Literature DB >> 22527007

Non-invasive estimation of cerebrospinal fluid pressure waveforms by means of retinal venous pulsatility and central aortic blood pressure.

S Mojtaba Golzan1, Mi Ok Kim, Amir Saied Seddighi, Alberto Avolio, Stuart L Graham.   

Abstract

Current techniques used for cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFp) measurements are invasive. They require a surgical procedure for placement of a pressure catheter in the brain ventricles or in the brain tissue. The human eye provides direct visualisation of its physiological structures and due to its anatomical connection with CSF via the retrolaminar optic nerve it may provide accessible information about CSFp. A total of 25 subjects were included in this study. 15 subjects were used to characterise the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP), spontaneous retinal venous pulsatility (SRVP), and CSFp. IOP was manipulated and SRVP amplitudes recorded dynamically using the dynamic vessel analyzer (DVA). The relationship between IOP and SRVP amplitude was established to estimate CSFp. Additionally Doppler blood flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery and arterial blood pressure (ABP) were acquired for all subjects. This was to compare and validate our findings with an alternative approach (ICM+) which uses these values to estimate CSFp. A CSFp waveform was extracted from central blood pressure (CBP) waveform by removing its cardiac component frequency. Furthermore to calibrate the CSFp to CBP waveform ratio, invasive CSFp, and ABP was measured from 10 subjects with brain tumours who had a range of normal to elevated CSFp (i.e., 0-30 mmHg). Results show good agreement between the two methods (correlation r (2) = 0.55) Mean estimated CSFp for the two techniques did not show any significant difference (p > 0.05). A significant correlation between CBP pulse (CBPp) and invasive CSFp pulse (CSFpp) was observed (i.e., CSFpp = 0.0654CBBp + 3.91, p < 0.01). Estimated CSFpp was calibrated to CBPp according to this relation. In conclusion, the study demonstrated a good correlation between two different methods of estimating CSFp non-invasively and may provide a novel method to estimate CSF waveforms non-invasively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527007     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-012-0563-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  4 in total

1.  Heart rate and age modulate retinal pulsatile patterns.

Authors:  Ivana Labounková; René Labounek; Radim Kolář; Ralf P Tornow; Charles F Babbs; Collin M McClelland; Benjamin R Miller; Igor Nestrašil
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 2.  Literature review and meta-analysis of translaminar pressure difference in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  L Siaudvytyte; I Januleviciene; A Daveckaite; A Ragauskas; L Bartusis; J Kucinoviene; B Siesky; A Harris
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  System for Rapid, Precise Modulation of Intraocular Pressure, toward Minimally-Invasive In Vivo Measurement of Intracranial Pressure.

Authors:  Max A Stockslager; Brian C Samuels; R Rand Allingham; Zoe A Klesmith; Stephen A Schwaner; Craig R Forest; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  In vivo optic nerve head mechanical response to intraocular and cerebrospinal fluid pressure: imaging protocol and quantification method.

Authors:  Massimo A Fazio; Mark E Clark; Luigi Bruno; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.