PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of levosimendan in neonates with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS:Neonates undergoing risk-adjusted classification for congenital heart surgery (RACHS) 3 and 4 procedures were randomized to receive either a 72 h continuous infusion of 0.1 μg/kg/min levosimendan or standard post-CPB inotrope infusion. RESULTS:Sixty-three patients (32 cases and 31 controls) were recruited. There were no differences between groups regarding demographic and baseline clinical data. No side effects were observed. There were no significant differences in mortality (1 vs. 3 patients, p = 0.35), length of mechanical ventilation (5.9 ± 5 vs. 6.9 ± 8 days, p = 0.54), and pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) stay (11 ± 8 vs. 14 ± 14 days, p = 0.26). Low cardiac output syndrome occurred in 37 % of levosimendan patients and in 61 % of controls (p = 0.059, OR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.14-1.0). Postoperative heart rate, with a significant difference at 6 (p = 0.008), 12 (p = 0.037), and 24 h (p = 0.046), and lactate levels, with a significant difference at PCICU admission (p = 0.015) and after 6 h (p = 0.048), were lower in the levosimendan group. Inotropic score was significantly lower in the levosimendan group at PCICU admission, after 6 h and after 12 h, (p < 0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, a lower lactate level 6 h after PCICU admission was independently associated with levosimendan administration after correction for CPB time and the need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. CONCLUSIONS:Levosimendan infused in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery was well tolerated with a potential benefit of levosimendan on postoperative hemodynamic and metabolic parameters of RACHS 3-4 neonates.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of levosimendan in neonates with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: Neonates undergoing risk-adjusted classification for congenital heart surgery (RACHS) 3 and 4 procedures were randomized to receive either a 72 h continuous infusion of 0.1 μg/kg/min levosimendan or standard post-CPB inotrope infusion. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (32 cases and 31 controls) were recruited. There were no differences between groups regarding demographic and baseline clinical data. No side effects were observed. There were no significant differences in mortality (1 vs. 3 patients, p = 0.35), length of mechanical ventilation (5.9 ± 5 vs. 6.9 ± 8 days, p = 0.54), and pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) stay (11 ± 8 vs. 14 ± 14 days, p = 0.26). Low cardiac output syndrome occurred in 37 % of levosimendanpatients and in 61 % of controls (p = 0.059, OR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.14-1.0). Postoperative heart rate, with a significant difference at 6 (p = 0.008), 12 (p = 0.037), and 24 h (p = 0.046), and lactate levels, with a significant difference at PCICU admission (p = 0.015) and after 6 h (p = 0.048), were lower in the levosimendan group. Inotropic score was significantly lower in the levosimendan group at PCICU admission, after 6 h and after 12 h, (p < 0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, a lower lactate level 6 h after PCICU admission was independently associated with levosimendan administration after correction for CPB time and the need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. CONCLUSIONS:Levosimendan infused in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery was well tolerated with a potential benefit of levosimendan on postoperative hemodynamic and metabolic parameters of RACHS 3-4 neonates.
Authors: Lesley Wood; Matthias Egger; Lise Lotte Gluud; Kenneth F Schulz; Peter Jüni; Douglas G Altman; Christian Gluud; Richard M Martin; Anthony J G Wood; Jonathan A C Sterne Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-03-03
Authors: Michael J Bonios; John V Terrovitis; Stavros G Drakos; Fotis Katsaros; Chris Pantsios; Serafim N Nanas; John Kanakakis; George Alexopoulos; Savvas Toumanidis; Maria Anastasiou-Nana; John N Nanas Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Pasi Lahtinen; Otto Pitkänen; Pekka Pölönen; Anu Turpeinen; Vesa Kiviniemi; Ari Uusaro Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: L Tritapepe; V De Santis; D Vitale; M Santulli; A Morelli; I Nofroni; P E Puddu; M Singer; P Pietropaoli Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2006-04-04 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Michael G Gaies; James G Gurney; Alberta H Yen; Michelle L Napoli; Robert J Gajarski; Richard G Ohye; John R Charpie; Jennifer C Hirsch Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Konstantin Averin; Chet Villa; Catherine D Krawczeski; Jesse Pratt; Eileen King; John L Jefferies; David P Nelson; David S Cooper; Thomas D Ryan; Jaclyn Sawyer; Jeffrey A Towbin; Angela Lorts Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Alexander Van De Bruaene; Lukas Meier; Walter Droogne; Pieter De Meester; Els Troost; Marc Gewillig; Werner Budts Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Marc Bonten; Maurizio Cecconi; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; J R Curtis; Goran Hedenstierna; Michael Joannidis; Duncan Macrae; Salvatore M Maggiore; Jordi Mancebo; Alexandre Mebazaa; Jean-Charles Preiser; Patricia Rocco; Jean-François Timsit; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 17.440