Literature DB >> 22526926

Plants as models for chromium and nickel risk assessment.

A Fargašová1.   

Abstract

The adverse effects of Cr(III), Cr(VI), and Ni(II) expressed as root and shoot growth inhibition, metal accumulation and translocation throughout plants, and genotoxicity study were examined. To examine phytoxicity and metal accumulation, Vicia sativa, Raphanus sativus, Zea mays and Sinapis alba plants were used. Except for S. alba root growth inhibition, Ni had the strongest inhibitory effect on root and shoot growth. The inhibitory rank order based on IC₅₀ values was Ni(II) > Cr(VI) > Cr(III). Z. mays was the least sensitive to all metals. While the accumulation of Cr was higher in the roots than the upper plant parts, Ni transport to shoots was at least two times higher than that of Cr. The highest accumulation of Cr was found in Z. mays and that of Ni in V. sativa and Z. mays roots. For all plants, the translocation factor was higher for Cr(VI) than for Cr(III). The translocation factor for Ni was several times higher than those of Cr. For mutagenicity assay, root tips of V. sativa, R. sativus and Z. mays were used. All metals exerted a significant increase of chromosomal aberrations and the rank order of aberrations was: Cr(VI) > Ni(II) > Cr(III). Genotoxic effects of metals were also determined by analysis of micronuclei frequency in the pollen tetrads of Tradescantia plants. None of metals significantly stimulated micronuclei frequency and the genotoxic effect decreased in the following order: Cr(VI) ≥ Ni(II) > Cr(III).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526926     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-012-0901-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  23 in total

1.  Distribution of heavy metals in wheat, mustard, and weed grown in field irrigated with industrial effluents.

Authors:  S C Barman; R K Sahu; S K Bhargava; C Chaterjee
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Effects of nickel(II) on nuclear protein binding to DNA in intact mammalian cells.

Authors:  S R Patierno; M Costa
Journal:  Cancer Biochem Biophys       Date:  1987-05

Review 3.  Future research directions in cancer ecogenetics.

Authors:  G S Omenn
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Effects of chromium and nickel on germination and growth in tolerant and non-tolerant populations of Echinochloa colona (L.) Link.

Authors:  G R Rout; S Samantaray; P Das
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 5.  Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants.

Authors:  C Cervantes; J Campos-García; S Devars; F Gutiérrez-Corona; H Loza-Tavera; J C Torres-Guzmán; R Moreno-Sánchez
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  A comparative study of cadmium phytoextraction by accumulator and weed species.

Authors:  Moyukh Ghosh; S P Singh
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Detection of genotoxic effects of heavy metal contaminated soils with plant bioassays.

Authors:  S Knasmüller; E Gottmann; H Steinkellner; A Fomin; C Pickl; A Paschke; R Göd; M Kundi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Hyperaccumulator Alyssum murale relies on a different metal storage mechanism for cobalt than for nickel.

Authors:  R Tappero; E Peltier; M Gräfe; K Heidel; M Ginder-Vogel; K J T Livi; M L Rivers; M A Marcus; R L Chaney; D L Sparks
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

9.  Cytogenetic effects of leachates from tannery solid waste on the somatic cells of Vicia faba.

Authors:  Saurabh Chandra; L K S Chauhan; P N Pande; S K Gupta
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.119

10.  Mutagenic effects of chromium trioxide on root tip cells of Vicia faba.

Authors:  Xiao-Wei Qian
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci       Date:  2004-12
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Too much is bad--an appraisal of phytotoxicity of elevated plant-beneficial heavy metal ions.

Authors:  Naser A Anjum; Harminder P Singh; M Iqbal R Khan; Asim Masood; Tasir S Per; Asha Negi; Daizy R Batish; Nafees A Khan; Armando C Duarte; Eduarda Pereira; Iqbal Ahmad
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Protective role of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment on defense systems and BnMP1 gene expression in Cr(VI)-stressed canola seedlings.

Authors:  Mustafa Yıldız; Hakan Terzi; Nagihan Bingül
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Assessment of both environmental cytotoxicity and trace metal pollution using Populus simonii Carr. as a bioindicator.

Authors:  Victor Sluchyk; Iryna Sluchyk; Alexander Shyichuk
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Plant Recovery after Metal Stress-A Review.

Authors:  Jagna Chmielowska-Bąk; Joanna Deckert
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-27

Review 5.  A comprehensive review on the sources, essentiality and toxicological profile of nickel.

Authors:  Wasefa Begum; Summi Rai; Soujanya Banerjee; Sudip Bhattacharjee; Monohar Hossain Mondal; Ajaya Bhattarai; Bidyut Saha
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.361

6.  Phytoremediation of electroplating wastewater by vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanoides L.).

Authors:  Andhika Puspito Nugroho; Erni Saurmalinda Butar Butar; Ekaputra Agung Priantoro; Lies Sriwuryandari; Zulfa Berliana Pratiwi; Tarzan Sembiring
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Chromium and nickel in Pteridium aquilinum from environments with various levels of these metals.

Authors:  Kamila Kubicka; Aleksandra Samecka-Cymerman; Krzysztof Kolon; Piotr Kosiba; Alexander J Kempers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.223

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.