Literature DB >> 22524633

Early removal of urinary catheter leads to greater post-void residuals in patients with thoracic epidural.

C Zaouter1, P Wuethrich, M Miccoli, F Carli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent study showed that the removal of a bladder catheter is safe in presence of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). However, the ability to void satisfactorily can be affected. The aim of this investigation is to determine whether patients with TEA are able to recover the micturition process.
METHODS: On the morning after the surgery patients were randomised into two groups: the early removal group (ERG) (n = 101), with the bladder catheter removed at the same time, and the standard group (SG) (n = 104), where the bladder catheter was kept as long as TEA was functioning (on average 3-5 days after surgery). Following the first micturition, patients underwent regular ultrasound scanning of the bladder until a post-void residual (PVR) less than 200 ml was reached.
RESULTS: All of the patients in the ERG and in the SG started to void and recovered satisfactorily their ability to void, reaching a PVR < 200 ml without requiring a transurethral catheterisation. However, the length of time to reach a PVR < 200 ml in the ERG was significantly longer compared with the SG (345 min ± 169 vs. 207 min ± 122, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In the presence of TEA, the removal of the bladder catheter on the morning after surgery leads to a transient impairment of the lower urinary tract function with no need for re-catheterisation.
© 2012 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica © 2012 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22524633     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02701.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  5 in total

1.  Impact of enhanced recovery program on patients with esophageal cancer in comparison with traditional care.

Authors:  Lihong Wang; Chenjing Zhu; Xuelei Ma; Kai Shen; Hongmei Li; Yuanyuan Hu; Linghong Guo; Jing Zhang; Ping Li
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Early removal of urinary drainage in patients receiving epidural analgesia after colorectal surgery within an ERAS protocol is feasible.

Authors:  André Schreiber; Emine Aydil; Uwe Walschus; Anne Glitsch; Maciej Patrzyk; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Tobias Schulze
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Early removal of urinary catheter after surgery requiring thoracic epidural: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Sarah J Craig; John C Rowlingson; Steve P Morton; Christopher J Thomas; Matthew B Persinger; James Isbell; Christine L Lau; Benjamin D Kozower
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice.

Authors:  A Feldheiser; O Aziz; G Baldini; B P B W Cox; K C H Fearon; L S Feldman; T J Gan; R H Kennedy; O Ljungqvist; D N Lobo; T Miller; F F Radtke; T Ruiz Garces; T Schricker; M J Scott; J K Thacker; L M Ytrebø; F Carli
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.105

5.  Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults.

Authors:  Awaiss Ellahi; Fiona Stewart; Emily A Kidd; Rhonda Griffiths; Ritin Fernandez; Muhammad Imran Omar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.