Literature DB >> 22526960

Predictive value of early and late residual 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorothymidine uptake using different SUV measurements in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib.

Carsten Kobe1, Matthias Scheffler, Arne Holstein, Thomas Zander, Lucia Nogova, Adriaan A Lammertsma, Ronald Boellaard, Bernd Neumaier, Roland T Ullrich, Markus Dietlein, Jürgen Wolf, Deniz Kahraman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive value of early and late residual (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and (18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) uptake using different SUV measurements in PET in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with erlotinib.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 30 patients with untreated stage IV NSCLC who had undergone a combined FDG PET and FLT PET scan at 1 week (early) and 6 weeks (late) after the start of erlotinib treatment. Early and late residual FDG and FLT uptake were measured in up to five lesions per scan with different quantitative standardized uptake values (SUV(max), SUV(2Dpeak), SUV(3Dpeak), SUV(50), SUV(A50), SUV(A41)) and compared with short-term outcome (progression vs. nonprogression after 6 weeks of erlotinib treatment). Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for detecting nonprogression after 6 weeks. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to evaluate the association between residual uptake and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: Nonprogression after 6 weeks was associated with a significantly lower early and late residual FDG uptake, measured with different quantitative parameters. In contrast, nonprogression after 6 weeks was not associated with early and late residual FLT uptake. Furthermore, patients with a lower early residual FDG uptake measured in terms of SUV(max) and SUV(2Dpeak) had a significantly prolonged PFS (282 days vs. 118 days; p = 0.022) than patients with higher values. Similarly, lower late residual FDG uptake and early residual FLT uptake measured in terms of SUV(3Dpeak), SUV(A50) and SUV(A41), and late FLT uptake measured in terms of SUV(3Dpeak) and SUV(A50) was associated with an improved PFS.
CONCLUSION: Early and late residual FDG uptake, measured using different quantitative SUV parameters, are predictive factors for short-term outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with erlotinib. Additionally, low residual FDG and FLT uptake early and late in the course of erlotinib treatment is associated with improved PFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526960     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-012-2118-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of histological response of paediatric bone sarcomas using FDG PET in comparison to morphological volume measurement and standardized MRI parameters.

Authors:  Timm Denecke; Patrick Hundsdörfer; Daniel Misch; Ingo G Steffen; Stefan Schönberger; Christian Furth; Michail Plotkin; Juri Ruf; Hubertus Hautzel; Brigitte Stöver; Regine Kluge; Uta Bierbach; Sylke Otto; James F Beck; Christiane Franzius; Günter Henze; Holger Amthauer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Quantitative analysis of response to treatment with erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer using 18F-FDG and 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET.

Authors:  Deniz Kahraman; Matthias Scheffler; Thomas Zander; Lucia Nogova; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard; Bernd Neumaier; Roland T Ullrich; Arne Holstein; Markus Dietlein; Jürgen Wolf; Carsten Kobe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; R Boellaard; Otto S Hoekstra; Jos W R Twisk; Corneline J Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Corneline J Hoekstra; Sigrid G Stroobants; Egbert F Smit; Johan Vansteenkiste; Harm van Tinteren; Pieter E Postmus; Richard P Golding; Bonne Biesma; Frans J H M Schramel; Nico van Zandwijk; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Changes in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine positron emission tomography imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib.

Authors:  Linda Mileshkin; Rodney J Hicks; Brett G M Hughes; Paul L R Mitchell; Veena Charu; Barbara J Gitlitz; David Macfarlane; Benjamin Solomon; Lukas C Amler; Wei Yu; Andrea Pirzkall; Bernard M Fine
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Early prediction of nonprogression in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib by using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose and [(18)F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Thomas Zander; Matthias Scheffler; Lucia Nogova; Carsten Kobe; Walburga Engel-Riedel; Martin Hellmich; Irini Papachristou; Karin Toepelt; Andreas Draube; Lukas Heukamp; Reinhard Buettner; Yon D Ko; Roland T Ullrich; Egbert Smit; Ronald Boellaard; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Michael Hallek; Andreas H Jacobs; Andreas Schlesinger; Karin Schulte; Silvia Querings; Erich Stoelben; Bernd Neumaier; Roman K Thomas; Markus Dietlein; Jürgen Wolf
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  An initial experience with FDG-PET in the imaging of residual disease after induction therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Tim Akhurst; Robert J Downey; Michelle S Ginsberg; Mithat Gonen; Manjit Bains; Robert Korst; Robert J Ginsberg; Valerie W Rusch; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Mike J O'Doherty; Wolfgang A Weber; Felix M Mottaghy; Markus N Lonsdale; Sigrid G Stroobants; Wim J G Oyen; Joerg Kotzerke; Otto S Hoekstra; Jan Pruim; Paul K Marsden; Klaus Tatsch; Corneline J Hoekstra; Eric P Visser; Bertjan Arends; Fred J Verzijlbergen; Josee M Zijlstra; Emile F I Comans; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Anne M Paans; Antoon T Willemsen; Thomas Beyer; Andreas Bockisch; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Dominique Delbeke; Richard P Baum; Arturo Chiti; Bernd J Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  18 in total

1.  The engagement of FDG PET/CT image quality and harmonized quantification: from competitive to complementary.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Optimisation and harmonisation: two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Single-scan dual-tracer FLT+FDG PET tumor characterization.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; Thomas C Rust; John M Hoffman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorothymidine versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on pulmonary lesions: A meta analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Li; Dong Dai; Xiu-Yu Song; Jian-Jing Liu; Yan-Jia Zhu; Wen-Gui Xu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-09

5.  TLG-S criteria are superior to both EORTC and PERCIST for predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma treated with erlotinib.

Authors:  Kung-Chu Ho; Yu-Hua Dean Fang; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Yuan-Chang Liu; John Wen-Cheng Chang; Ming-Mo Hou; Cheng-Ta Yang; Nai-Ming Cheng; Tzu-Pei Su; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  A Review of the Correlation Between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Status and 18F-FDG Metabolic Activity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Maoqing Jiang; Xiaohui Zhang; Yan Chen; Ping Chen; Xiuyu Guo; Lijuan Ma; Qiaoling Gao; Weiqi Mei; Jingfeng Zhang; Jianjun Zheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  New strategy for monitoring targeted therapy: molecular imaging.

Authors:  Fei-Fei Teng; Xue Meng; Xin-Dong Sun; Jin-Ming Yu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-09-30

8.  [¹⁸F]FDG positron emission tomography within two weeks of starting erlotinib therapy can predict response in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Mammar Hachemi; Olivier Couturier; Laurent Vervueren; Pacôme Fosse; Franck Lacœuille; Thierry Urban; José Hureaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response.

Authors:  Bal Sanghera; Wai Lup Wong; Luke I Sonoda; Gwen Beynon; Andreas Makris; David Woolf; Kirit Ardeshna
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-04

10.  Alternative and New Radiopharmaceutical Agents for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Silvi Telo; Letizia Calderoni; Sara Vichi; Federico Zagni; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Curr Radiopharm       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.