Christa M Helms1, Megan N McClintick, Kathleen A Grant. 1. Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA. helmsc@ohsu.edu
Abstract
RATIONALE: Dominance hierarchies affect ethanol self-administration, with greater intake among subordinate animals compared to dominant animals. Excessive ethanol intake disrupts circadian rhythms. Diurnal rhythms of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis have not been characterized in the context of ethanol self-administration with regard to social rank. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether diurnal pituitary-adrenal hormonal rhythms account for differences between social ranks in ethanol self-administration or are differentially affected by ethanol self-administration between social ranks. METHODS: During alternating individual (n = 11-12) and social (n = 3 groups) housing of male cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis), diurnal measures of cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) were obtained from plasma samples three times per week. Social rank was determined, ethanol (4 %, w/v) self-administration was induced, and then the monkeys were allowed a choice of water or ethanol for 22 h/day for 49 weeks. RESULTS: For all social ranks, plasma ACTH was elevated during social housing, but cortisol was stable, although greater among dominant monkeys. Ethanol self-administration blunted the effect of social housing, cortisol, and the diurnal rhythm for both hormones, regardless of daily ethanol intake (1.2-4.2 g/kg/day). Peak ACTH and cortisol were more likely to be observed in the morning during ethanol access. Ethanol, not vehicle, intake was lower during social housing across social ranks. Only dominant monkeys showed significantly lower blood-ethanol concentration during social housing. CONCLUSIONS: There was a low threshold for disruption of diurnal pituitary rhythms by ethanol drinking, but sustained adrenal corticosteroid rhythms. Protection against heavy drinking among dominant monkeys may have constrained ethanol intoxication, possibly to preserve dominance rank.
RATIONALE: Dominance hierarchies affect ethanol self-administration, with greater intake among subordinate animals compared to dominant animals. Excessive ethanol intake disrupts circadian rhythms. Diurnal rhythms of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis have not been characterized in the context of ethanol self-administration with regard to social rank. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether diurnal pituitary-adrenal hormonal rhythms account for differences between social ranks in ethanol self-administration or are differentially affected by ethanol self-administration between social ranks. METHODS: During alternating individual (n = 11-12) and social (n = 3 groups) housing of male cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis), diurnal measures of cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) were obtained from plasma samples three times per week. Social rank was determined, ethanol (4 %, w/v) self-administration was induced, and then the monkeys were allowed a choice of water or ethanol for 22 h/day for 49 weeks. RESULTS: For all social ranks, plasma ACTH was elevated during social housing, but cortisol was stable, although greater among dominant monkeys. Ethanol self-administration blunted the effect of social housing, cortisol, and the diurnal rhythm for both hormones, regardless of daily ethanol intake (1.2-4.2 g/kg/day). Peak ACTH and cortisol were more likely to be observed in the morning during ethanol access. Ethanol, not vehicle, intake was lower during social housing across social ranks. Only dominant monkeys showed significantly lower blood-ethanol concentration during social housing. CONCLUSIONS: There was a low threshold for disruption of diurnal pituitary rhythms by ethanol drinking, but sustained adrenal corticosteroid rhythms. Protection against heavy drinking among dominant monkeys may have constrained ethanol intoxication, possibly to preserve dominance rank.
Authors: Drake Morgan; Kathleen A Grant; H Donald Gage; Robert H Mach; Jay R Kaplan; Osric Prioleau; Susan H Nader; Nancy Buchheimer; Richard L Ehrenkaufer; Michael A Nader Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: D H Abbott; E B Keverne; F B Bercovitch; C A Shively; S P Mendoza; W Saltzman; C T Snowdon; T E Ziegler; M Banjevic; T Garland; R M Sapolsky Journal: Horm Behav Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.587
Authors: Thomas J Balkin; Allen R Braun; Nancy J Wesensten; Keith Jeffries; Mary Varga; Paul Baldwin; Gregory Belenky; Peter Herscovitch Journal: Brain Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: J A Vivian; H L Green; J E Young; L S Majerksy; B W Thomas; C A Shively; J R Tobin; M A Nader; K A Grant Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Christa M Helms; Andrew Rau; Jessica Shaw; Cara Stull; Steven W Gonzales; Kathleen A Grant Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Vanessa A Jimenez; Daicia C Allen; Megan N McClintick; Kathleen A Grant Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Klaus A Miczek; Joseph F DeBold; Lara S Hwa; Emily L Newman; Rosa M M de Almeida Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Christa M Helms; Steven W Gonzales; Heather L Green; Kendall T Szeliga; Laura S M Rogers; Kathleen A Grant Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: James B Daunais; April T Davenport; Christa M Helms; Steven W Gonzales; Scott E Hemby; David P Friedman; Jonathan P Farro; Erich J Baker; Kathleen A Grant Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 3.455