Literature DB >> 22524402

Does pelvic lymph node dissection improve the biochemical relapse-free survival in low-risk prostate cancer patients treated by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?

Tatsuaki Daimon1, Akira Miyajima, Takahiro Maeda, Seiya Hattori, Yota Yasumizu, Masanori Hasegawa, Takeo Kosaka, Eiji Kikuchi, Ken Nakagawa, Mototsugu Oya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The roles and criteria for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are not fully evaluated in patients with low-risk prostate cancer who are treated by laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). In this study, the outcome of PLND was assessed in terms of the biochemical relapse-free survival rates of low-risk prostate cancer patients who had undergone LRP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Included were 286 consecutive patients who were treated with LRP without previous endocrine therapy between 2002 and 2006 at our institution. Failure rates for LRP were compared in 139 patients with low-risk prostate cancer between those who underwent PLND (n=85) and those who did not (n=54). Biochemical relapse-free survival for each group was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 5.4 ± 0.4 (range 2-22). The 5- and 7-year biochemical relapse-free survival rates were 90.1% and 88.3% in patients with PLND, and 82.4% and 82.4% in those without PLND (P=0.278), respectively (median follow-up 69.4 mos). None of the 85 patients undergoing PLND had positive lymph nodes. Only one patient had symptomatic lymphocele, and he was treated as an inpatient. The average time needed for PLND was 16 minutes, which corresponded to 7% of the entire operative time.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the dissection of pelvic lymph nodes is not related to biochemical relapse-free survival. The omission of PLND in patients with low-risk prostate cancer not only does not adversely affect biochemical relapse-free survival, but might decrease the incidence of complication and operative time of LRP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22524402     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on the efficacy of extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Liang Gao; Lu Yang; Xiao Lv; Siyuan Bu; Fan Wan; Shengqiang Qian; Qiang Wei; Ping Han; Tianyong Fan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  The survival benefit of lymph node dissection at the time of removal of kidney, prostate and urothelial carcinomas: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Karim Bensalah; Morgan Roupret; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer the only recommended option? A systematic over-view of the literature.

Authors:  Thomas Rees; Nicholas Raison; Mohammed Iqbal Sheikh; Zahra Jaffry; Sanjeev Madaan; Ben Challacombe; Kamran Ahmed; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-12

Review 4.  THE ROLE OF LYMPHADENECTOMY IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS.

Authors:  Dean Markić; Romano Oguić; Kristian Krpina; Ivan Vukelić; Gordana Đorđević; Iva Žuža; Josip Španjol
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.780

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.