Literature DB >> 22527152

Clinical applications of (18)F-FDG PET in the management of hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors.

Anna Maria De Gaetano1, Vittoria Rufini, Paola Castaldi, Anna Maria Gatto, Laura Filograna, Alessandro Giordano, Lorenzo Bonomo.   

Abstract

The assessment of hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors is commonly achieved by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance. The 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) detects increased glucose metabolism associated with neoplastic lesions, provides high accuracy in most cancer imaging applications and is now widely used in clinical practice. However, PET is not always useful and accurate knowledge of appropriate indications is essential for a proper clinical management. (18)F-FDG is transported into cells and phosphorylated by the enzyme hexokinase to (18)F-FDG-6-phosphate, which cannot proceed down the glycolytic pathway and therefore is accumulated in the malignant tissue. PET allows accurate quantification of FDG uptake in tissue, and previous studies have demonstrated that standardized uptake values provide highly reproducible parameters of tumor glucose use (Weber et al., J Nucl Med 40:1771-1777, 1999). The recent development and diffusion of hybrid PET-CT scanners allows functional and anatomic data to be obtained in a single examination, improving lesion localization and resulting in significant diagnostic improvement (Wahl, J Nucl Med 45:82S-95S, 2004). Moreover, CT can be performed diagnostically with the use of intravenous and oral contrast and simultaneous PET-contrast-enhanced CT scanning appears to be an efficient method in cancer evaluation. However, in most centers, a low-dose CT is routinely performed without contrast media infusion.Proper patient preparation, scanning protocol, combined assessment of PET and CT data, and the evaluation of conventional imaging findings are essential to define disease and to avoid diagnostic pitfalls. The role of PET and PET-CT in malignancies of the liver, biliary tract, and pancreas is here reviewed; normal patterns, representative cases, and common pitfalls are also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527152     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-012-9845-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Combined PET-MRI of the abdomen].

Authors:  Tibor Vag; M Eiber; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography diagnostic imaging in multidrug-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma: focus on 2-deoxy-2-(18F)Fluoro-D-Glucose.

Authors:  Ana F Brito; Mónica Mendes; Ana M Abrantes; José G Tralhão; Maria F Botelho
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Response evaluation following neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Chiara Tosolini; Christoph W Michalski; Jörg Kleeff
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-02-27

4.  Impact of 18F-FDG PET/MR based tumor delineation in radiotherapy planning for cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Gauthier Delaby; Bahar Ataeinia; Jennifer Wo; Onofrio Antonio Catalano; Pedram Heidari
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-27

Review 5.  Anatomical, Physiological, and Molecular Imaging for Pancreatic Cancer: Current Clinical Use and Future Implications.

Authors:  John Chang; Donald Schomer; Tomislav Dragovich
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Enhanced primary tumor delineation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma using ultrasmall super paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-ferumoxytol: an initial experience with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Sandeep S Hedgire; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Azadeh Elmi; Sarah Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-04-17

7.  Impact of Plasma Glucose Level at the Time of Fluorodeoxyglucose Administration on the Accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Lesions.

Authors:  Alireza Hamidian Jahromi; Mohammad Kazem Fallahzadeh; Amol Takalkar; Jean Sheng; Gazi Zibari; Hosein Shokouh Amiri
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 8.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongyong Zhu; Lisha Wang; Hanfei Zhang; Jie Chen; Yanfang Wang; Sama Byanju; Meiyan Liao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Intrahepatic Cholangiolocellular and Cholangiocellular Carcinoma - Differences in the 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings.

Authors:  Yoshiko Takahashi; Shuichi Sato; Hitomi Ishitobi; Makoto Nagaoka; Yoshiya Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Fukuhara; Mika Yuki; Yoshinori Komazawa; Hiroyuki Kuroda; Toshihiro Shizuku
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.271

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.