ines K Mueller; Thomas Klockgether; Johannes Schramm; Horst Urbach; Richard Dodel
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Utility of outcome measures after treatment for intracranial aneurysms: a prospective trial involving 520 patients.

Authors:  Dong H Kim; Charles L Haney; Grace Van Ginhoven
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Prevalence and determinants of cognitive complaints after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  P E C A Passier; J M A Visser-Meily; M J E van Zandvoort; M W M Post; G J E Rinkel; C van Heugten
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Health outcomes 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage: An international population-based study. The Australian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study Group.

Authors:  M L Hackett; C S Anderson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: outcomes of early rehabilitation after surgical repair of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  B M Saciri; N Kos
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Psychosocial outcomes at three and nine months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: predictors and prognosis.

Authors:  J Powell; N Kitchen; J Heslin; R Greenwood
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Predictors of global cognitive impairment 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Mellanie V Springer; J Michael Schmidt; Katja E Wartenberg; Jennifer A Frontera; Neeraj Badjatia; Stephan A Mayer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Long-term health-related quality of life after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: relationship with psychological symptoms and personality characteristics.

Authors:  J M Anne Visser-Meily; Marloes L Rhebergen; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Martine J van Zandvoort; Marcel W M Post
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Andrew J Molyneux; Richard S C Kerr; Ly-Mee Yu; Mike Clarke; Mary Sneade; Julia A Yarnold; Peter Sandercock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 3-9       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Screening tools for early neuropsychological impairment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ilari M Rautalin; Martina Sebök; Menno R Germans; Miikka Korja; Noemi Dannecker; Olivia Zindel-Geisseler; Peter Brugger; Luca Regli; Martin N Stienen
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  A Retrospective Study of Survivors of Endovascular Coiling for Posterior and Anterior Aneurysms: Medical and Patient Perspectives.

Authors:  Sarah J Wilson; Ruth Drackford; Michael Holt
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.