Literature DB >> 22525175

Success rates of primary probing for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction in children.

Sourabh Arora1, Keyvan Koushan, John T Harvey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the success rate of nasolacrimal duct probing for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction and to identify the age at which the success rate decreases.
METHODS: Records for probing procedures from 2005 to 2010, over a 56-month period, were reviewed. Successful probing was defined as complete resolution of epiphora 3 months after treatment. Success rates were compared between children <3 years of age and children ≥3 years of age at the time of the procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 168 eyes (128 children, mean age 32.2 ± 23.8 months) had undergone a probing procedure, and the overall success rate was 72%. Children aged <36 months had a success rate of 78%; children aged ≥36 months had a success rate of 50%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age at the time of procedure was a significant risk factor for failed probing (P = 0.035; OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.04-2.69), whereas sex and bilateral surgery were not.
CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of primary probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction was significantly reduced when performed on children ≥3 years of age.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22525175     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.12.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  7 in total

1.  Age-Specific Outcomes of Conservative Approach and Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.

Authors:  Apatsa Lekskul; Puncharut Preechaharn; Passara Jongkhajornpong; Wadakarn Wuthisiri
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-07

2.  Outcome of monocanalicular intubation for complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: the role of age.

Authors:  Bahram Eshraghi; Hadi Ghadimi; Safoora Karami; Mojgan Nikdel
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

3.  Factors affecting treatment outcome in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: A retrospective analysis from South India.

Authors:  Sahil Bhandari; Sabyasachi Sengupta; Dayakar Yadalla; Jayagayathri Rajagopalan; Girish Bharat Velis; Deepti Talele; Sameer Kushwaha
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Success rates of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction at various ages.

Authors:  Marta Świerczyńska; Ewelina Tobiczyk; Piotr Rodak; Dorota Barchanowska; Erita Filipek
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Outcomes of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Surgery Converted into Balloon Dilation and Silicone Intubation due to Probing Difficulty.

Authors:  Oren Yaakov Sagiv; Achia Nemet; Asaf Achiron; Doron Neumann; Raimo Tuuminen; Oriel Spierer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 6.  Insights in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Elena Avram
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction (CNLDO): A Review.

Authors:  Aldo Vagge; Lorenzo Ferro Desideri; Paolo Nucci; Massimiliano Serafino; Giuseppe Giannaccare; Andrea Lembo; Carlo Enrico Traverso
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2018-10-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.