| Literature DB >> 22523566 |
Jun-hui Yuan1, Fang-Yun Cheng, Shi-Liang Zhou.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tree peonies are great ornamental plants associated with a rich ethnobotanical history in Chinese culture and have recently been used as an evolutionary model. The Qinling Mountains represent a significant geographic barrier in Asia, dividing mainland China into northern (temperate) and southern (semi-tropical) regions; however, their flora has not been well analyzed. In this study, the genetic differentiation and genetic structure of Paeonia rockii and the role of the Qinling Mountains as a barrier that has driven intraspecific fragmentation were evaluated using 14 microsatellite markers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22523566 PMCID: PMC3327690 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Geographic and topographic barriers, ancestral gene pools, and locations of populations sampled in Paeonia rockii.
Genetic diversity measures estimated using 14 microsatellite loci in each of 20 Paeonia rockii populations.
| Population | n |
|
|
|
|
| IAM | SMM |
| BHC | 6 | 1.93 | 1.81 | 0.25 | 0.319 | 0.236 | 0.064 | 0.18 |
| BHP | 6 | 3.29 | 2.71 | 0.469 | 0.391 | −0.227 | 0.055 | 0.151 |
| DC | 25 | 5.29 | 2.86 | 0.493 | 0.554 | 0.116 | 0.38 | 0.999 |
| DS | 22 | 4.29 | 2.6 | 0.38 | 0.494 | 0.235 | 0.38 | 0.979 |
| GQ | 29 | 3.71 | 2.64 | 0.543 | 0.519 | −0.046 | 0.002 | 0.768 |
| HS | 26 | 3.21 | 2.13 | 0.347 | 0.395 | 0.122 | 0.428 | 0.979 |
| JFM | 4 | 3.43 | - | 0.673 | 0.691 | 0.03 | - | - |
| JL | 27 | 6.64 | 3.58 | 0.543 | 0.667 | 0.189 | 0.010 | 0.979 |
| KZV | 13 | 4.64 | 3.16 | 0.509 | 0.609 | 0.17 | 0.052 | 0.866 |
| LC | 12 | 2.71 | 2.43 | 0.507 | 0.434 | −0.178 | 0.001 | 0.055 |
| LD | 24 | 4.21 | 2.6 | 0.476 | 0.533 | 0.11 | 0.034 | 0.709 |
| LY | 3 | 2.07 | - | 0.333 | 0.41 | 0.222 | - | - |
| MY | 24 | 5.36 | 3.12 | 0.616 | 0.642 | 0.041 | 0.001 | 0.749 |
| NX | 24 | 4.07 | 2.48 | 0.552 | 0.512 | −0.068 | 0.148 | 0.955 |
| TC | 2 | 1.43 | - | 0.286 | 0.274 | −0.067 | - | - |
| TM | 3 | 1.86 | - | 0.381 | 0.352 | −0.103 | - | - |
| WX | 30 | 5.14 | 2.77 | 0.538 | 0.566 | 0.051 | 0.047 | 0.905 |
| YP | 26 | 4.79 | 2.62 | 0.508 | 0.515 | 0.014 | 0.665 | 1 |
| YS | 3 | 2.29 | - | 0.393 | 0.488 | 0.241 | - | - |
| ZX | 26 | 3.43 | 2.29 | 0.384 | 0.471 | 0.188 | 0.086 | 0.787 |
| Average | 16.75 | 3.69 | 2.65 | 0.459 | 0.492 |
Note: n, sample size; A, number of alleles per locus; AR [10], mean within-population allelic richness for a standardized sample size of ten gene copies; H, observed heterozygosity; H, unbiased expected heterozygosity; F, fixation index. Sequential Bonferroni correction was used to determine significance levels in multiple tests.
Deviations of F from 0 in each population were evaluated by permutation tests.
Probabilities associated with Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests (one-tailed) for H>H, where H is the heterozygosity expected at mutation-drift equilibrium under the infinite-allele model (IAM) and the stepwise-mutation model (SMM) (Cornuet and Luikart 1996; Piry et al. 1999).
P<0.05,
P<0.01,
P<0.001.
Genetic diversity measures estimated at each of 14 microsatellite loci across the 20 Paeonia rockii populations.
| Marker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| pdel02-2 | 5 | 16.250 | 0.301 | 0.245 | 0.288 | −0.288 | 0.153 | 0.16 |
| pdel05 | 11 | 15.700 | 0.425 | 0.533 | 0.705 | 0.203 | 0.245 | 0.312 |
| pdel06 | 8 | 16.500 | 0.798 | 0.566 | 0.79 | −0.412 | 0.218 | 0.032 |
| pdel07 | 12 | 15.600 | 0.688 | 0.648 | 0.756 | −0.044 | 0.095 | - |
| Pdel20 | 18 | 16.100 | 0.533 | 0.53 | 0.743 | −0.077 | 0.3 | 0.495 |
| pdel22 | 9 | 16.200 | 0.343 | 0.479 | 0.731 | 0.221 | 0.308 | 0.224 |
| pdel29b | 9 | 16.700 | 0.582 | 0.5 | 0.74 | −0.165 | 0.334 | 0.467 |
| pdel33 | 17 | 15.800 | 0.414 | 0.609 | 0.805 | 0.428 | 0.263 | - |
| pdel35 | 13 | 16.200 | 0.49 | 0.554 | 0.792 | 0.137 | 0.33 | 0.207 |
| jx02-2 | 22 | 16.300 | 0.505 | 0.627 | 0.899 | 0.203 | 0.337 | 0.399 |
| jx05-2 | 13 | 15.050 | 0.235 | 0.324 | 0.715 | 0.229 | 0.584 | 0.179 |
| jx17 | 18 | 15.700 | 0.417 | 0.612 | 0.91 | 0.293 | 0.262 | 0.379 |
| jx27 | 15 | 14.750 | 0.564 | 0.629 | 0.891 | 0.03 | 0.265 | 0.33 |
| jx29 | 13 | 15.700 | 0.304 | 0.371 | 0.723 | 0.298 | 0.494 | 0.64 |
| Mean | 9.15 | 16.250 | 0.471 | 0.516 | 0.749 | 0.08 | 0.302 | 0.487 |
Note: TA, total number of alleles; H, observed heterozygosity; H, gene diversity; H, overall gene diversity; F, fixation index; F and R, measures of relative genetic differentiation among populations under the infinite-allele model and the stepwise-mutation model, respectively. Sequential Bonferroni correction was used to determine significance levels in the multiple tests.
Deviations of F, F and R from 0 were evaluated by permutation tests.
P<0.001.
Results of the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for 20 populations of Paeonia rockii categorized into three geographical regions.
| Source of variation | d.f. | Sum of squares | Variation components | Variation (%) |
| Among groups | 2 | 358.542 | 0.77859 | 16.04 |
| Among populations within group | 17 | 565.003 | 1.00544 | 20.72 |
| Within populations | 315 | 1891.071 | 3.06892 | 63.24 |
d.f., degrees of freedom.
P<0.001, P-values were obtained after 11024 permutations.
Figure 2Bayesian inference of the number of clusters (K) of Paeonia rockii.
K was estimated using (A) the posterior probability of the data given each K (10 replicates) and (B) the distribution of ▵K, and (C) the three colored clusters were detected from STRUCTURE analysis. The name of each site is given below.
Figure 3The first five genetic boundaries (thick lines) detected by BARRIER version 2.2 using genetic distance.
The order of the alphabetical pairs represents the sequence of the boundary formation. Large numbers correspond to the population numbers plotted along the ordination. Small numbers represent the bootstrap values indicating support for the respective boundaries. Thin dashed lines and solid lines represent the Voronoi tessellation and the Delaunay triangulation, respectively.