Literature DB >> 22526017

Distinct disease-risk groups in pediatric supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas.

Catherine Godfraind1, Joanna M Kaczmarska, Mehmet Kocak, James Dalton, Karen D Wright, Robert A Sanford, Fredrick A Boop, Amar Gajjar, Thomas E Merchant, David W Ellison.   

Abstract

No reliable classification is in clinical use for the therapeutic stratification of children with ependymoma, such that disease risk might be identified and patients treated to ensure a combination of maximal cure rates and minimal adverse therapeutic effects. This study has examined associations between clinicopathologic and cytogenetic variables and outcome in a trial cohort of children with ependymoma, with the aim of defining a practical scheme for stratifying this heterogeneous tumor. Intracranial ependymomas (n = 146) from children treated on the RT1 trial at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital were evaluated for the status of multiple pathological features. Interphase FISH (iFISH) defined the status of loci on chromosomes 1q (EXO1), 6q (LATS1) and 9, including 9p21 (CDKN2A). Data relating to these clinicopathological and cytogenetic variables were compared with survival data in order to model disease risk groups. Extent of surgical resection was a significant determinant of outcome in both supratentorial and infratentorial compartments. Tumor cell density and mitotic count were associated with outcome among children with posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 119). Among pathologic features, only brain invasion was associated with outcome in children with supratentorial ependymomas (n = 27). For posterior fossa tumors, gain of 1q was independently associated with outcome and in combination with clinicopathological variables defined both a two-tier and three-tier system of disease risk. Among children developing posterior fossa ependymomas treated with maximal surgical resection and conformal radiotherapy, key clinicopathological variables and chromosome 1q status can be used to define tiers of disease risk. In contrast, risk factors for pediatric supratentorial tumors are limited to sub-total resection and brain invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526017      PMCID: PMC3554251          DOI: 10.1007/s00401-012-0981-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neuropathol        ISSN: 0001-6322            Impact factor:   17.088


  32 in total

1.  Genomic imbalances in pediatric intracranial ependymomas define clinically relevant groups.

Authors:  Sara Dyer; Emma Prebble; Val Davison; Paul Davies; Pramila Ramani; David Ellison; Richard Grundy
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Intracranial ependymomas in children: a critical review of prognostic factors and a plea for cooperation.

Authors:  E Bouffet; G Perilongo; A Canete; M Massimino
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1998-06

3.  Histopathological grading of pediatric ependymoma: reproducibility and clinical relevance in European trial cohorts.

Authors:  David W Ellison; Mehmet Kocak; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Giangaspero Felice; Godfraind Catherine; Torsten Pietsch; Didier Frappaz; Maura Massimino; Jacques Grill; James M Boyett; Richard G Grundy
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 4.  Ependymoma: new therapeutic approaches including radiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas E Merchant; Maryam Fouladi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Prognostic factors in intracranial ependymomas in children.

Authors:  D Figarella-Branger; M Civatte; C Bouvier-Labit; J Gouvernet; D Gambarelli; J C Gentet; G Lena; M Choux; J F Pellissier
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Clinicopathologic study of 61 patients with ependymoma including MIB-1 immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  R A Prayson
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.090

7.  Pediatric intracranial ependymomas: prognostic relevance of histological, immunohistochemical, and flow cytometric factors.

Authors:  Josef Zamecnik; Matija Snuderl; Tomas Eckschlager; Marketa Chanova; Marie Hladikova; Michal Tichy; Roman Kodet
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Intracranial ependymomas of childhood. Lack of correlation of histopathology and clinical outcome.

Authors:  P C Gerszten; I F Pollack; A J Martínez; K H Lo; J Janosky; A L Albright
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.250

9.  Ki-67 immunolabelling index is a prognostic indicator in childhood posterior fossa ependymomas.

Authors:  L Bennetto; N Foreman; B Harding; R Hayward; J Ironside; S Love; D Ellison
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.090

10.  Genetic abnormalities detected in ependymomas by comparative genomic hybridisation.

Authors:  M Carter; J Nicholson; F Ross; J Crolla; R Allibone; V Balaji; R Perry; D Walker; R Gilbertson; D W Ellison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  46 in total

1.  Benefit from prolonged dose-intensive chemotherapy for infants with malignant brain tumors is restricted to patients with ependymoma: a report of the Pediatric Oncology Group randomized controlled trial 9233/34.

Authors:  Douglas R Strother; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; James M Boyett; Peter Burger; Patricia Aronin; Louis Constine; Patricia Duffner; Mehmet Kocak; Larry E Kun; Marc E Horowitz; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 demonstrates global reduction in group-A childhood posterior fossa ependymoma and is a powerful predictor of outcome.

Authors:  Pooja Panwalkar; Jonathan Clark; Vijay Ramaswamy; Debra Hawes; Fusheng Yang; Christopher Dunham; Stephen Yip; Juliette Hukin; Yilun Sun; Matthew J Schipper; Lukas Chavez; Ashley Margol; Melike Pekmezci; Chan Chung; Adam Banda; Jill M Bayliss; Sarah J Curry; Mariarita Santi; Fausto J Rodriguez; Matija Snuderl; Matthias A Karajannis; Amanda M Saratsis; Craig M Horbinski; Anne-Sophie Carret; Beverly Wilson; Donna Johnston; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; Shayna Zelcer; David Eisenstat; Marianna Silva; Katrin Scheinemann; Nada Jabado; P Daniel McNeely; Marcel Kool; Stefan M Pfister; Michael D Taylor; Cynthia Hawkins; Andrey Korshunov; Alexander R Judkins; Sriram Venneti
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 17.088

Review 3.  Ependymomas: development of immunotherapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Ian F Pollack; Regina I Jakacki; Lisa H Butterfield; Hideho Okada
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.618

4.  Molecular grouping and outcomes of young children with newly diagnosed ependymoma treated on the multi-institutional SJYC07 trial.

Authors:  Santhosh A Upadhyaya; Giles W Robinson; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Brent A Orr; Catherine A Billups; Daniel C Bowers; Anne E Bendel; Tim Hassall; John R Crawford; Sonia Partap; Paul G Fisher; Ruth G Tatevossian; Tiffany Seah; Ibrahim A Qaddoumi; Anna Vinitsky; Gregory T Armstrong; Noah D Sabin; Christopher L Tinkle; Paul Klimo; Danny J Indelicato; Frederick A Boop; Thomas E Merchant; David W Ellison; Amar Gajjar
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Is H3K27me3 status really a strong prognostic indicator for pediatric posterior fossa ependymomas? A single surgeon, single center experience.

Authors:  Bahattin Tanrıkulu; Ayça Erşen Danyeli; M Memet Özek
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Supratentorial "vascular" variant of ependymoma: a lesser known morphologic variant and a diagnostic pitfall.

Authors:  Kirti Gupta; Muralidaran Chandrasekaran; Ravi Garg; Pravin Salunke
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Amar Gajjar; Roger J Packer; N K Foreman; Kenneth Cohen; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Molecular heterogeneity and CXorf67 alterations in posterior fossa group A (PFA) ependymomas.

Authors:  Kristian W Pajtler; Ji Wen; Martin Sill; Tong Lin; Wilda Orisme; Bo Tang; Jens-Martin Hübner; Vijay Ramaswamy; Sujuan Jia; James D Dalton; Kelly Haupfear; Hazel A Rogers; Chandanamali Punchihewa; Ryan Lee; John Easton; Gang Wu; Timothy A Ritzmann; Rebecca Chapman; Lukas Chavez; Fredrick A Boop; Paul Klimo; Noah D Sabin; Robert Ogg; Stephen C Mack; Brian D Freibaum; Hong Joo Kim; Hendrik Witt; David T W Jones; Baohan Vo; Amar Gajjar; Stan Pounds; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Martine F Roussel; Jinghui Zhang; J Paul Taylor; Thomas E Merchant; Richard Grundy; Ruth G Tatevossian; Michael D Taylor; Stefan M Pfister; Andrey Korshunov; Marcel Kool; David W Ellison
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 17.088

9.  Craniospinal irradiation as part of re-irradiation for children with recurrent intracranial ependymoma.

Authors:  Derek S Tsang; Louise Murray; Vijay Ramaswamy; Michal Zapotocky; Uri Tabori; Ute Bartels; Annie Huang; Peter B Dirks; Michael D Taylor; Cynthia Hawkins; Eric Bouffet; Normand Laperriere
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Supratentorial ependymoma: disease control, complications, and functional outcomes after irradiation.

Authors:  Efrat Landau; Frederick A Boop; Heather M Conklin; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.