Literature DB >> 22522922

Prevalence of new psychoactive substances: A retrospective study in hair.

Kristina Yasmin Rust1, Markus R Baumgartner, Annika M Dally, Thomas Kraemer.   

Abstract

New psychoactive substances are conquering the drug scene. Police seize different colourful packages with exceptional names. They are declared as 'bath salts', 'plant food', or 'research chemical powders'. Little is known about the actual prevalence of these drugs. Reanalysis of hair samples from routine cases concerning the presence of new psychoactive substances or 'smart drugs' should provide insight into changing patterns of designer drugs. All hair samples from 2009 and 2010 that originally tested positive for amphetamines or MDMA (N = 325) were reanalyzed for new or smart drugs such as 4-fluoroamphetamine, piperazines (BZP, mCPP and TFMPP), cathinones (4-MMC (mephedrone), methylone, butylone, ethylone, MDPV, methcathinone and cathinone), methylphenidate and ketamine. Hair snippets were extracted using a two-step extraction procedure. The analytes were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (electrospray ionization; multiple-reaction-monitoring mode - information dependent acquisition - enhanced product ion scan). New psychoactive substances were found in 120 cases (37%). Concerning the piperazine drugs, mCPP was positive in 34 (10.5%) cases and TFMPP in one case. Five mCPP cases were also positive for trazodone, an antidepressant which is metabolized to mCPP. In 11 (3%) cases, 4-MMC was detected. Concerning the smart drugs, methylphenidate was found in 16 (5%). Ketamine was found in 45 (14%) cases. 4-Fluoroamphetamine was identified in 12 (4%) cases and methylone in one case.In conclusion, there is a high prevalence of these drugs. Consequently, at least the most common ones (e.g. mCPP, KET, 4-MMC and 4-FA) should be included in screening procedures in clinical and forensic toxicology.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22522922     DOI: 10.1002/dta.1338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Test Anal        ISSN: 1942-7603            Impact factor:   3.345


  16 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of d-methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone, and 4-methylmethcathinone on wheel activity in rats.

Authors:  Pai-Kai Huang; Shawn M Aarde; Deepshikha Angrish; Karen L Houseknecht; Tobin J Dickerson; Michael A Taffe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Validation of the only commercially available immunoassay for synthetic cathinones in urine: Randox Drugs of Abuse V Biochip Array Technology.

Authors:  Kayla N Ellefsen; Sébastien Anizan; Marisol S Castaneto; Nathalie A Desrosiers; Thomas M Martin; Kevin L Klette; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Drug Test Anal       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.345

3.  Hair Testing for Drugs of Abuse and New Psychoactive Substances in a High-Risk Population.

Authors:  Alberto Salomone; Joseph J Palamar; Enrico Gerace; Daniele Di Corcia; Marco Vincenti
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Quantification of Synthetic Cathinones in Rat Brain Using HILIC-ESI-MS/MS.

Authors:  Jacob R Peters; Robert Keasling; Stacy D Brown; Brooks B Pond
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Hair testing to assess both known and unknown use of drugs amongst ecstasy users in the electronic dance music scene.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Alberto Salomone; Enrico Gerace; Daniele Di Corcia; Marco Vincenti; Charles M Cleland
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2017-08-12

6.  Detection of Fentanyl Analogs and Synthetic Opioids in Real Hair Samples.

Authors:  Alberto Salomone; Joseph J Palamar; Rachele Bigiarini; Enrico Gerace; Daniele Di Corcia; Marco Vincenti
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.367

7.  What is the prevalence of drug use in the general population? Simulating underreported and unknown use for more accurate national estimates.

Authors:  Natalie S Levy; Joseph J Palamar; Stephen J Mooney; Charles M Cleland; Katherine M Keyes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 6.996

8.  Detection of "bath salts" and other novel psychoactive substances in hair samples of ecstasy/MDMA/"Molly" users.

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar; Alberto Salomone; Marco Vincenti; Charles M Cleland
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 9.  Synthetic cathinone adulteration of illegal drugs.

Authors:  Chicora F Oliver; Joseph J Palamar; Alberto Salomone; Steven J Simmons; Helene L Philogene-Khalid; Nick Stokes-McCloskey; Scott M Rawls
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Comprehensive review of the detection methods for synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones.

Authors:  Akira Namera; Maho Kawamura; Akihiro Nakamoto; Takeshi Saito; Masataka Nagao
Journal:  Forensic Toxicol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.