RATIONALE: Although reports of dextromethorphan (DXM) abuse have increased recently, few studies have examined the effects of high doses of DXM. OBJECTIVE: This study in humans evaluated the effects of supratherapeutic doses of DXM and triazolam. METHODS: Single, acute oral doses of DXM (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, and 800 mg/70 kg), triazolam (0.25 and 0.5 mg/70 kg), and placebo were administered to 12 healthy volunteers with histories of hallucinogen use, under double-blind conditions, using an ascending dose run-up design. Subjective, behavioral, and physiological effects were assessed repeatedly after drug administration for 6 h. RESULTS:Triazolam produced dose-related increases in subject-rated sedation, observer-rated sedation, and behavioral impairment. DXM produced a profile of dose-related physiological and subjective effects differing from triazolam. DXM effects included increases in blood pressure, heart rate, and emesis; increases in observer-rated effects typical of classic hallucinogens (e.g., distance from reality, visual effects with eyes open and closed, joy, anxiety); and participant ratings of stimulation (e.g., jittery, nervous), somatic effects (e.g., tingling, headache), perceptual changes, end-of-session drug liking, and mystical-type experience. After 400 mg/70 kg DXM, 11 of 12 participants indicated on a pharmacological class questionnaire that they thought they had received a classic hallucinogen (e.g., psilocybin). Drug effects resolved without significant adverse effects by the end of the session. In a 1-month follow-up, volunteers attributed increased spirituality and positive changes in attitudes, moods, and behavior to the session experiences. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of DXM produced effects distinct from triazolam and had characteristics that were similar to the classic hallucinogen psilocybin.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Although reports of dextromethorphan (DXM) abuse have increased recently, few studies have examined the effects of high doses of DXM. OBJECTIVE: This study in humans evaluated the effects of supratherapeutic doses of DXM and triazolam. METHODS: Single, acute oral doses of DXM (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, and 800 mg/70 kg), triazolam (0.25 and 0.5 mg/70 kg), and placebo were administered to 12 healthy volunteers with histories of hallucinogen use, under double-blind conditions, using an ascending dose run-up design. Subjective, behavioral, and physiological effects were assessed repeatedly after drug administration for 6 h. RESULTS:Triazolam produced dose-related increases in subject-rated sedation, observer-rated sedation, and behavioral impairment. DXM produced a profile of dose-related physiological and subjective effects differing from triazolam. DXM effects included increases in blood pressure, heart rate, and emesis; increases in observer-rated effects typical of classic hallucinogens (e.g., distance from reality, visual effects with eyes open and closed, joy, anxiety); and participant ratings of stimulation (e.g., jittery, nervous), somatic effects (e.g., tingling, headache), perceptual changes, end-of-session drug liking, and mystical-type experience. After 400 mg/70 kg DXM, 11 of 12 participants indicated on a pharmacological class questionnaire that they thought they had received a classic hallucinogen (e.g., psilocybin). Drug effects resolved without significant adverse effects by the end of the session. In a 1-month follow-up, volunteers attributed increased spirituality and positive changes in attitudes, moods, and behavior to the session experiences. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of DXM produced effects distinct from triazolam and had characteristics that were similar to the classic hallucinogenpsilocybin.
Authors: Roland R Griffiths; Matthew W Johnson; William A Richards; Brian D Richards; Una McCann; Robert Jesse Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Miguel Fribourg; José L Moreno; Terrell Holloway; Davide Provasi; Lia Baki; Rahul Mahajan; Gyu Park; Scott K Adney; Candice Hatcher; José M Eltit; Jeffrey D Ruta; Laura Albizu; Zheng Li; Adrienne Umali; Jihyun Shim; Alexandre Fabiato; Alexander D MacKerell; Vladimir Brezina; Stuart C Sealfon; Marta Filizola; Javier González-Maeso; Diomedes E Logothetis Journal: Cell Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Frederick S Barrett; Theresa M Carbonaro; Ethan Hurwitz; Matthew W Johnson; Roland R Griffiths Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Theresa M Carbonaro; Matthew W Johnson; Ethan Hurwitz; Roland R Griffiths Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Lawrence P Carter; Chad J Reissig; Matthew W Johnson; Margaret A Klinedinst; Roland R Griffiths; Miriam Z Mintzer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-09-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Chad J Reissig; Joseph A Harrison; Lawrence P Carter; Roland R Griffiths Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Katherine A MacLean; Matthew W Johnson; Chad J Reissig; Thomas E Prisinzano; Roland R Griffiths Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-11-08 Impact factor: 4.530