Literature DB >> 22526185

[Comments on pyeloplasty - laparoscopic versus robotic].

M Fisch1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22526185     DOI： 10.1007/s00120-012-2883-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN： 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Complete daVinci versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: cost analysis.

Authors:  Sam B Bhayani; Richard E Link; John M Varkarakis; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong Mei; Jiarui Pu; Chunlei Yang; Huanyu Zhang; Liduan Zheng; Qiangsong Tong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.

Authors:  Luis H P Braga; Kenneth Pace; Jorge DeMaria; Armando J Lorenzo
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 20.096
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.