| Literature DB >> 22525439 |
Na Guo1, Zhiwei Hu, Xiaoxu Fan, Jian Zheng, Dehui Zhang, Tao Xu, Tao Yu, Yang Wang, Haiying Li.
Abstract
Salidroside and its aglycone p-tyrosol are two major phenols in the genus Rhodiola and have been confirmed to possess various pharmacological properties. In our present study, p-tyrosol was identified as the deglycosylation metabolite of salidroside after intravenous (i.v.) administration to rats at a dose of 50 mg/kg, but was not detectable after intragastric gavage (i.g.) administration through HPLC-photodiode array detection (PDA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. Next, an accurate and precise LC-MS/MS method was developed to quantitatively determine salidroside and p-tyrosol in rat plasma samples. Samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS on a reverse-phase xTerra MS C18 column which was equilibrated and eluted with an isocratic mixture of acetonitrile-water (1:9, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The analytes were monitored by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) under the negative electrospray ionization mode. The precursor/product transitions (m/z) were 299.0 → 118.8 for salidroside, 137.0 → 118.9 for p-tyrosol and 150.1 → 106.9 for the internal standard (IS), paracetamol, respectively. The calibration curve was linear over the concentration ranges of 50-2,000 ng/mL for salidroside and 20-200 ng/mL for p-tyrosol. The inter- and intra-day accuracy and precision were within ± 15%. The method has been successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study and the oral bioavailability was calculated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22525439 PMCID: PMC6268902 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17044733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of (a) salidroside; (b) p-tyrosol; and (c) paracetamol (IS).
Figure 2Representative chromatograms of: (a) a blank rat plasma sample; (b) a blank rat plasma spiked with salidroside and p-tyrosol (20 μg/mL); (c) a rat plasma sample collected 5 min after i.v. administration of salidroside (50 mg/kg); (d) a rat plasma sample collected 30 min after i.g. administration of salidroside (100 mg/kg). (1: salidroside, 2: p-tyrosol).
Figure 3Product ion mass spectra of [M−H]−. (a) Salidroside ([M−H]−, m/z 299.0); (b) p-Tyrosol ([M−H]−, m/z 137.0); (c) IS (paracetamol) ([M−H]−, m/z 150.1).
ESI-MS/MS parameters for salidroside, p-tyrosol and paracetamol (IS).
| Analyte | Precursor ion (
| Daughter ion (
| Dwell time (s) | Cone voltage (V) | Collision energy (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salidroside | 299.0 | 118.8 a, 179.0 | 0.2 | 28 | 14 |
| 137.0 | 105.8,118.9 a | 0.2 | 35 | 16 | |
| Paracetamol (IS) | 150.1 | 106.9 a | 0.2 | 35 | 20 |
a Ion for quantification.
Figure 4MRM chromatograms of salidroside, p-tyrosol and IS in (a) a blank rat plasma sample; (b) a blank rat plasma spiked with salidroside (500 ng·mL−1), p-tyrosol (100 ng·mL−1) and IS (200 ng·mL−1); (c) a rat plasma sample collected 5 min after i.v. administration of salidroside (50 mg/kg) with IS (200 ng·mL−1); (d) a rat plasma sample collected 5 min after i.g. administration of salidroside (100 mg/kg) with IS (200 ng·mL−1); (e) a rat plasma sample collected 30 min after i.g. administration of salidroside (100 mg/kg) with IS (200 ng·mL−1); (f) a rat plasma sample collected 2 h after i.g. administration of salidroside (100 mg/kg) with IS (200 ng·mL−1); (g) a rat plasma sample collected 4 h after i.g. administration of salidroside (100 mg/kg) with IS (200 ng·mL−1).
Accuracy and precision for the determination of salidroside and p-tyrosol in plasma samples (n = 6).
| Analyte | Concentration (ng/mL) | Intra-day | Inter-day | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (ng/mL) | Precision (%) | Accuracy (%) | Mean ± SD (ng/mL) | Precision (%) | Accuracy (%) | ||
| salidroside | 50 | 49.84 ± 4.14 | 8.30 | 99.67 | 52.08 ± 1.82 | 3.49 | 104.17 |
| 500 | 500.68 ± 35.75 | 7.14 | 100.14 | 498.83 ± 49.83 | 9.99 | 99.77 | |
| 2,000 | 1,996.92 ± 62.58 | 3.13 | 99.85 | 2,011.80 ± 63.96 | 3.18 | 100.59 | |
| 20 | 23.16 ± 2.36 | 10.20 | 114.82 | 22.86 ± 2.62 | 11.44 | 114.29 | |
| 100 | 107.08 ± 9.28 | 8.67 | 107.08 | 109.84 ± 2.83 | 2.57 | 109.84 | |
| 200 | 208.03 ± 15.80 | 7.59 | 104.02 | 206.04 ± 14.98 | 7.27 | 103.02 | |
Recovery and matrix effects of salidroside and p-tyrosol in plasma samples (n = 3).
| Analyte | Concentration(ng/mL) | Recovery | Matrix effects | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | RSD (%) | Mean ± SD | RSD (%) | ||
| salidroside | 50 | 83.98 ± 0.22 | 0.26 | 113.04 ± 6.50 | 5.75 |
| 500 | 104.11 ± 13.29 | 12.76 | 83.91 ± 5.91 | 7.05 | |
| 2,000 | 99.30 ± 2.33 | 3.82 | 89.33 ± 1.76 | 1.97 | |
| 20 | 103.71 ± 3.17 | 3.05 | 96.07 ± 0.91 | 0.95 | |
| 100 | 94.67 ± 11.94 | 12.61 | 80.39 ± 10.54 | 13.11 | |
| 200 | 98.79 ± 8.70 | 8.81 | 90.84 ± 11.39 | 12.53 | |
Stability of salidroside (n = 6).
| Experimental condition | Added, C (ng·mL−1) | Found, C ± S.D. (ng·mL−1) | RSD (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard solution2 h at RT | 50 | 52.04 ± 1.89 | 3.63 | 104.08 |
| 500 | 517.76 ± 32.17 | 6.21 | 103.55 | |
| 2,000 | 2,041.93 ± 12.53 | 0.61 | 102.10 | |
| Standard solution30 days at 4 °C | 50 | 49.81 ± 4.78 | 0.59 | 99.62 |
| 500 | 498.05 ± 40.72 | 8.18 | 99.61 | |
| 2,000 | 1,989.01 ± 69.32 | 3.48 | 99.45 | |
| QC samplesAutosampler24 h at RT | 50 | 48.83 ± 5.37 | 11.00 | 97.67 |
| 500 | 519.87 ± 29.48 | 5.67 | 103.97 | |
| 2,000 | 1,997.68 ± 67.16 | 3.36 | 99.88 | |
| QC samples30 days storageat −20 °C | 50 | 51.55±1.83 | 3.56 | 103.09 |
| 500 | 501.92 ± 41.15 | 8.20 | 100.38 | |
| 2,000 | 2,015.99 ± 52.89 | 2.62 | 100.80 | |
| QC samples3 freeze-thaw cycles | 50 | 49.78 ± 4.78 | 9.60 | 99.56 |
| 500 | 512.25 ± 28.49 | 5.56 | 102.45 | |
| 2,000 | 2,011.61 ± 61.51 | 3.06 | 100.58 |
Stability of p-tyrosol (n = 6).
| Experimental condition | Added, C (ng·mL−1) | Found, C ± S.D. (ng·mL−1) | RSD (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard solution2 h at RT | 20 | 21.53 ± 1.09 | 5.06 | 107.66 |
| 100 | 110.95 ± 4.06 | 3.66 | 110.95 | |
| 200 | 218.65 ± 8.27 | 3.78 | 109.32 | |
| Standard solution30 days at 4 °C | 20 | 23.55 ± 2.54 | 10.79 | 117.74 |
| 100 | 105. 20 ± 9.55 | 9.08 | 105.20 | |
| 200 | 203.25 ± 13.44 | 6.61 | 101.63 | |
| QC samplesAutosampler24 h at RT | 20 | 22.55 ± 2.73 | 12.09 | 112.73 |
| 100 | 105.86 ± 12.69 | 11.99 | 105.86 | |
| 200 | 213.41 ± 16.64 | 7.80 | 106.71 | |
| QC samples30 days storageat −20 °C | 20 | 22.55±2.22 | 9.86 | 112.76 |
| 100 | 111.03 ± 3.32 | 2.99 | 111.03 | |
| 200 | 211.31 ± 16.15 | 7.64 | 105.66 | |
| QC samples3 freeze-thaw cycles | 20 | 22.55 ± 2.23 | 9.87 | 112.76 |
| 100 | 106.04 ± 10.37 | 9.78 | 106.36 | |
| 200 | 212.71± 13.66 | 6.42 | 106.36 |
Figure 5Mean concentration-time profiles in rat plasma (n = 6) obtained after i.v. administration of salidroside (i.v. 50 mg/kg) and i.g. administration of salidroside (i.g. 100 mg/kg). (a: salidroside; b: p-tyrosol).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of salidroside and p-tyrosol in rats (n = 6).
| Parameters | I.v. administration (50 mg/kg) | I.g. administration (100 mg/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salidroside (mean ± SD) | Salidroside (mean ± SD) | ||
| Cmax (ng/mL) | - | - | 3,716.73 ± 860.13 |
| Tmax (h) | - | - | 0.30 ± 0.10 |
| T1/2 (h) | 0.70 ± 0.21 | 1.64 ± 0.30 | 1.32 ± 0.22 |
| AUC0–4h (h·ng/mL) | 7,060.72 ± 1337.51 | 122.77 ± 25.90 | 7,552.92 ± 549.02 |
| AUC0–∞ (h·ng/mL) | 7,135.79 ± 1346.40 | 146.83 ± 32.49 | 7,724.52 ± 446.62 |
| MRT (h) | 0.41 ± 0.13 | 1.84 ± 0.32 | 2.07 ± 0.51 |
| Cl (L/h) | 1.78 ± 0.36 | 54.97 ± 18.56 | 2.54 ± 0.15 |
| Vss (L) | 0.98 ± 0.33 | 0.160 ± 0.05 | 4.46 ± 1.19 |
| F (%) | 51.97 ± 2.67 | ||