Literature DB >> 22525253

Objective evaluation of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction using three-dimensional imaging.

Helga Henseler1, Joanna Smith, Adrian Bowman, Balvinder S Khambay, Xiangyang Ju, Ashraf Ayoub, Arup K Ray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The latissimus dorsi muscle flap is a common method for the reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy. The study aimed to assess the quality of this reconstruction using a three-dimensional (3D) imaging method. The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in volume between the reconstructed breast and the opposite side.
METHODS: This study was conducted in forty-four patients who had had immediate unilateral breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi muscle flap. The breast was captured using the 3D imaging system. Ten landmarks were digitised on the 3D images. The volume of each breast was measured by the application of Breast Analysis Tool software. The symmetry of the breast was measured using Procrustes analysis. The impact of breast position, orientation, size and intrinsic shape on the overall breast asymmetry was investigated.
RESULTS: The null hypothesis was rejected. The reconstructed breast showed a significantly smaller volume when compared to the opposite side, p < 0.0001, a mean difference of 176.8 cc and 95% CI (103.5, 250.0). The shape and the position of the reconstructed breast were the main contributing factors to the measured asymmetry score.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D imaging was efficient in evaluating the outcome of breast surgery. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap on its own for breast reconstruction did not restore the volume and shape of the breast fully lost due to complete mastectomy. The modification of this method and the selection of other or additional surgical techniques for breast reconstruction should be considered. The asymmetry analysis through reflection and Procrustes matching was a useful method for the objective shape analysis of the female breast and presented a new approach for breast shape assessment. The intrinsic breast shape and the positioning of the breast were major components of postoperative breast asymmetry. The reconstructed breast was smaller overall than the un-operated breast at a significant level when assessing the breast volume using the surface area. 3D imaging by multiple stereophotogrammetry was a useful tool for volume measurements, shape analysis and the evaluation of symmetry.
Copyright © 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22525253     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.03.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  [Application of 3D visualization technique in breast cancer surgery with immediate breast reconstruction using laparoscopically harvested pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle flap].

Authors:  Pu-Sheng Zhang; Li-Kun Wang; Yun-Feng Luo; Fu-Jun Shi; Lin-Yun He; Cheng-Bing Zeng; Yu Zhang; Chi-Hua Fang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-08-20

2.  Anatomical curve identification.

Authors:  Adrian W Bowman; Stanislav Katina; Joanna Smith; Denise Brown
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Validation of the Vectra XT three-dimensional imaging system for measuring breast volume and symmetry following oncological reconstruction.

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Komel Khabra; Jeffrey C Bamber; Nandita deSouza; Farid Meybodi; Peter A Barry; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  An original method of analysis of the breast contour curve with 3-dimensional imaging: Case series.

Authors:  Yuki Otsuki; Koichi Ueda; Tatsuya Ichida; Takashi Nuri; Masashi Okada
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Development of a Three-Dimensional Hand Model Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry: Assessment of Image Reproducibility.

Authors:  Inge A Hoevenaren; J Meulstee; E Krikken; S J Bergé; D J O Ulrich; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.