Literature DB >> 22524453

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: initial Washington University experience.

Youssef S Tanagho1, Sam B Bhayani, Eric H Kim, Gurdarshan S Sandhu, Nicholas P Vaughn, R Sherburne Figenshau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Because of the impact warm ischemia time may have on renal function, various surgical techniques have been proposed to minimize or eliminate warm ischemia. The purpose of this study is to evaluate our initial renal functional outcomes of off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), while assessing the safety profile of this unconventional surgical approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our off-clamp RAPN experience between August 2007 and January 2012. All patients with baseline and postoperative serum creatinine determinations were included. Patient demographics, operative information, perioperative outcomes, and renal functional outcomes were evaluated for this cohort.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients with a mean age of 59.9 years (standard deviation [SD]=12) had a median follow-up of 100 days (range 1-1007 days). In all cases, warm ischemia time was 0 minutes. Mean operative time was 143 minutes (SD=59), and median estimated blood loss was 138 mL (range 50-1500 mL). No intraoperative complications were encountered, and all surgical margins were negative. Our postoperative complication rate was 14.3%. At the most recent follow-up, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 76.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (SD=27.6), compared with 78.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (SD=28.9) preoperatively (P=0.11). Therefore, the mean eGFR decline of 2.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (SD=9.1) was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Off-clamp RAPN is associated with minimal morbidity and minimal decline in renal function on short-term follow-up. Further studies and continued monitoring of renal function are needed to determine if off-clamp RAPN provides any advantage in renal function preservation relative to the traditional RAPN with vascular clamping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22524453     DOI: 10.1089/end.2012.0094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

1.  Small renal masses: is LESS partial nephrectomy feasible for most urologists?

Authors:  Yu-Kuan Lin; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Retrograde renal hilar dissection and segmental arterial clamping: a simple modification to achieve super-selective robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Richard N Greene; Douglas E Sutherland; Timothy J Tausch; Deo S Perez
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-05-14

3.  Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy does not benefit short-term renal function: a matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  Barrett G Anderson; Aaron M Potretzke; Kefu Du; Joel Vetter; R Sherburne Figenshau
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

4.  Clinical values of selective-clamp technique in robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Tae Young Shin; Sey Kiat Lim; Christos Komninos; Dong Wook Kim; Woong Kyu Han; Sung Jun Hong; Byung Ha Jung; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Youssef S Tanagho; Sam B Bhayani; Robert S Figenshau
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.