Literature DB >> 22525310

Autologous incubated macrophage therapy in acute, complete spinal cord injury: results of the phase 2 randomized controlled multicenter trial.

D P Lammertse1, L A T Jones, S B Charlifue, S C Kirshblum, D F Apple, K T Ragnarsson, S P Falci, R F Heary, T F Choudhri, A L Jenkins, R R Betz, D Poonian, J P Cuthbert, A Jha, D A Snyder, N Knoller.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with single-blinded primary outcome assessment.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of autologous incubated macrophage treatment for improving neurological outcome in patients with acute, complete spinal cord injury (SCI).
SETTING: Six SCI treatment centers in the United States and Israel.
METHODS: Participants with traumatic complete SCI between C5 motor and T11 neurological levels who could receive macrophage therapy within 14 days of injury were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to the treatment (autologous incubated macrophages) or control (standard of care) groups. Treatment group participants underwent macrophage injection into the caudal boundary of the SCI. The primary outcome measure was American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) A-B or better at ≥6 months. Safety was assessed by analysis of adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Of 43 participants (26 treatment, 17 control) having sufficient data for efficacy analysis, AIS A to B or better conversion was experienced by 7 treatment and 10 control participants; AIS A to C conversion was experienced by 2 treatment and 2 control participants. The primary outcome analysis for subjects with at least 6 months follow-up showed a trend favoring the control group that did not achieve statistical significance (P=0.053). The mean number of AEs reported per participant was not significantly different between the groups (P=0.942).
CONCLUSION: The analysis failed to show a significant difference in primary outcome between the two groups. The study results do not support treatment of acute complete SCI with autologous incubated macrophage therapy as specified in this protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22525310     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  46 in total

Review 1.  Common data elements for spinal cord injury clinical research: a National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke project.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen; S Alai; K Anderson; S Charlifue; Y Chen; M DeVivo; A E Flanders; L Jones; N Kleitman; A Lans; V K Noonan; J Odenkirchen; J Steeves; K Tansey; E Widerström-Noga; L B Jakeman
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Macrophage migration inhibitory factor as a therapeutic target after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Piri; Zahra Ghodsi; Sina Shool; Ali Anjomshoa; Amir Azarhomayoun; Ehsan Jangholi; Hamid Reza Dehghan; Rasha Atlasi; Alexander R Vaccaro; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Central nervous system regenerative failure: role of oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and microglia.

Authors:  Jerry Silver; Martin E Schwab; Phillip G Popovich
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Experimental Treatments for Spinal Cord Injury: What you Should Know.

Authors:  Vieri Failli; Naomi Kleitman; Daniel P Lammertse; Jane T C Hsieh; John D Steeves; James W Fawcett; Mark H Tuszynski; Armin Curt; Michael G Fehlings; James D Guest; Andrew R Blight
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2021

5.  Assessing the ability of the Sacral Autonomic Standards to document bladder and bowel function based upon the Asia Impairment Scale.

Authors:  Marca Alexander; Conley Carr; Jagger Alexander; Yuying Chen; Amie McLain
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-10-18

Review 6.  Emerging therapies for acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jefferson R Wilson; Nicole Forgione; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Improving the therapeutic efficacy of neural progenitor cell transplantation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Michael A Lane; Angelo C Lepore; Itzhak Fischer
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 8.  Adaptive trial designs for spinal cord injury clinical trials directed to the central nervous system.

Authors:  James D Guest; John D Steeves; M J Mulcahey; Linda A T Jones; Frank Rockhold; Rϋediger Rupp; John L K Kramer; Steven Kirshblum; Andrew Blight; Daniel Lammertse
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  The anorectal exam is unnecessary!

Authors:  Ralph J Marino
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  Minimizing errors in acute traumatic spinal cord injury trials by acknowledging the heterogeneity of spinal cord anatomy and injury severity: an observational Canadian cohort analysis.

Authors:  Marcel F Dvorak; Vanessa K Noonan; Nader Fallah; Charles G Fisher; Carly S Rivers; Henry Ahn; Eve C Tsai; A G Linassi; Sean D Christie; Najmedden Attabib; R John Hurlbert; Daryl R Fourney; Michael G Johnson; Michael G Fehlings; Brian Drew; Christopher S Bailey; Jérôme Paquet; Stefan Parent; Andrea Townson; Chester Ho; B C Craven; Dany Gagnon; Deborah Tsui; Richard Fox; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Brian K Kwon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.