Brent A Metfessel 1 , Robert A Greene . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a compositing method that demonstrates improved performance compared with commonly used tests for statistical analysis of physician cost of care data. DATA SOURCE: Commercial preferred provider organization (PPO) claims data for internists from a large metropolitan area. STUDY DESIGN: We created a nonparametric composite performance metric that maintains risk adjustment using the Wilcoxon rank-sum (WRS) test. We compared the resulting algorithm to the parametric observed-to-expected ratio, with and without a statistical test, for stability of physician cost ratings among different outlier trimming methods and across two partially overlapping time periods. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The WRS algorithm showed significantly greater within-physician stability among several typical outlier trimming and capping methods. The algorithm also showed significantly greater within-physician stability when the same physicians were analyzed across time periods. CONCLUSIONS: The nonparametric algorithm described is a more robust and more stable methodology for evaluating physician cost of care than commonly used observed-to-expected ratio techniques. Use of such an algorithm can improve physician cost assessment for important current applications such as public reporting, pay for performance, and tiered benefit design. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a compositing method that demonstrates improved performance compared with commonly used tests for statistical analysis of physician cost of care data. DATA SOURCE: Commercial preferred provider organization (PPO) claims data for internists from a large metropolitan area. STUDY DESIGN: We created a nonparametric composite performance metric that maintains risk adjustment using the Wilcoxon rank-sum (WRS) test. We compared the resulting algorithm to the parametric observed-to-expected ratio, with and without a statistical test, for stability of physician cost ratings among different outlier trimming methods and across two partially overlapping time periods. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The WRS algorithm showed significantly greater within-physician stability among several typical outlier trimming and capping methods. The algorithm also showed significantly greater within-physician stability when the same physicians were analyzed across time periods. CONCLUSIONS: The nonparametric algorithm described is a more robust and more stable methodology for evaluating physician cost of care than commonly used observed-to-expected ratio techniques. Use of such an algorithm can improve physician cost assessment for important current applications such as public reporting, pay for performance, and tiered benefit design. © Health Research and Educational Trust.
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2012
PMID: 22524195 PMCID: PMC3523381 DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01415.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Serv Res ISSN: 0017-9124 Impact factor: 3.402